Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@probonopd
Last active July 23, 2025 08:31
Show Gist options
  • Save probonopd/9feb7c20257af5dd915e3a9f2d1f2277 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save probonopd/9feb7c20257af5dd915e3a9f2d1f2277 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Think twice about Wayland. It breaks everything!

Think twice before abandoning X11. Wayland breaks everything!

image

Source: https://x.com/LundukeJournal/status/1940441670098809093

Wayland breaks everything! It is binary incompatible, provides no clear transition path with 1:1 replacements for everything in X11, and is even philosophically incompatible with X11. Hence, if you are interested in existing applications to "just work" without the need for adjustments, then you may be better off avoiding Wayland.

Wayland solves no issues I have but breaks almost everything I need. Even the most basic, most simple things (like xkill) - in this case with no obvious replacement. And usually it stays broken, because the Wayland folks mostly seem to care about Automotive, Gnome, maybe KDE - and alienating everyone else (e.g., people using just an X11 window manager or something like GNUstep) in the process.

Feature comparison

Please do fact-check and suggest corrections/improvements below. Maybe this table should find its home in a Wiki, so that everyone could easily collaborate. I'm just a bit fearful of vandalism... ideas?

✅ Supported ⚠️ Available with limitations ❌ Not available or only available on some systems (requires particular compositors or additional software which may not be present on every system)

Functionality Xorg Wayland
Nvidia GPUs ✅ Well supported by proprietary Nvidia driver, also older hardware (open source driver Nouveau never worked satisfactorily) ⚠️ Only recent hardware
Multi-monitor ✅ Supported via XRandR, Xinerama (TheServerHost, KDE Blog) ✅ Stable, dynamic hotplug, better multi-monitor support (KDE Blog, CBT Nuggets)
Multi-resolution Multi-screen Support ✅ Can be done (there was a recent blog post somewhere); mixed refresh rates, Reddit ✅ Per-output resolutions and per-output scaling with sharp rendering (CBT Nuggets, EndeavourOS Forum)
Cropping and Scaling ✅ Per monitor with XRandR (xrandr manpage) wp_viewporter, wp_fractional_scale_manager_v1, per-window ("surface") cropping (Wayland Protos, KDE Dev)
Screen Recording / Capture ✅ Supported via X APIs; easy screen & window recording (Xlib Manual, OBS Wiki) ❌ Not natively available—wlr-screencopy and/or ext-image-copy-capture can be used without Portals but may not be present on every system. Otherwise requires Screencast Portal, which may not be present on every system (GNOME Docs, PipeWire Portal FAQ).
Input Devices / Event Routing XInput, XInput2, global intercept (XInput2 Docs) ❌ Input routed only to focused window ("surface"), no global interception (Wayland FAQ, Wayland Security)
Input Injection ✅ Via XTEST, XSendEvent (XTEST Spec) ❌ Not natively available—requires Remote Desktop Portal, which may not be present on every system (libei GH, KDE Input) . Workaround: /dev/uinput should work everywhere.
Global Hotkeys / Key Grabs XGrabKey()/XGrabButton() (Xlib Docs) ❌ Not natively available—requires Global Shortcuts Portal, which may not be present on every system (Portal Docs, KDE)
Window Positioning / Stacking ✅ Clients move/resize windows (Xlib Ref) ❌ Only compositor controls window positioning (Wayland FAQ, KDE Dev)
Clipboard Access ✅ Full/explicit, ICCCM selections (ICCCM) ❌ Not natively available—requires Clipboard Portal, which may not be present on every system (Clipboard Portal, Wayland FAQ)
Drag and Drop / Copy and Paste ✅ Xdnd, Motif (Xdnd Spec), Motif (Motif DND) wl_data_offer, wl_data_device_manager (Wayland Protos, KDE Drag&Drop)
Touch / Gesture Support XInput2 (XInput Multi-Touch) wl_touch, gestures via zwp_pointer_gestures_v1 (Wayland Protos)
Tablet Support XInput2 (libinput Tablet) zwp_tablet_manager_v2 (Wayland Protos)
Remote Display / Network Transparency ✅ X11 protocol, SSH forwarding (OpenBSD FAQ, XForwarding) ❌ Not natively available—requires Remote Desktop Portal, which may not be present on every system (Wayland FAQ)
Screen Configuration XRandR direct (xrandr manpage) ❌ Only compositor can set layout; clients have no access (KDE Dev). Supported by some compositors which may not be present on every system via wlr-output-management and associated tools like wlr-randr.
Window Management Hints (size, position) XSetWMHints, XSetNormalHints (ICCCM) ❌ Position not supported, only size
Window Title / Icon Name XSetWMName, XSetIconName (ICCCM) xdg_toplevel.set_title/set_icon (xdg-shell)
Window State (iconic, withdrawn, etc.) XSetWMState (ICCCM) ❌ Not exposed to clients; handled by compositor (Wayland FAQ)
Window Protocols (WM_DELETE_WINDOW) ✅ ICCCM, WM_DELETE_WINDOW (ICCCM) xdg_toplevel.close (xdg-shell)
Window Class / Instance XSetClassHint (ICCCM) ❌ Not supported (Wayland FAQ)
Window Transience (dialogs, popups) XSetTransientForHint (ICCCM) xdg_toplevel.set_parent (xdg-shell)
Input Focus (active window) XSetInputFocus (Xlib Ref) ❌ Managed by compositor (Wayland FAQ)
Selections ✅ Selections (ICCCM) ❌ Not natively available—requires Clipboard Portal, which may not be present on every system (Clipboard Portal, Wayland FAQ)
Drag and Drop ✅ Motif/Xdnd (Xdnd Spec) ✅ Native protocol (Wayland/Drag&Drop)
Window Grouping XSetWMHints group (ICCCM) ❌ No concept/protocol for grouping (Wayland FAQ)
Input Model / Input Hint ✅ Input model hints (ICCCM) ❌ Not exposed/natively supported (Wayland FAQ)
Window Manager Communication ✅ ICCCM client-to-WM (ICCCM) ❌ No standard protocol (Wayland FAQ)
Colormap / Visual hints ✅ Colormap per ICCCM (ICCCM) ⚠️ Handled by compositor (Wayland FAQ)
Icon Pixmap / Bitmap ✅ ICCCM icon hints (ICCCM) xdg_toplevel.set_icon (xdg-shell)
Urgency Hint XUrgencyHint (ICCCM) ❌ Not standardized; up to compositor (Wayland FAQ)
Window Shade (roll up/down) WM_STATE (mapped/unmapped state) ❌ Not supported
Window Always On Top (z-order) ✅ Applications can request stacking/z-order via WM_HINTS, window group, _NET_WM_STATE_ABOVE (EWMH) ❌ Not supported
Exclusive Display Control / DRM Leasing ⚠️ No protocol, possible with libdrm (libdrm) wp_drm_lease_v1 (Wayland Protos)
Transparency / Compositing ⚠️ With composite extension/compton/picom (wiki.archlinux) ✅ Built-in; always composited (Wayland FAQ)
Color Management ⚠️ Apps/loaders like xiccd (XCM docs) wp-color-manager-v1 (Wayland Protos)
VSync / Tear-free Rendering ⚠️ Inconsistent, needs correct driver/config (AskUbuntu) ✅ Guaranteed by compositor; always tear-free (Wayland FAQ)
Security / App Isolation ⚠️ Via extensions, e.g., Xnamespace extension (The Register) ⚠️ Wayland tries to separate applications from each other. As a result, applications can't do many things ("We're treated like hostile threat actors on our own workstations")
Click into a window to terminate the application xkill ❌ Not natively available—some compositors may have proprietary mechanisms, which may not be present on every system
Click into a window to see its metadata xprop ❌ Not supported
Set and get metadata (properties) on windows to exchange information regarding windows ✅ X Atoms (Docs) ❌ Not supported
One window server used by virtually all desktop environments and distributions ✅ Xorg (and Xlibre) ❌ Every desktop environment comes with a different compositor, which behaves differently, supports different features and has different bugs

Status update

Update 06/2025: X11 is alive and well, despite what Red Hat wants you to believe. https://github.com/X11Libre/xserver revitalizes the Xorg X11 server as a community project under new leadership.

And Red Hat wanted to silence it.


As 2024 is winding down:

For the record, even in the latest Raspberry Pi OS you still can't drag a file from inside a zip file onto the desktop for it to be extracted. So drag-and-drop is still broken for me.

And Qt move() on a window still doesn't work like it does on all other desktop platforms (and the Wayland folks think that is good).

And global menus still don't work (outside of not universally implemented things like qt_extended_surface set_generic_property).

Wayland issues

The Wayland project seems to operate like they were starting a greenfield project, whereas at the same time they try to position Wayland as "the X11 successor", which would clearly require a lot of thought about not breaking, or at least providing a smooth upgrade path for, existing software.

In fact, it is merely an incompatible alternative, and not even one that has (nor wants to have) feature parity (missing features). And unlike X11 (the X Window System), Wayland protocol designers actively avoid the concept of "windows" (making up incomprehensible words like "xdg_toplevel" instead).

DO NOT USE A WAYLAND SESSION! Let Wayland not destroy everything and then have other people fix the damage it caused. Or force more Red Hat/Gnome components (glib, Portals, Pipewire) on everyone!

Please add more examples to the list.

Wayland seems to be made by people who do not care for existing software. They assume everyone is happy to either rewrite everything or to just use Gnome on Linux (rather than, say, twm with ROX Filer on NetBSD).

Edit: When I wrote the above, I didn't really realize what Wayland even was, I just noticed that some distributions (like Fedora) started pushing it onto me and things didn't work properly there. Today I realize that you can't "install Wayland", because unlike Xorg, there is not one "Wayland display server" but actually every desktop envrironment has its own. And maybe "the Wayland folks" don't "only care about Gnome", but then, any fix that is done in Gnome's Wayland implementation isn't automatically going to benefit all users of Wayland-based software, and possibly isn't even the implementation "the Wayland folks" would necessarily recommend.

Edit 12/2023: If something wants to replace X11 for desktop computers (such as professional Unix workstations), then it better support all needed features (and key concepts, like windows) for that use case. That people also have displays on their fridge doesn't matter the least bit in that context of discussion. Let's propose the missing Wayland protocols for full X11 feature parity.

Edit 08/2024: "Does Wayland becoming the defacto standard display server for Linux serve to marginalize BSD?" https://fossforce.com/2024/07/the-unintended-consequences-linuxs-wayland-adoption-will-have-on-bsd/

Wayland is broken by design

  • A crash in the window manager takes down all running applications
  • You cannot run applications as root
  • You cannot do a lot of things that you can do in Xorg by design
  • There is not one /usr/bin/wayland display server application that is desktop environment agnostic and is used by everyone (unlike with Xorg)
  • It offloads a lot of work to each and every window manager. As a result, the same basic features get implemented differently in different window managers, with different behaviors and bugs - so what works on desktop environment A does not necessarily work in desktop environment B (e.g., often you hear that something "works in Wayland", even though it only really works on Gnome and KDE, not in all Wayland implementations). This summarizes it very well: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/issues/233

Apparently the Wayland project doesn't even want to be "X.org 2.0", and doesn't want to provide a commonly used implementation of a compositor that could be used by everyone: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/-/issues/233. Yet this would imho be required if they want to make it into a worthwile "successor" that would have any chance of ever fixing the many Wayland issues at the core.

Wayland breaks screen recording applications

  • MaartenBaert/ssr#431 ❌ broken since 24 Jan 2016, no resolution ("I guess they use a non-standard GNOME interface for this")
  • https://github.com/mhsabbagh/green-recorder ❌ ("I am no longer interested in working with things like ffmpeg/wayland/GNOME's screencaster or solving the issues related to them or why they don't work")
  • vkohaupt/vokoscreenNG#51 ❌ broken since at least 7 Mar 2020. ("I have now decided that there will be no Wayland support for the time being. Reason, there is no budget for it. Let's see how it looks in a year or two.") - This is the key problem. Wayland breaks everything and then expects others to fix the wreckage it caused on their own expense.
  • obsproject/obs-studio#2471 ❌ broken since at least 7 Mar 2020. ("Wayland is unsupported at this time", "There isn't really something that can just be easily changed. Wayland provides no capture APIs")
  • There is a workaround for OBS Studio that requires a obs-xdg-portal plugin (which is known to be Red Hat/Flatpak-centric, GNOME-centric, "perhaps" works with other desktops)
  • phw/peek#1191 ❌ broken since 14 Jan 2023. Peek, a screen recording tool, has been abandoned by its developerdue to a number of technical challenges, mostly with Gtk and Wayland ("Many of these have to do with how Wayland changed the way applications are being handled")

As of February 2024, screen recording is still broken utterly on Wayland with the vast majority of tools. Proof

Workaround: Find a Wayland compositor that supports the wlr-screencopy-unstable-v1 protocol and use wf-recorder -a. The default compositor in Raspberry Pi OS (Wayfire) does, but the default compositor in Ubuntu doesn't. (That's the worst part of Wayland: Unlike with Xorg, it always depends on the particular Wayand compositor what works and what is broken. Is there even one that supports everything?)

Wayland breaks screen sharing applications

  • jitsi/jitsi-meet#2350 ❌ broken since 3 Jan 2018
  • jitsi/jitsi-meet#6389 ❌ broken since 24 Jan 2016 ("Closing since there is nothing we can do from the Jitsi Meet side.") See? Wayland breaks stuff and leaves application developers helpless and unable to fix the breakage, even if they wanted.

NOTE: As of November 2023, screen sharing in Chromium using Jitsi Meet is still utterly broken, both in Raspberry Pi OS Desktop, and in a KDE Plasma installation, albeit with different behavior. Note that Pipewire, Portals and whatnot are installed, and even with them it does not work.

Wayland breaks automation software

sudo pkg install py37-autokey

This is an X11 application, and as such will not function 100% on 
distributions that default to using Wayland instead of Xorg.

Wayland breaks Gnome-Global-AppMenu (global menus for Gnome)

Wayland broke global menus with KDE platformplugin

Good news: According to this report global menus now work with KDE platformplugin as of 4/2022

Wayland breaks global menus with non-KDE Qt platformplugins

Wayland breaks AppImages that don't ship a special Wayland Qt plugin

  • https://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2018/03/unsetting-qt_qpa_platform-environment-variable-by-default/ ❌ broke AppImages that don't ship a special Wayland Qt plugin. "This affects proprietary applications, FLOSS applications bundled as appimages, FLOSS applications bundled as flatpaks and not distributed by KDE and even the Qt installer itself. In my opinion this is a showstopper for running a Wayland session." However, there is a workaround: "AppImages which ship just the XCB plugin will automatically fallback to running in xwayland mode" (see below).

Wayland breaks Redshift

Update 2023: Some Wayland compositors (such as Wayfire) now support wlr_gamma_control_unstable_v1, see https://github.com/WayfireWM/wayfire/wiki/Tutorial#configuring-wayfire and jonls/redshift#663. Does it work in all Wayland compositors though?

Wayland breaks global hotkeys

Wayland does not work for Xfce?

See below.

Wayland does not work properly on NVidia hardware?

Apparently Wayland relies on nouveau drivers for NVidia hardware. The nouveau driver has been giving unsatisfactory performance since its inception. Even clicking on the application starter icon in Gnome results in a stuttery animation. Only the proprietary NVidia driver results in full performance.

See below.

Update 2024: The situation might slowly be improving. It remains to be seen whether this will work well also for all existing old Nvidia hardware (that works well in Xorg).

Wayland does not work properly on Intel hardware

Wayland prevents GUI applications from running as root

  • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274451 ❌ broken since 22 Oct 2015 ("No this will only fix sudo for X11 applications. Running GUI code as root is still a bad idea." I absolutely detest it when software tries to prevent me from doing what some developer thinks is "a bad idea" but did not consider my use case, e.g., running truss for debugging on FreeBSD needs to run the application as root. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1323302 suggests it is not possible: "These sorts of security considerations are very much the way that "the Linux desktop" is going these days".)

Suggested solution

Wayland is biased toward Linux and breaks BSD

  • https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/wayland_on_netbsd_trials_and ❌ broken since 28 Sep 2020 ("Wayland is written with the assumption of Linux to the extent that every client application tends to #include <linux/input.h> because Wayland's designers didn't see the need to define a OS-neutral way to get mouse button IDs. (...) In general, Wayland is moving away from the modularity, portability, and standardization of the X server. (...) I've decided to take a break from this, since it's a fairly huge undertaking and uphill battle. Right now, X11 combined with a compositor like picom or xcompmgr is the more mature option."

Wayland complicates server-side window decorations

  • https://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2018/01/server-side-decorations-and-wayland/ ❌ FUD since at least 27 January 2018 ("I heard that GNOME is currently trying to lobby for all applications implementing client-side decorations. One of the arguments seems to be that CSD is a must on Wayland. " ... "I’m burnt from it and are not interested in it any more.") Server-side window decorations are what make the title bar and buttons of all windows on a system consistent. They are a must have_ for a consistent system, so that applications written e.g., Gtk will not look entirely alien on e.g., a Qt based desktop, and to enforce that developers cannot place random controls into window titles where they do not belong. Client-side decorations, on the other hand, are destroying uniformity and consistency, put additional burden on application and toolkit developers, and allow e.g., GNOME developers to put random controls (that do not belong there) into window titles (like buttons), hence making it more difficult to achieve a uniform look and feel for all applications regardless of the toolkit being used.

Red Hat employee Matthias Clasen ("I work at the Red Hat Desktop team... I am actually a manager there... the people who do the actual work work for me") expicitly stated "Client-side everything" as a principle, even though the protocol doesn't enforce it: "Fonts, Rendering, Nested Windows, Decorations. "It also gives the design more freedom to use the titlebar space, which is something our designers appreciate" (sic). Source

Wayland breaks windows rasing/activating themselves

Wayland breaks RescueTime

Wayland breaks window managers

Apparently Wayland (at least as implemented in KWin) does not respect EWMH protocols, and breaks other command line tools like wmctrl, xrandr, xprop, etc. Please see the discussion below for details.

Wayland requires JWM, TWM, XDM, IceWM,... to reimplement Xorg-like functionality

  • Screen recording and casting
  • Querying of the mouse position, keyboard LED state, active window position or name, moving windows (xdotool, wmctrl)
  • Global shortcuts
  • System tray
  • Input Method support/editor (IME)
  • Graphical settings management (i.e. tools like xranrd)
  • Fast user switching/multiple graphical sessions
  • Session configuration including but not limited to 1) input devices 2) monitors configuration including refresh rate / resolution / scaling / rotation and power saving 3) global shortcuts
  • HDR/deep color support
  • VRR (variable refresh rate)
  • Disabling input devices (xinput alternative)

As it currently stands minor WMs and DEs do not even intend to support Wayland given the sheer complexity of writing all the code required to support the above features. You do not expect JWM, TWM, XDM or even IceWM developers to implement all the featured outlined in ^1.

Wayland breaks _NET_WM_STATE_SKIP_TASKBAR protocol

  • https://git.521000.bestelectron/electron#33226 ("skipTaskbar has no effect on Wayland. Currently Electron uses _NET_WM_STATE_SKIP_TASKBAR to tell the WM to hide an app from the taskbar, and this works fine on X11 but there's no equivalent mechanism in Wayland." Workarounds are only available for some desktops including GNOME and KDE Plasma.) ❌ broken since March 10, 2022

Wayland breaks NoMachine NX

Wayland breaks xclip

xclip is a command line utility that is designed to run on any system with an X11 implementation. It provides an interface to X selections ("the clipboard"). Apparently Wayland isn't compatible to the X11 clipboard either.

This is another example that the Wayland requires everyone to change components and take on additional work just because Wayland is incompatible to what we had working for all those years.

Wayland breaks SUDO_ASKPASS

Wayland breaks auto-type in password managers

Wayland breaks X11 atoms

X11 atoms can be used to store information on windows. For example, a file manager might store the path that the window represents in an X11 atom, so that it (and other applications) can know for which paths there are open file manager windows. Wayland is not compatible to X11 atoms, resulting in all software that relies on them to be broken until specifically ported to Wayland (which, in the case of legacy software, may well be never).

Possible workaround (to be verified): Use the (Qt proprietary?) Extended Surface Wayland protocol casually mentioned in https://blog.broulik.de/2016/10/global-menus-returning/ "which allows you to set (and read?) arbitrary properties on a window". Is it the set_generic_property from https://github.com/qt/qtwayland/blob/dev/src/extensions/surface-extension.xml?

Wayland breaks games

Games are developed for X11. And if you run a game on Wayland, performance is subpar due to things like forced vsync. Only recently, some Wayland implementations (like KDE KWin) let you disable that.

Wayland breaks xdotool

(Details to be added; apparently no 1:1 drop-in replacement available?)

Wayland breaks xkill

xkill (which I use on a regular basis) does not work with Wayland applications.

What is the equivalent for Wayland applications?

Wayland breaks screensavers

Is it true that Wayland also breaks screensavers? https://www.jwz.org/blog/2023/09/wayland-and-screen-savers/

Wayland breaks setting the window position

Other platforms (Windows, Mac, other destop environments) can set the window position on the screen, so all cross-platform toolkits and applications expect to do the same on Wayland, but Wayland can't (doesn't want to) do it.

  • PCSX2/pcsx2#10179 PCX2 (Playstation 2 Emulator) ❌ broken since 2023-10-25 ("Disables Wayland, it's super broken/buggy in basically every scenario. KDE isn't too buggy, GNOME is a complete disaster.")

  • Wayland might allow the compositor (not: the application) to set window positions, but that means that as an application author, I can't do anything but wait for KDE to implement https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15329 - and even then, it will only work under KDE, not Gnome or elsewhere. Big step backward compared to X11!

Wayland breaks color mangement

Apparently color management as of 2023 (well over a decade of Wayland development) is still in the early "thinking" stage, all the while Wayland is already being pushed on people as if it was a "X11 successor".

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pq/color-and-hdr/-/blob/main/doc/color-management-model.md

Wayland breaks DRM leasing

According to Valve, "DRM leasing is the process which allows SteamVR to take control of your VR headset's display in order to present low-latency VR content".

Wayland breaks In-home Streaming

Wayland breaks NetWM

Extended Window Manager Hints, a.k.a. NetWM, is an X Window System standard for the communication between window managers and applications

Wayland breaks window icons

Update 6/2024: Looks like this will get unbroken thanks to xdg_toplevel_icon_manager_v1, so that QWindow::setIcon will work again. If, and that's a big if, all compositors will support it. At least KDE is on it.

Wayland breaks drag and drop

Wayland breaks ./windowmanager --replace

  • Many window managers have a --replace argument, but Wayland compositors break this convention.

Wayland breaks Xpra

Xpra is an open-source multi-platform persistent remote display server and client for forwarding applications and desktop screens.

  • Under Xpra a context menu cannot be used: it opens and closes automatically before you can even move the mouse on it. "It's not just GDK, it's the Wayland itself. They decided to break existing applications and expect them to change how they work." (Xpra-org/xpra#4246) ❌ broken since 2024-06-01

Wayland breaks multi desktop docks

  • "Unfortunately Wayland is not designed to support multi desktop dock projects. This is why each DE using Wayland is building their own custom docks. Plus there is a lot of complexity to support Wayland based apps and also merge that data with apps running in Xwayland. A dock isn't useful unless it knows about every window and app running on the system." zquestz/plank-reloaded#70 ❌ broken since 2025-06-10

Xwayland breaks window resizing

Workarounds

  • Users: Refuse to use Wayland sessions. Uninstall desktop environments/Linux distributions that only ship Wayland sessions. Avoid Wayland-only applications (such as PreSonus Studio One) (potential workaround: run in https://github.com/cage-kiosk/cage)
  • Application developers: Enforce running applications on X11/XWayland (like LibrePCB does as of 11/2023)

Examples of Wayland being forced on users

This is exactly the kind of behavior this gist seeks to prevent.

Summary what is wrong with Wayland, by one of its contributors

image

Source: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/issues/179#note_2965661

History

  • 2008: Wayland was started by krh (while at Red Hat)
  • End of 2012: Wayland 1.0
  • Early 2013: GNOME begins Wayland porting

Source: "Where's Wayland?" by Matthias Clasen - Flock 2014

A decade later... Red Hat wants to force Wayland upon everyone, removing support for Xorg

What now?

Following the professional application KiCad's advice:

Recommendations for Users

For Professional Use

If you use KiCad professionally or require a reliable, full-featured experience, we strongly recommend:

Use X11-based desktop environments such as:

XFCE with X11 KDE Plasma with X11 MATE

Traditional desktop environments that maintain X11 support

Install X11-compatible display managers like LightDM or KDM instead of GDM if your distribution defaults to Wayland-only

Choose distributions that maintain X11 support - some distributions are moving to Wayland-only configurations that may not meet your needs

Source: https://www.kicad.org/blog/2025/06/KiCad-and-Wayland-Support/#

Similarly, for Krite: https://www.davidrevoy.com/article1030/debian-12-kde-plasma-2024-install-guide#d-krita-as-appimage

References

@guiodic
Copy link

guiodic commented Jul 22, 2025

You were trolled by KDE redditor

It didn't happen that way but think what you will.

@Ro-Den
Copy link

Ro-Den commented Jul 22, 2025

To be fair, KDE folks here told us explicitly that X11 is not even tested anymore, so why bother? I know lack of testing is normal in open source world but it's obvious what they meant is that they are not interested in keeping X11 supported.

The best way right now is to either stick with Plasma 5 or switch to another DE. Let's turn Plasma 6 into KDE's Windows Vista (even the version numbers are the same );

@reaperx7
Copy link

reaperx7 commented Jul 22, 2025

Losing KDE to me is inconsequential. It's an overbloated desktop environment anyway that's all flash and bang and very little substance anymore. I prefer a minimal resource desktop environment like Xfce anyway.

I can easily supplicant anything from KDE with other tools. Even MATE and Trinity are better at this point.

Yeah, let them have their Vista moment of clarity. We all remember how well Vista went over. I honestly really don't even use anything from KDE at all to be very honest. Even the desktop packages interfere with other apps and games, and they love blaming the other guy for their fault.

@JRRandall
Copy link

For those who told me to post my patch upstream in kwin-x11-improved They obviously rejected it why kwin-x11 is feature frozen: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507357

To be fair, KDE folks here told us explicitly that X11 is not even tested anymore, so why bother? I know lack of testing is normal in open source world but it's obvious what they meant is that they are not interested in keeping X11 supported. Seems like joke's on you.

More than one guy on reddit, even with a 'kde contributor' badge, told me to send the patch upstream. I refused at first, then did it to show him what would happen.

Their rationale on rejecting it is insane. It's not a new feature, it's fixing a bug in their DE.

@reaperx7
Copy link

It's not a new feature, it's fixing a bug in their DE.

X11 is a bug on its own, thankfully we have a fix for it

You guys never fixed the issue with Minecraft your software caused and still causes. Own up to your own problems before blaming other projects first instead of being a narcissistic hypocrite.

@Loonekud
Copy link

You guys never fixed the issue with Minecraft your software caused and still causes. Own up to your own problems before blaming other projects first instead of being a narcissistic hypocrite.

How would you know? Since "Losing KDE to me is inconsequential"

@guiodic
Copy link

guiodic commented Jul 22, 2025

Hadi confirmed me a few days ago

Who is Hadi? Can you link this "confirmation"?

@Loonekud
Copy link

Probono's working overtime to delete my comments, if only BSD also worked

@probonopd
Copy link
Author

...and with that, back to the topic: Why Wayland is not a suitable replacement for X11, and why we still need the latter.

@guiodic
Copy link

guiodic commented Jul 22, 2025

And, why are you anonymous? Are you afraid of something?

@guiodic
Copy link

guiodic commented Jul 22, 2025

Losing KDE to me is inconsequential. It's an overbloated desktop environment anyway that's all flash and bang and very little substance anymore. I prefer a minimal resource desktop environment like Xfce anyway.

For goodness sake, everyone has their own taste. I prefer KDE because it has a myriad of features and is totally configurable (well, with Wayland it is less so). Also, many apps are really good, although usually those born outside KDE (like Kdenlive).

@guiodic
Copy link

guiodic commented Jul 22, 2025

However, I did use the kwin-x11 backend rather than wayland due to functionality issues with wayland and other apps like OBS and such requiring too many workaround plugins to do one simple task. I don't need the buggy xdg plugin for OBS that works only when it wants to and creates a memory leak.

For me gpu-screen-recorder is enough.

KDE is the poster child of a project that got too big for itself to be properly maintained by developers who actually take bug reports seriously.

That's true. And this is why they like Wayland so much. Because its limits, thay have someone else to blame. "We are waiting for a new protocol" is the standard reply to bug reports.

To them, bug reports are a joke, a meme, and are more of an offense against them for someone calling out their ineptitude towards their stuff. How dare the user call them out for their code that is perfection incarnate?

This is pretty the rule in open source. Gnome devs are even worst of Kde ones.

@JRRandall
Copy link

That's true. And this is why they like Wayland so much. Because its limits, thay have someone else to blame. "We are waiting for a new protocol" is the standard reply to bug reports.

More conspiracy theory bullshit!

Here’s a conspiracy for you. Wayland breaks global hot keys under the guise of “security”. Many such cases.

@myownfriend
Copy link

You claimed that this protocol is useful to restore the position and geometry of windows.

Yes, and it is.

Then you admitted that there is nothing in this protocol that is intended for that purpose.

I never said that. I literally said that compositor saves the applications compositor-side state which inherently includes position, scale, stacking order and whatever other state the compositor stores for it. The client then requests to restore it.

I don't know where your reading comprehension is failing you.

So you have proved me right.

Opposite. Proved you wrong.

However, you can't explain why after at least 10 years of "serious" Wayland development (the first release of Plasma with Wayland was in 2015) we are still waiting for the windows restore function. Since this protocol does not serve the purpose, couldn't windows restore have been done before?

Except it literally does serve that purpose. I really don't understand where you get off acting like you know anything about this protocol. When I first linked you to it, you said it was a protocol for restoring group a clients, which it isn't. Then when Consolitis did the same, you spent several posts arguing over the existence of the function in the protocol that doesn't exist. You even said that you read the protocol then finally after being pushed on it, you admitted that you didn't read the protocol and had ChatGPT go over it because less than 260 lines of text was too much for you to read.

Consolatis and I both provided you the MR for the protocol, too, where you can read through the summary of what the protocol does as well as all of the discussion about it. I will link it again. READ IT.

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/18

@myownfriend
Copy link

myownfriend commented Jul 23, 2025

Here’s a conspiracy for you. Wayland breaks global hot keys under the guise of “security”. Many such cases.

Answer a few questions for me.

Where is the X11 global hotkeys protocol?

Why would global hotkeys make any sense to implement in a windowing protocol when the entire point of global hotkeys is that they circumvent the input redirection that windows protocols do?

Does an X11 protocol allow applications within a nested X server to listen to input events outside of that server? If not, then how can Wayland "break" that functionality.

What is this? Can Wayland and X11 applications use it to use global hot keys?

Lastly, why is this topic reverting into talking about things that have already been answered?

@guiodic
Copy link

guiodic commented Jul 23, 2025

You claimed that this protocol is useful to restore the position and geometry of windows.

Yes, and it is.

Then you admitted that there is nothing in this protocol that is intended for that purpose.

I never said that. I literally said that compositor saves the applications compositor-side state which inherently includes position, scale, stacking order and whatever other state the compositor stores for it. The client then requests to restore it.

I don't know where your reading comprehension is failing you.

So you have proved me right.

Opposite. Proved you wrong.

However, you can't explain why after at least 10 years of "serious" Wayland development (the first release of Plasma with Wayland was in 2015) we are still waiting for the windows restore function. Since this protocol does not serve the purpose, couldn't windows restore have been done before?

Except it literally does serve that purpose. I really don't understand where you get off acting like you know anything about this protocol. When I first linked you to it, you said it was a protocol for restoring group a clients, which it isn't. Then when Consolitis did the same, you spent several posts arguing over the existence of the function in the protocol that doesn't exist. You even said that you read the protocol then finally after being pushed on it, you admitted that you didn't read the protocol and had ChatGPT go over it because less than 260 lines of text was too much for you to read.

Consolatis and I both provided you the MR for the protocol, too, where you can read through the summary of what the protocol does as well as all of the discussion about it. I will link it again. READ IT.

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/-/merge_requests/18

Summary is not an object, a method or a property. Summary does nothing. It is only words. None in the protocol is intended to save/restore geometry and position. Everything would be on compositor, if it save/restore geometry and position. So, it is the same situation as today without the protocol.

@myownfriend
Copy link

Summary is not an object, a method or a property. Summary does nothing. It is only words.

So you're still refusing to read the topic. I'm not surprised.

None in the protocol is intended to save/restore geometry and position.

I've asked you this before, what kind of per-app state does a compositor have?

Everything would be on compositor, if it save/restore geometry and position.

Oh so you're saying that a compositor would have geometry and position saved per app and that this protocol an application could restore that geometry and position?

So, it is the same situation as today without the protocol.

No, it's not. This was explained to you already but again, you can't don't/can't read. Right now each application can have multiple top level surfaces but they'd all the same app id so a compositor would not be able to tell which state belongs to which surfaces by app id alone. The only state that can be stored and restored reliably without that protocol is the dimensions of the surfaces because the client knows those and can store them themselves.

This protocol allows the application to add each top levels surface to the created session which gives each top level surface it's own id that the compositor can use to tell which state belongs to which surface.

The protocol also allows a client to register multiple sessions with the compositor and choose when to restore which state.

As a result of this protocol:

  1. A compositor can reliably restore the correct state to the correct surfaces instead of guessing.
  2. A client can choose to omit certain surfaces from the session, like dialogs.
  3. A client can switch between different stored sessions at run time for different layouts.

@JRRandall
Copy link

Here’s a conspiracy for you. Wayland breaks global hot keys under the guise of “security”. Many such cases.

Answer a few questions for me.

Where is the X11 global hotkeys protocol?

XGrabKey

Why would global hotkeys make any sense to implement in a windowing protocol when the entire point of global hotkeys is that they circumvent the input redirection that windows protocols do?

Maybe the user wants to map a keystroke to give to use to their favorite application, or some other workflow optimization is desired. Did you forget that users like freedom?

Does an X11 protocol allow applications within a nested X server to listen to input events outside of that server? If not, then how can Wayland "break" that functionality.

only one X server per host is ever needed. I’ve never personally tried to run multiple nested, so I don’t know. It’s irreverent though, because my point is that Wayland disallows global hotkeys by design.

What is this? Can Wayland and X11 applications use it to use global hot keys?

Use some other application to make up for Wayland’s crap design. Many such cases.

Lastly, why is this topic reverting into talking about things that have already been answered?

Because I want feature parity if Wayland is being forced on us by planned sunsetting of X11 support.

@Consolatis
Copy link

Here’s a conspiracy for you. Wayland breaks global hot keys under the guise of “security”. Many such cases.

No, it doesn't support global hotkeys because the action binder protocol is still not accepted.

Why would global hotkeys make any sense to implement in a windowing protocol when the entire point of global hotkeys is that they circumvent the input redirection that windows protocols do?

Because Wayland is not just about windowing. It is also about input routing. Usually you want global hotkeys to trigger some action and not be relayed to the focused window as well. Similar to keybinds from the compositor itself.

What is this? Can Wayland and X11 applications use it to use global hot keys?

Only if the compositor implements that dbus interface. There are compositors out there that do not use dbus at all.
Its a similar situation to screensharing, the reason that it works via the desktop portal on wlroots based compositors is that there is a separate application available (xdg-desktop-portal-wlr) which implements the dbus interface and then uses either the wlroots screencopy protocol or the upstream ext-image-copy-capture protocol to talk to the compositor. Something similar is required to make global hotkeys work via wayland itself but also via the desktop portal, at least for those compositors that do not want to handle dbus in their process and also do not want to maintain their own desktop-portal implementation + private wayland protocol (hyprland does this for example).

@guiodic
Copy link

guiodic commented Jul 23, 2025

As a result of this protocol:

  1. A compositor can reliably restore the correct state to the correct surfaces instead of guessing.
  2. A client can choose to omit certain surfaces from the session, like dialogs.
  3. A client can switch between different stored sessions at run time for different layouts.

99% apps have only 1 window, while dialog windows can easily be excluded. They could implement the save/restore years ago.
Anyway, all this story tell us that Wayland has not a reliable mechanism to identify a window. This is not surprising, Wayland was conceived for non-windowed interfaces. Its adaptation to general desktop required years and it's not completed after 17 years.

@reaperx7
Copy link

It'll take them another 17 years just to get another protocol implemented properly that isn't experimental.

@myownfriend
Copy link

XGrabKey

You know what. I always thought this was for checking key state, but now I'm seeing that it is a bit more explicitly for hot keys so I will bow my head on this one.

Maybe the user wants to map a keystroke to give to use to their favorite application, or some other workflow optimization is desired. Did you forget that users like freedom?

That wasn't a very good answer. It just described why someone would want to use a hotkey and not why it should be in a windowing protocol. Also I'm not a dumbass libertarian so saying "freedom" doesn't activate me like a sleeper agent.

Because Wayland is not just about windowing. It is also about input routing. Usually you want global hotkeys to trigger some action and not be relayed to the focused window as well. Similar to keybinds from the compositor itself.

That's a better answer: to avoid collisions with keybinds from the compositor.

only one X server per host is ever needed. I’ve never personally tried to run multiple nested, so I don’t know. It’s irreverent though, because my point is that Wayland disallows global hotkeys by design.

The answer is that nested server's can't see input unless the host server directs input to it, then it directs that input to it's clients. Wayland compositors don't run X11 applications, they run them in a nested X server called XWayland. If you have multiple X11 clients open, and one of them uses global hotkeys, then they'll work as long as one of the clients that's connected to the XWayland server is in in-focus. If a Wayland client is the in-focus window then hot key will not work because no input is being routed to the nested X server just like in X11.

So it's not "breaking" anything. It can't do it but it's not broken either.

Use some other application to make up for Wayland’s crap design. Many such cases.

How can it do such a thing if Wayland disallows applications from using global shortcuts?

Because I want feature parity if Wayland is being forced on us by planned sunsetting of X11 support.

Nobody is forcing shit on you. I swear, some people want to be victims so bad.

No, it doesn't support global hotkeys because the action binder protocol is still not accepted.

I actually wasn't aware of the action binder protocol. I just read up on it and I like the fact that includes gestures.

Only if the compositor implements that dbus interface. There are compositors out there that do not use dbus at all.
Its a similar situation to screensharing, the reason that it works via the desktop portal on wlroots based compositors is that there is a separate application available (xdg-desktop-portal-wlr) which implements the dbus interface and then uses either the wlroots screencopy protocol or the upstream ext-image-copy-capture protocol to talk to the compositor. Something similar is required to make global hotkeys work via wayland itself but also via the desktop portal, at least for those compositors that do not want to handle dbus in their process and also do not want to maintain their own desktop-portal implementation + private wayland protocol (hyprland does this for example).

I get that there's compositors that don't use dbus and don't want to. However, whether it's portals or some separate protocol, I do like the idea that things like screen sharing and global shortcuts can be done in a way that's agnostic to the windowing protocol so that applications can use the same code to implement the same features whether they're using X11, Wayland, or some new windowing protocol.

@myownfriend
Copy link

This is not surprising, Wayland was conceived for non-windowed interfaces.

No it wasn't. Weston has always had some form of windowing and that was made to be the Wayland reference compositor.

ChatGPT lied to you again.

@myownfriend
Copy link

It'll take them another 17 years just to get another protocol implemented properly that isn't experimental.

You're currently working on a color management protocol for X11 but have no idea how it's going to work at all. You'd think you'd have a bit more respect for people who have actually successfully done that already but I guess not.

I love this focus on Wayland's age as if X11 had all of it's features from day 1. X11 didn't get it's session management protocol until release 7.7 in 2004. That's 17 years after the release of X11. Now obviously X11's session management protocol isn't a direct analog to Wayland's but who cares about details like that when we can get around talking about the protocols all... the goddamn.... time. Right? Like we can talk about how things work for maybe five sentences every few posts but we can't go a single post without some needless shit slinging about it's history or the evil intentions of the people behind them or how you're being forced to something or some garbage like that.

Who gives a shit if it's been 17 years since the first commit in the Wayland repo? Wayland's client and server APIs weren't considered stable until July 2013. There's an utter discontent for developers in this thread.

@guiodic
Copy link

guiodic commented Jul 23, 2025

No it wasn't. Weston has always had some form of windowing and that was made to be the Wayland reference compositor.

Weston is younger than Wayland itself. If Wayland was intended to manage windows from the beginning, it would have window objects with their winId and other properties and the 4 years old experimental session protocol would be unuseful. The very fact that, after 17 years, they have introduced something like a winId is a clear proof of non-windowing nature of Wayland.
Consider that wayland is very different from any truly desktop-oriented platform. Both MS Windows and macOs have windows objects with their unique ids and properties, like X11. This is another proof that wayland was not conceived to manage windows.

@guiodic
Copy link

guiodic commented Jul 23, 2025

It'll take them another 17 years just to get another protocol implemented properly that isn't experimental.

You're currently working on a color management protocol for X11 but have no idea how it's going to work at all. You'd think you'd have a bit more respect for people who have actually successfully done that already but I guess not.

I love this focus on Wayland's age as if X11 had all of it's features from day 1. X11 didn't get it's session management protocol until release 7.7 in 2004. That's 17 years after the release of X11. Now obviously X11's session management protocol isn't a direct analog to Wayland's but who cares about details like that when we can get around talking about the protocols all... the goddamn.... time. Right? Like we can talk about how things work for maybe five sentences every few posts but we can't go a single post without some needless shit slinging about it's history or the evil intentions of the people behind them or how you're being forced to something or some garbage like that.

Who gives a shit if it's been 17 years since the first commit in the Wayland repo? Wayland's client and server APIs weren't considered stable until July 2013. There's an utter discontent for developers in this thread.

This is not a good excuse. Precisely because Xorg have a session manager since 21 years ago, Wayland has no justification.

@ismaell
Copy link

ismaell commented Jul 23, 2025 via email

@myownfriend
Copy link

myownfriend commented Jul 23, 2025

Weston is younger than Wayland itself.

Yea, it kind of has to be as a rule.

If Wayland was intended to manage windows from the beginning, it would have window objects with their winId and other properties and the 4 years old experimental session protocol would be unuseful.

That's bad logic. Compositors can assign an id to each top_surface as they connect to it which is perfectly fine for windowing within a session. They just don't have a the same id each time they reconnect.

The very fact that, after 17 years, they have introduced something like a winId is a clear proof of non-windowing nature of Wayland.

I'm really curious how you would make a new windowing protocol. I mean I don't think you'd make a very good one at all and you'd probably just make a clone of X11 with all of the same issues because you have no original ideas but I'd still love to see it.

Consider that wayland is very different from any truly desktop-oriented platform.

"Truly desktop-oriented" is crazy dismissive for a protocol that is definitely used for desktops.

Both MS Windows and macOs have windows objects with their unique ids and properties, like X11.

I don't give a shit whether it's like Windows or MacOs lol

This is another proof that wayland was not conceived to manage windows.

Accept it was and it does. Idk, I get this sense that you're not all that bright or creative. It's like you have no ability to talk about these things outside of this bitchy, Xbox Live-kid, all-or-nothing way. It feels like you don't know how to break problems down and go like "If this part has this and this part has this then you do this, this, and this even if you don't have this."

I legitimately feel like I'm the IGN boards in 2006 reading people talk about whether the PS3 or Xbox 360 is "more powerful". It's just dumb team A vs team B mush with enough technical words sprinkled in to sound like people are kind of talking about tech.

@myownfriend
Copy link

Implementing something new and getting it right is a lot of work, and it needs to be recognised. A lot of the shortcomings in "Wayland" are just implementation limitations and lack of a sufficiently good solution, so it's a matter of time, the same can be said about libraries and frameworks, but let's not pretend it's easy to come up with solutions for Xorg's X server shortcomings either. Ultimately, for a long time we've seen a disinterest in Xorg's xserver development, and Wayland is objectively doing better in terms of development pace, for whatever reason; on the X11 side that isn't something easy to fix and no one can singlehandedly solve it, it's a matter of reaching critical mass too.

This! Very much this!

@Ro-Den
Copy link

Ro-Den commented Jul 23, 2025

I love this focus on Wayland's age as if X11 had all of it's features from day 1.

The problem with your rotten logic is that the X Window System was one of the 1st, so nobody knew what would work and be appreciated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment