Last active
June 20, 2023 23:22
-
-
Save SourceCode/533e00a0589fa9fb7b799c8afd6c99bf to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Binary Gap - Codibility - C#
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
using System; | |
namespace ObjectApp1 | |
{ | |
class Program | |
{ | |
static void Main(string[] args) | |
{ | |
var S = new Solution(); | |
Console.WriteLine(S.solution(0)); | |
} | |
} | |
class Solution | |
{ | |
public int solution(int n) | |
{ | |
string bits = Convert.ToString(n, 2); | |
//Console.WriteLine($"Bit String: {bits}"); | |
int longest = 0; | |
int curCount = 0; | |
for (int i = 0; i < bits.Length; i++) | |
{ | |
if (bits[i] == '0') | |
{ | |
if (curCount > 0) curCount++; | |
else curCount = 1; | |
} else curCount = 0; | |
if (curCount > longest) longest = curCount; | |
} | |
return longest; | |
} | |
} | |
} |
Here is a clear solution. works for all test cases
public int solution(int N)
{
string binaryString = Convert.ToString(N, 2);
int count = 0;
int currentCount = 0;
int strLength = binaryString.Length;
char[] charArray = binaryString.ToCharArray();
//check if there is up to two '1's and if there's any '0'
if (charArray.Count(e => e == '1') < 2 || !charArray.Contains('0'))
{
return 0;
}
for (int i = 0; i < strLength; i++)
{
//check for the first '1' boundary
if (charArray[i] == '1')
{
//start a loop the moment you hit a boundary
for (int j = i+1; j < strLength; j++)
{
if (charArray[j] == '0')
{
//increment as you hit '0' consecutively
currentCount++;
}
else {
//now you hit a '1' a closing boundary. looking good
//now update your count to be the maximum
count = Math.Max(count, currentCount);
//reset currentCount, you may need to start another cycle
currentCount = 0;
//break out of this look to the parent loop
break;
}
}
}
}
return count;
}
Simple solution in JavaScript to return the length of longest binary gap of an integer.
function solution(N) {
let maxBinGapLength = 0;
let newBinGapLength = 0
let count = 0;
let binS = N.toString(2);
console.log(binS);
for (let x = 0; x < binS.length; x++ ) {
if (binS[x] == '1') {
if (count > 0) {
newBinGapLength = count;
count = 0;
}
} else {
count++;
}
maxBinGapLength = Math.max(maxBinGapLength, newBinGapLength);
}
return maxBinGapLength;
}
console.log(solution(9));
--> "1001" --> 2
console.log(solution(20));
--> "10100" --> 1
console.log(solution(32));
--> "100000" --> 0
console.log(solution(529));
--> "1000010001" --> 4
console.log(solution(8743742));
--> "100001010110101100111110" --> 4
Solution in C# console app to return the length of longest binary gap of an integer.
Solution.cs
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace BinaryGap
{
class Solution
{
public int solution(int N)
{
int maxBinGapLength = 0, newBinGapLength = 0, count = 0;
string binStr = Convert.ToString(N, 2);
for (int x= 0; x < binStr.Length; x++)
{
if (binStr[x] == '1')
{
if (count > 0) {
newBinGapLength = count;
count = 0;
}
} else
{
count++;
}
maxBinGapLength = Math.Max(maxBinGapLength, newBinGapLength);
}
Console.WriteLine(binStr);
return maxBinGapLength;
}
}
}
Program.cs
using BinaryGap;
Solution binGap = new Solution();
Console.WriteLine(binGap.solution(20));
Console.WriteLine(binGap.solution(32));
Console.WriteLine(binGap.solution(529));
We can go for the bitwise, by this solution we can avoid the binary conversion,
Works for all test cases
public static int BinaryGapSolutionByBitwise(int N)
{
int maxLength = 0;
int currCount = 0;
bool counting = false;
while (N > 0)
{
if ((N & 1) == 1)
{
counting = true;
maxLength = Math.Max(maxLength, currCount);
currCount = 0;
}
else if (counting)
{
currCount++;
}
N >>= 1;
}
return maxLength;
}
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Here is a solution using a binary mask, twice the efficiency. On 400,000 runs completes in 36 milliseconds compared to 66 for the above string version. Could be optimised further. Moral of the story, strings are slow.