TimSC

//Generate an RSA key pair, sign a message and verify it using crypto++ 5.6.1 or later.
//By Tim Sheerman-Chase, 2013
//This code is in the public domain and CC0
//To compile: g++ gen.cpp -lcrypto++ -o gen

#include <string>
using namespace std;
#include <crypto++/rsa.h>
#include <crypto++/osrng.h>
#include <crypto++/base64.h>

lh3

#include <math.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

#define RADIX 2.0

/*************************
 * balance a real matrix *
 *************************/

paniq

Below I collected relevant links and papers more or less pertaining to the subject of tetrahedral meshes. 
It's an ever-growing list.

------------------------------
Relevant links: 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Types_of_mesh
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrahedron
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplicial_complex

kkrolikowski

/*
 * randomize.c -- generate random file name
 * Author: Krzysztof Krolikowski <kkrolikowski@gamil.com>
 * compilation:
 * gcc -o randomize randomize.c
 * running:
 *  ~$ ./randomize
 *  dyndns_nBXGV0cW
 *
 */

dougpuob

/*


# How To Get Information from Authenticode Signed Executables
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/323809/how-to-get-information-from-authenticode-signed-executables

## Summary
You can use the WinVerifyTrust() API to verify an Authenticode signed executable. 

Although a signature is verified, a program may also have to do the following:

d3x0r

Marching Diamond Crystal Lattice

Git Repository

https://github.com/d3x0r/MarchingTetrahedra

Marching Diamond Crystal Lattice Detail

probonopd

Think twice before abandoning X11. Wayland breaks everything!

tl;dr: Wayland is not "the future", it is merely an incompatible alternative to the established standard with a different set of priorities and goals.

Wayland breaks everything! It is binary incompatible, provides no clear transition path with 1:1 replacements for everything in X11, and is even philosophically incompatible with X11. Hence, if you are interested in existing applications to "just work" without the need for adjustments, then you may be better off avoiding Wayland.

Wayland solves no issues I have but breaks almost everything I need. Even the most basic, most simple things (like xkill) - in this case with no obvious replacement. And usually it stays broken, because the Wayland folks mostly seem to care about Automotive, Gnome, maybe KDE - and alienating e