Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@MangaD

MangaD/cpp_profilers.md

Created September 6, 2025 21:46
Show Gist options
  • Save MangaD/81bf5be6d9f8a71c87c28549e033e230 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save MangaD/81bf5be6d9f8a71c87c28549e033e230 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
C++: Profilers
Raw
cpp_profilers.md

C++: Profilers

CC0

Disclaimer: Grok generated document.

Introduction to Profilers for C++

Profilers are essential tools for developers working with C++ to analyze and optimize application performance. They help identify bottlenecks in code execution, such as high CPU usage, memory leaks, cache misses, thread contention, or inefficient algorithms. C++ applications, often used in high-performance domains like games, simulations, embedded systems, and scientific computing, benefit greatly from profiling due to the language's low-level control over resources.

Profilers generally fall into two main categories based on methodology:

  • Sampling Profilers: These periodically interrupt the program to capture the current state (e.g., call stack). They have low overhead but may miss short-lived events.
  • Instrumentation Profilers: These insert code (manually or automatically) to measure events precisely. They provide detailed data but can introduce significant overhead, slowing the program by 10x or more.

Key types of profiling relevant to C++:

  • CPU Profiling: Measures time spent in functions, identifying hotspots.
  • Memory Profiling: Tracks allocations, leaks, and usage patterns.
  • Cache Profiling: Analyzes cache hits/misses for data locality issues.
  • Thread/Lock Profiling: Examines synchronization, contention, and parallelism.
  • GPU Profiling: For C++ code using APIs like CUDA or OpenGL.
  • I/O and System Profiling: Monitors disk, network, or kernel interactions.
  • Causal Profiling: Simulates "what-if" scenarios for optimizations without code changes.

C++ profilers vary by platform (Linux, Windows, macOS, cross-platform), cost (free/open-source vs. commercial), and integration (standalone, IDE-integrated). Many support mixed-mode profiling for C++ with other languages (e.g., Python bindings or .NET interop). Below, I'll cover major profilers in depth, including descriptions, usage examples, pros/cons, and code snippets where applicable. This is based on a synthesis of community discussions, documentation, and tools like those from Stack Overflow, Reddit, and official sites.

Detailed Overview of C++ Profilers

1. gprof (GNU Profiler)

Description: gprof is a classic instrumentation-based CPU profiler included with GCC. It generates flat profiles (time per function) and call graphs (function relationships). It's simple for basic analysis but limited for modern multi-threaded apps.

Type: CPU (instrumentation).

Platforms: Linux, Unix-like (cross-compilable to Windows via MinGW).

How to Use:

  • Compile with -pg: g++ -pg -o program program.cpp.
  • Run: ./program.
  • Analyze: gprof program gmon.out > report.txt.
  • Example: For a Fibonacci program: 
    #include <iostream>
int fib(int n) { return n <= 1 ? n : fib(n-1) + fib(n-2); }
int main() { std::cout << fib(40) << std::endl; return 0; }
    Compile and run as above. gprof output shows fib taking most time, with recursive calls highlighted.

Pros: Free, lightweight, no external dependencies; good for quick function-level insights. Cons: High overhead (2-3x slowdown); inaccurate for multi-threaded or optimized code (-O3 may break it); no memory or thread support; outdated for complex apps.

2. perf (Linux Performance Events)

Description: perf is a powerful, kernel-integrated sampling profiler for Linux. It uses hardware counters for detailed metrics like cycles, branches, and cache misses. It's versatile for system-wide or per-process analysis.

Type: CPU, memory, cache, I/O (sampling).

Platforms: Linux.

How to Use:

  • Record: perf record -g ./program (with call graph).
  • Report: perf report (interactive) or perf script | stackcollapse-perf.pl | flamegraph.pl > graph.svg for flame graphs.
  • Example: Using the same Fibonacci code: Compile: g++ -g -o fib fib.cpp. Run: perf record ./fib. In report, expand stacks to see recursion depth. Flame graph visualizes fib dominance.

Pros: Low overhead (~1-5%); supports multi-threading, kernel profiling; free; integrates with tools like Hotspot for GUI. Cons: Linux-only; requires root for some features; steep learning curve for advanced counters; no built-in GUI (use perf report or external viz).

3. Valgrind Suite

Description: Valgrind is an open-source framework with multiple tools for dynamic analysis. Key for C++: Callgrind (CPU/call graph), Massif (memory/heap), Cachegrind (cache simulation), Helgrind (threads/locks).

Type: CPU, memory, cache, threads (instrumentation/simulated).

Platforms: Linux, macOS, Windows (partial).

How to Use:

  • For Callgrind: valgrind --tool=callgrind ./program.
  • Visualize: kcachegrind callgrind.out.*.
  • Memory with Massif: valgrind --tool=massif ./program; ms_print massif.out.*.
  • Example: Memory leak detection: 
    #include <iostream>
void leak() { int* p = new int[10]; } // No delete
int main() { leak(); return 0; }
    Run: valgrind --leak-check=full ./leak. Output shows 40 bytes lost, with stack trace.

Pros: Deterministic, detailed (line-level); detects leaks, races; free; no recompilation needed. Cons: High overhead (10-100x slowdown); simulated execution may alter timing; not for production.

4. Intel VTune Profiler

Description: VTune is a commercial tool from Intel for in-depth performance analysis, supporting hardware counters for microarchitecture insights (e.g., vectorization, branch mispredictions).

Type: CPU, memory, threads, GPU (sampling/instrumentation).

Platforms: Windows, Linux, macOS.

How to Use:

  • Launch VTune, create project, run Performance Snapshot.
  • For hotspots: Analyze CPU usage.
  • Example: Matrix multiplication sample in VTune tutorial: Run Memory Access analysis to spot poor locality; HPC Characterization for vectorization.

Pros: Deep hardware insights (Intel-specific but works on AMD); GUI-friendly; supports remote/live profiling. Cons: Expensive (~$700/year); biased toward Intel CPUs; resource-heavy.

5. AMD uProf / Omnitrace

Description: AMD's profiler for CPU/GPU, similar to VTune. Omnitrace extends it with tracing and causal profiling.

Type: CPU, memory, GPU (sampling/instrumentation).

Platforms: Linux, Windows.

How to Use:

  • Install Omnitrace: GitHub repo.
  • Run: omnitrace-instrument -- ./program.
  • Analyze with Python scripts for traces.
  • Example: For CPU+GPU workloads, use binary rewrite for instrumentation without recompilation.

Pros: Free (open-source parts); AMD-optimized; supports causal profiling like Coz. Cons: Linux-heavy; less mature GUI; requires AMD hardware for full features.

6. Visual Studio Profiler

Description: Integrated into Visual Studio, it offers CPU, memory, and .NET interop profiling for Windows apps.

Type: CPU, memory, threads (sampling/instrumentation).

Platforms: Windows.

How to Use:

  • In VS: Debug > Performance Profiler > Select tools (e.g., CPU Usage).
  • Example: Load project, profile, view flame graphs or call trees for hotspots.

Pros: Seamless VS integration; free with VS; good for mixed C++/C#. Cons: Windows-only; limited for non-MSVC builds; no GPU support.

7. Tracy

Description: A real-time frame profiler focused on games/low-overhead scenarios. Supports CPU, GPU, memory, locks.

Type: CPU, GPU, memory, threads (instrumentation with optional sampling).

Platforms: Cross-platform (Windows, Linux, macOS).

How to Use:

  • Include Tracy.hpp, add ZoneScoped; to scopes.
  • Build with TRACY_ENABLE.
  • Connect client to running app for live view.
  • Example: 
    #include "Tracy.hpp"
void func() { ZoneScoped; /* code */ }
    Run app, connect Tracy UI to see zones/timelines.

Pros: Low overhead (~15ns/zone); real-time GUI; free/open-source; GPU support (OpenGL/Vulkan). Cons: Requires code instrumentation; higher setup for non-games.

8. Superluminal

Description: A sampling/instrumentation hybrid for high-precision timelines, popular in games. Visualizes thread interactions and spikes.

Type: CPU, threads (sampling with API for instrumentation).

Platforms: Windows, Xbox, PlayStation.

How to Use:

  • Install, run/attach to app.
  • No code changes needed; optional API for events.
  • Example: Launch from UI, capture, view timelines for spikes in functions.

Pros: Intuitive UI; mixed sampling/instrumentation; console support; handles large captures. Cons: Paid (~$100/license); Windows-focused; no memory profiling.

9. Oprofile

Description: A system-wide sampling profiler using hardware counters, similar to perf but older.

Type: CPU, cache (sampling).

Platforms: Linux.

How to Use:

  • opcontrol --start; run program; opcontrol --stop; opreport.
  • Example: Profile system-wide for cache misses.

Pros: Low overhead; system-wide view. Cons: Deprecated in favor of perf; no GUI; root required.

10. Google Performance Tools (gperftools)

Description: Includes tcmalloc (allocator) and CPU/memory profilers. Good for heap leaks and CPU hotspots.

Type: CPU, memory (sampling/instrumentation).

Platforms: Linux, Windows (partial).

How to Use:

  • Link with -lprofiler.
  • Set CPUPROFILE=prof.out env var; run program.
  • Analyze: pprof program prof.out.
  • Example: For leaks, use heap profiler to track allocations.

Pros: Fast; graphical output via kcachegrind; free. Cons: Limited GUI; no thread support; Linux-best.

11. Very Sleepy

Description: A simple, free sampling profiler for Windows, fork of Sleepy.

Type: CPU (sampling).

Platforms: Windows.

How to Use:

  • Attach to running process; capture; view call graphs.
  • Example: Profile a running EXE to see function times.

Pros: Lightweight; no setup; free. Cons: Basic features; no memory/threads; Windows-only.

12. Coz

Description: Causal profiler that simulates optimizations (e.g., "what if this line ran faster?").

Type: Causal/CPU (sampling).

Platforms: Linux.

How to Use:

  • coz run --- ./program.
  • Views speedup predictions.
  • Example: For loops, predicts impact of parallelization.

Pros: Unique "what-if" analysis; low overhead. Cons: Experimental; limited scope; Linux-only.

13. Hotspot (KDAB)

Description: GUI frontend for perf, with flame graphs and timelines.

Type: CPU, etc. (via perf).

Platforms: Linux.

How to Use:

  • Launch Hotspot, record via perf, visualize.
  • Example: Import perf data for interactive graphs.

Pros: User-friendly; free; enhances perf. Cons: Depends on perf; Linux-only.

14. Heaptrack

Description: Memory profiler focused on heap allocations and leaks.

Type: Memory (instrumentation).

Platforms: Linux.

How to Use:

  • heaptrack ./program; heaptrack_gui heaptrack.*.gz.
  • Example: Tracks new/delete in C++ code.

Pros: Detailed allocation traces; GUI; free. Cons: Overhead; memory-only.

15. NVIDIA Nsight

Description: For GPU-accelerated C++ (CUDA/OpenGL). Includes Systems for timelines, Compute for kernels.

Type: GPU, CPU (sampling/instrumentation).

Platforms: Windows, Linux.

How to Use:

  • Launch Nsight, profile CUDA app.
  • Example: Analyze kernel launches in C++ CUDA code.

Pros: Deep GPU insights; free for NVIDIA users. Cons: GPU-focused; requires NVIDIA hardware.

Other notable ones: Apple Instruments (macOS, time/memory); AQTime (Windows, comprehensive but paid); Glowcode (Windows, intuitive); Optick (cross-platform, low-overhead for games); RAD Telemetry (commercial, game-focused); Score-P/TAU/HPCToolkit (HPC, parallel apps); Caliper (annotation-based).

Comparison of C++ Profilers

Use the table below for a high-level comparison. Ratings are subjective based on community feedback (e.g., ease: 1-5, 5=easiest; overhead: low/medium/high).

Profiler Type(s) Platforms Cost Ease of Use Overhead Multi-Thread Support GUI Quality Best For
gprof CPU Linux/Unix Free 3 Medium Poor None Basic function timing
perf CPU/Mem/Cache Linux Free 3 Low Good Basic (via tools) System-wide analysis
Valgrind CPU/Mem/Cache/Threads Linux/macOS Free 4 High Excellent Good (kcachegrind) Debugging leaks/races
Intel VTune CPU/Mem/Threads/GPU Win/Linux/macOS Paid 4 Low-Medium Excellent Excellent Hardware optimization
AMD uProf/Omnitrace CPU/Mem/GPU Win/Linux Free/Paid 3 Low Excellent Good AMD hardware/GPU
VS Profiler CPU/Mem/Threads Windows Free (w/VS) 5 Low Good Excellent Windows dev
Tracy CPU/GPU/Mem/Threads Cross-platform Free 4 Low Excellent Excellent Real-time games
Superluminal CPU/Threads Win/Xbox/PS Paid 5 Low Excellent Excellent Games/consoles
Oprofile CPU/Cache Linux Free 2 Low Fair None Legacy system profiling
gperftools CPU/Mem Linux Free 3 Low Fair Basic Heap leaks
Very Sleepy CPU Windows Free 4 Low Fair Basic Quick Windows checks
Coz Causal/CPU Linux Free 3 Low Good Basic Optimization experiments
Hotspot CPU (perf GUI) Linux Free 4 Low Good Good Visual perf data
Heaptrack Memory Linux Free 4 Medium Good Good Heap analysis
NVIDIA Nsight GPU/CPU Win/Linux Free 3 Low-Medium Good Excellent CUDA/GPU apps

In summary, for Linux devs, start with perf/Valgrind; Windows: VS Profiler/Superluminal; cross-platform/games: Tracy. Combine tools (e.g., perf with Hotspot) for best results. Always profile in release builds with optimizations, and compare before/after changes. For 2025, trends favor low-overhead, AI-assisted analysis, but these classics remain foundational.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment