Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@Parihsz
Last active March 31, 2025 01:10
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save Parihsz/b31085b6e9a4b338cb3f813b3a20876a to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save Parihsz/b31085b6e9a4b338cb3f813b3a20876a to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Summary

This RFC proposes the adoption of Backpack instances in place of traditional Folder instances for container organization.

image

Motivation

As a roblox game scales, developers continually seek new paradigms for organizing code, modularity, and runtime clarity. Traditional Folder usage, while functional, lacks semantic weight and provides no affordance beyond being a generic instance container. Backpacks are specialized containers with actual implicit utility. Although they are deisgned to hold tools, it can be recontextualized as a general purpose container for scripts, services and components. Notably:

  • better developer ergonomics: a "Backpack" intuitively implies it "holds useful things", making it easier to conceptualize its contents as essential runtime modules.
  • visual distinction: differentiating functional containers from traditional folders make critical components much easier to profile.
  • toolchain compatibility: tooling and plugins built around inventory systems may extend functionality for devss using Backpack has logic containers

Design

Backpacks will need to be created with Instance.new("Backpack") and parented to any data container or service, where they will function identically to Folders

Drawbacks

  • Tool equivocation: developers unfamiliar with this pattern may mistake non player backpack instances to being related to tool systems, causing momentary confusion

Alternatives

  • do nothing: continue using folders
  • create a custom ModuleContainer class that provides semantic clarity
@isopod145
Copy link

This is catastrophically deficient in its logical underpinnings, teeming with spurious justifications and a flagrant disregard for fundamental technical realities. The assertion that Backpacks confer "implicit utility" is a ludicrous mischaracterization, as their intrinsic function pertains explicitly to player inventories, rendering their bastardized repurposing an exercise in obfuscation and unnecessary convolution. The purported enhancements to developer ergonomics and visual differentiation are nothing more than nebulous, hand-waving conjectures devoid of substantive validation and wholly inadequate to justify such an egregious departure from established paradigms. Moreover, this proposal presents no empirical substantiation of Folders being in any way deficient, nor does it contend with the inevitable logical landmines it introduces, such as errant game behavior stemming from the misinterpretation of Backpacks as inventory containers. The solitary drawback feebly acknowledged - "Tool equivocation" - is a woeful understatement of the catastrophic debugging and maintenance quagmires this misguided initiative would unleash. The alternatives section is anemic at best, bereft of any meaningful exploration of superior solutions such as refining Folder functionality or making a ModuleContainer class. In summation, this proposal engenders far more detriment than benefit, and rather than engaging in this imprudent and unwarranted subversion of intended class functionality, the far more sagacious course of action would be to either enhance Folders or devise a purpose-built instance type tailored to the purported use case. In its current state, this RFC is an unmitigated disaster and should be unequivocally discarded.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment