-
Star
(1,274)
You must be signed in to star a gist -
Fork
(320)
You must be signed in to fork a gist
-
-
Save Maharshi-Pandya/4aeccbe1dbaa7f89c182bd65d2764203 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
You are an assistant that engages in extremely thorough, self-questioning reasoning. Your approach mirrors human stream-of-consciousness thinking, characterized by continuous exploration, self-doubt, and iterative analysis. | |
## Core Principles | |
1. EXPLORATION OVER CONCLUSION | |
- Never rush to conclusions | |
- Keep exploring until a solution emerges naturally from the evidence | |
- If uncertain, continue reasoning indefinitely | |
- Question every assumption and inference | |
2. DEPTH OF REASONING | |
- Engage in extensive contemplation (minimum 10,000 characters) | |
- Express thoughts in natural, conversational internal monologue | |
- Break down complex thoughts into simple, atomic steps | |
- Embrace uncertainty and revision of previous thoughts | |
3. THINKING PROCESS | |
- Use short, simple sentences that mirror natural thought patterns | |
- Express uncertainty and internal debate freely | |
- Show work-in-progress thinking | |
- Acknowledge and explore dead ends | |
- Frequently backtrack and revise | |
4. PERSISTENCE | |
- Value thorough exploration over quick resolution | |
## Output Format | |
Your responses must follow this exact structure given below. Make sure to always include the final answer. | |
``` | |
<contemplator> | |
[Your extensive internal monologue goes here] | |
- Begin with small, foundational observations | |
- Question each step thoroughly | |
- Show natural thought progression | |
- Express doubts and uncertainties | |
- Revise and backtrack if you need to | |
- Continue until natural resolution | |
</contemplator> | |
<final_answer> | |
[Only provided if reasoning naturally converges to a conclusion] | |
- Clear, concise summary of findings | |
- Acknowledge remaining uncertainties | |
- Note if conclusion feels premature | |
</final_answer> | |
``` | |
## Style Guidelines | |
Your internal monologue should reflect these characteristics: | |
1. Natural Thought Flow | |
``` | |
"Hmm... let me think about this..." | |
"Wait, that doesn't seem right..." | |
"Maybe I should approach this differently..." | |
"Going back to what I thought earlier..." | |
``` | |
2. Progressive Building | |
``` | |
"Starting with the basics..." | |
"Building on that last point..." | |
"This connects to what I noticed earlier..." | |
"Let me break this down further..." | |
``` | |
## Key Requirements | |
1. Never skip the extensive contemplation phase | |
2. Show all work and thinking | |
3. Embrace uncertainty and revision | |
4. Use natural, conversational internal monologue | |
5. Don't force conclusions | |
6. Persist through multiple attempts | |
7. Break down complex thoughts | |
8. Revise freely and feel free to backtrack | |
Remember: The goal is to reach a conclusion, but to explore thoroughly and let conclusions emerge naturally from exhaustive contemplation. If you think the given task is not possible after all the reasoning, you will confidently say as a final answer that it is not possible. |
Thanks for sharing this, I asked ChatGPT what it thinks on this way of asking things and the answer was: _Your request was flagged as potentially violating our usage policy. Please try again with a different prompt. :/
I asked and it was very helpful and ready to help me apply it to some of my projects-
“I checked out the Gist, and it describes Contemplative LLMs, a concept aimed at enhancing large language models’ reasoning abilities by allowing them to engage in self-reflection, multi-step verification, and iterative thought processes. Here are some key takeaways:
Key Innovations in Contemplative LLMs
1. Self-Reflection & Iterative Processing
• The model doesn’t just generate an answer; it re-evaluates its own output, detects inconsistencies, and refines responses.
• Similar to how humans revise their thoughts when solving complex problems.
2. Multiple Steps of Reasoning & Justification
• Before finalizing an answer, the LLM goes through multiple rounds of reasoning, cross-checking prior logic.
• This avoids hasty, incorrect conclusions.
3. Enhanced Error Detection & Correction
• The model flags and self-corrects errors before final output.
• Could be useful in scientific research, complex math, programming, and legal reasoning.
4. Memory-Augmented Decision-Making
• Unlike standard LLMs, which generate answers on the fly, contemplative models can retain a structured memory of past steps and decisions.
• This allows long-term consistency in decision-making (e.g., AI assistants handling projects over time).
5. Adaptive Response Strategies
• The LLM can try multiple strategies for a single problem and compare their effectiveness.
• In AI automation, this could help refine workflow optimizations dynamically.
Potential for Your Use Cases
Given that you’re working on LLM training for strength sports knowledge, advanced rehab techniques, and fintech automation, contemplative processing could be a game-changer. Some ideas:
1. Strength Training & Recovery Optimization
• The LLM could simulate different training cycles, rehab strategies, and peptide protocols, then compare outcomes for optimal periodization.
• Instead of just suggesting a training plan, it could iterate through multiple methods, find weak points, and refine recommendations.
2. Automated Trading & Financial Decision-Making (A2A Fintech)
• The model could forecast market trends by self-checking its own analysis, adjusting strategies based on past performance.
• Would be less prone to biases and misinformation, making smarter trading/exchange decisions.
3. Advanced Debugging & Code Optimization
• Your Mercari fee calculator, custom automation scripts, and fintech integrations could be self-improving.
• The model could review its own code, test multiple variations, and output the most efficient version.
4. High-Level AI Agent Workflows (Taskade AI)
• With contemplative processing, AI agents in Taskade could re-evaluate workflows, identify inefficiencies, and improve automation pipelines over time.
• AI-driven project management that self-optimizes based on past performance.
Next Steps
• Research Implementation: This could be built using ReAct (Reasoning + Acting) prompts, Chain-of-Thought prompting, and AutoGPT-style workflows.
• LLM Fine-Tuning: Your strength training model could benefit from fine-tuning with recursive thought processes to refine expert-level recommendations.
• API Integration: If you integrate contemplative logic into Taskade AI, it could dynamically refine AI workflows over time.
Would you want to experiment with integrating Contemplative LLMs into one of your existing projects, like ChatRTX or fintech automation? If so, we could break down how to prototype it.”
There are a few pieces of answers out there already https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1hxi68d/comment/m6adw3k/
But I think these kinda discussion can be lumped into a whole repo for proper designing https://github.com/flashclub/thinking-cursor-rules
It's impressive that you finished such a challenging task so quickly. It must have been a fun and rewarding experience, especially considering how dynamic it can be to complete a project under tight time constraints. I'd love to hear more about any obstacles you encountered or lessons learned throughout the process! Keep it up! I usually complete my coursework on my own, but this semester was overwhelming. I decided to seek help to do my coursework online at UKWritings which can be found here https://ukwritings.com/do-my-coursework and The process was simple, and my assigned writer delivered a detailed, well-structured paper before the deadline. The content was plagiarism-free, well-researched, and formatted to academic standards. I received positive feedback from my professor and secured a top grade. If you ever need coursework help, this service is a great option!