gistfile1.txt

Cultural appropriation is not an issue of racism, but an issue of capitalism, and the unfulfilled desire to be seen.
In this sense, it is no different than many other issues that come up ...


The freedom to dress, speak, and generally express oneself culturally, is no less an individuals right, as transrights are human rights.
How can cultural appreciation differenciated from cultural appropriation
How does this?

Is Facebook a form of cultural appropriation of the early IRC channels?
Is culture meant to go across borders, to connect
Or is it meant to be contained and isolated?

Who has the right to do that?
Was it in the mind of the originators to celebrate certain cultural aspects and how many of today's practicers do vote for it to be spread, and how many want to occupy it?
 

Cultural appropritation is a cringe marketing gag, born of the capitalistic desire to be seen