Suppose you're opening an issue and there's a lot noisey logs that may be useful.
Rather than wrecking readability, wrap it in a <details>
tag!
<details>
Summary Goes Here
#compdef swaymsg | |
typeset -A opt_args | |
__swaymsg() { | |
# Reuse socket path from command line if present | |
swaymsg ${(kv)opt_args[(I)-s|--socket]} "$@" 2>/dev/null | |
} | |
# _sway | |
# sway ipc {{{ |
Earliest known instance: https://www.reddit.com/r/sbubby/comments/d8buja/please/f1a4t74?context=3
Well well well. It appears [insert user who used the copypasta]
is a fellow vappy fucc connoisseur. However screw the female version. You get those same ol two holes in literally everything else. the MALE vappy is the real star of the show. Those long slippery diccs they have full mobility control with like a tentacle are the perfect ass filler for the ultimate in deep reaching experience nothing else could possibly provide. Naturally lubed at all times due to their aquatic hydrodynamic nature, you can pull off anywhere to the side of the road, or go into a public restroom at the beach, get each other aroused, and have the fucc of a lifetime. The extraordinary squishyness of the vappy alone rubbing against you would be enough to lose yourself in pleasure as it simply mounts you. Let alone with that perfect tool of pleasure slips into you. Its ability to snake around your bends and its perfect le
The open source community depends on the efforts of a small group of volunteers relative to the number of users. In order to make the most of contributors' time, here is some advice for asking “good questions”. This is largely paraphrased from this article by Eric Steven Raymond and Rick Moen, with edits for brevity and tone. If you have the time (and tolerance), I strongly recommend reading that article over this one. Let's start with the procedure.
Yoneda (and its duel Coyoneda) is well known in the Category Theory field and has been ported over to functional languages such as Haskell. Each have their uses - sometimes in similar scenarios, also in very different ways.
This will be a newbie's explanation of the concept, using Haskell to illustrate, without any Category Theory.
From what I've read, the Yonedas are not 'daily-drivers' (not used everyday), but rather can be pulled out when the time is right.
Uses: Both Yoneda's can be used to help speed up a program where there are many fmap
with long lists or big trees involved. Coyoneda can be used if you want to create an 'interface' and build up calculations, then pass those calculations to an 'executor' to run them.
# If you want to use this with rlwrap, the following command works for me | |
# > INPUTRC='~/.dyalog/inputrc' rlwrap -a dyalog -s -b | |
# Which can then be aliased to whatever you like | |
"`[": "←" | |
"`-": "×" | |
"`=": "÷" | |
"`p": "*" | |
"`*": "⍟" |
When I took "Fundamentals of Computer Science" in college, my professor was very adamant about the distinction between data and information and about how data doesn't have any inherent meaning. At the time, it seemed a bit silly to me how much emphasis he put on such a seemingly insignificant difference.
In retrospect, I think he was exactly right about this and I wish more programmers took it to heart.
Data is something you can store in a computer, such as, let's say, the byte 0b01000001
.