Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@adamralph

adamralph/FluentAssertionsNestedDoubleApproximation.cs

Created May 8, 2014 09:27
Show Gist options
  • Save adamralph/52d13836dedad92994af to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save adamralph/52d13836dedad92994af to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
Example of how to perform nested approximate double comparison in FluentAssertions
Raw
FluentAssertionsNestedDoubleApproximation.cs
var doubleRule = new AssertionRule<double>(
i => i.RuntimeType == typeof(double),
c => Math.Abs(c.Expectation - c.Subject).Should().BeLessThan(0.0000000000001));
actual.ShouldBeEquivalentTo(expected, options => options.Using(doubleRule));
@dennisdoomen
Copy link

Something like this?

var doubleRule = new AssertionRule<double>(
   i => i.RuntimeType == typeof(double),
   c => c.Subject.Should().BeApproxamitelly(c.Expectation, 0.0000000000001));

@adamralph
Copy link
Author

Aha! OK, now I get it. Thanks 😉.

@madstt
Copy link

madstt commented Dec 19, 2014

I'm looking for customizing assertions when comparing lists. The following is using SemanticComparison to compare two objects from two lists:

                entities[0].AsSource().OfLikeness<SomeObject>()
                .OmitAutoComparison()
                .WithDefaultEquality(x => x.SomeProperty1)
                .WithDefaultEquality(x => x.SomeProperty2)
                .ShouldEqual(result[0]);

I'd like FluentAssertions to compare the two lists with some specified options like above.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment