Wondering what the current standings are for the Responsive Images Community Group’s efforts? Look no further.
Bug 870021 Summary: Implement srcset
attribute on img
CLOSED: WONTFIX:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=870021
Bug 870022 Implement picture
element:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=870022
Implement src-n
attribute on img element:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936481
Mozilla does not support srcset
, has requested that it be dropped from the WHATWG spec, and is willing to explore the picture
or src-n
markup patterns.
src-n
was proposed by a Google rep:
http://tabatkins.github.io/specs/respimg/Overview.html
Divided on src-n
in the discussion thread:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-dev/tV3T1wHuXqE/SvWKxIyG6IIJ
Unlikely to move on anything unless WebKit does it first:
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2013-November/041397.html
Client Hints refactor includes src-n
:
https://github.com/igrigorik/http-client-hints/#interaction-with-src-n
Officially silent. Adam Barth is doing the talking on behalf of WebKit on the WHATWG list—and is not a fan of the src-n
pattern—but he officially represents Blink, not WebKit:
See http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2013-November/041397.html, above.
Silent.
“Has anyone thought about using CSS?”
Maciej Stachowiak (WebKit) already shut this idea down for the obvious reasons, but hasn’t officially said anything about src-n
(see: “Apple,” above).
Silent.
HTMLWG is silent because they are all in China for TPAC, I think. Also, the discussion is not really happening there :)