List of Accouns is Here contains JSON, CSV and Raw Text.
Accouts gathering using Like Blockers and below links are theirs API.
Changelog:
- 2022-09-19 (1 to 52)
- 2022-09-24 (53 to 242) - by @torabkheslat and @MohammadJavadJamali
| #include <iostream> | |
| #include <vector> | |
| #include <cmath> | |
| #include <cstdlib> | |
| #include <ctime> | |
| #include <random> | |
| using namespace std; | |
| // Activation and Derivative functions |
| #!/bin/bash | |
| # Check if the script is run with superuser privileges | |
| if [ "$EUID" -ne 0 ]; then | |
| echo "Please run this script as root (sudo)." | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| # Prompt the user for the target devices | |
| read -p "Enter the target devices (e.g., /dev/sdX /dev/sdY): " target_devices |
| if (!window.tweets) window.tweets = {}; | |
| /** | |
| * @param tweetElem {HTMLElement} | |
| */ | |
| window.parseTweetElement = (tweetElem) => { | |
| const isQuote = !!Array.from(tweetElem.querySelectorAll("span")).find( | |
| (p) => p.textContent === "Quote" | |
| ); |
List of Accouns is Here contains JSON, CSV and Raw Text.
Accouts gathering using Like Blockers and below links are theirs API.
Changelog:
| """ | |
| Finds all unicode characters that produce at least one character in ASCII range when converted to Uppercase or Lowercase. | |
| Result: | |
| Char ß with code(223) to uppercase contains ASCII char(S). Full uppercase: SS | |
| Char ß with code(223) to uppercase contains ASCII char(S). Full uppercase: SS | |
| Char İ with code(304) to lowercase contains ASCII char(i). Full lowercase: i̇ | |
| Char ı with code(305) to uppercase contains ASCII char(I). Full uppercase: I | |
| Char ʼn with code(329) to uppercase contains ASCII char(N). Full uppercase: ʼN | |
| Char ſ with code(383) to uppercase contains ASCII char(S). Full uppercase: S |
| addEventListener("fetch", (event) => { | |
| event.respondWith(handleRequest(event)); | |
| }); | |
| let data = { | |
| ok: false, | |
| }; | |
| async function handleRequest(event) { | |
| if (event.request.method == "POST") { | |
| let body = await event.request.json(); | |
| if (body.url && body.title && body.telemark_code) { |
| [ | |
| "The program has never collected that information", | |
| "That wasn't in the original specification", | |
| "The project manager told me to do it that way", | |
| "There's currently a problem with our hosting company", | |
| "Well done, you found my easter egg!", | |
| "That feature would be outside of the scope", | |
| "This code was not supposed to go in to production yet", | |
| "The client must have been hacked", | |
| "I'm still working on that as we speak", |
This is inspired by A half-hour to learn Rust and Zig in 30 minutes.
Your first Go program as a classical "Hello World" is pretty simple:
First we create a workspace for our project:
Lecture 1: Introduction to Research — [📝Lecture Notebooks] [
Lecture 2: Introduction to Python — [📝Lecture Notebooks] [
Lecture 3: Introduction to NumPy — [📝Lecture Notebooks] [
Lecture 4: Introduction to pandas — [📝Lecture Notebooks] [
Lecture 5: Plotting Data — [📝Lecture Notebooks] [[
This is definitely not the first time I've written about this topic, but I haven't written formally about it in quite awhile. So I want to revisit why I think technical-position interviewing is so poorly designed, and lay out what I think would be a better process.
I'm just one guy, with a bunch of strong opinions and a bunch of flaws. So take these suggestions with a grain of salt. I'm sure there's a lot of talented, passionate folks with other thoughts, and some are probably a lot more interesting and useful than my own.
But at the same time, I hope you'll set aside the assumptions and status quo of how interviewing is always done. Just because you were hired a certain way, and even if you liked it, doesn't mean that it's a good interview process to repeat.
If you're happy with the way technical interviewing currently works at your company, fine. Just stop, don't read any further. I'm not going to spend any effort trying to convince you otherwise.