Created
September 22, 2010 13:14
-
-
Save aeden/591634 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| ruby-1.8.7-p249 > Geokit::Bounds.from_point_and_radius([53.91848,-122.776584], 4993) | |
| => #<Geokit::Bounds:0x1050e7580 @ne=#<Geokit::LatLng:0x1050e8e08 @lat=53.897792470202, @lng=-43.4942376451051>, @sw=#<Geokit::LatLng:0x1050e8e58 @lat=-18.265247529798, @lng=-202.058930354895>> | |
| ruby-1.8.7-p249 > Geokit::Bounds.from_point_and_radius([53.91848,-122.776584], 4997) | |
| => #<Geokit::Bounds:0x1050dee08 @ne=#<Geokit::LatLng:0x1050e0690 @lat=53.8399645290606, @lng=-43.4579700787395>, @sw=#<Geokit::LatLng:0x1050e06e0 @lat=-18.3230754709394, @lng=-202.09519792126>> |
Generalized spherical geometry for navigation has a singularity at each pole. Things get really wonky near the arctic circles, too. 54deg North is pretty "up there" I'd try shrinking your radius to 10km and then increase it again until you see things break.
Also, it depends on which algorithm GeoKit is using. There's a simplified formula which doesn't account for sign changes; it works fine for small ranges and is much faster; it just won't cross poles or the international dateline. In addition, like I said, these formulae start to break down as you get near the poles -- somewhere sine(theta) is approaching 0.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Yep, I'm sure that's the problem.
As I pointed out the diameter either of those circles should be around 90 degrees in latitude, at 40 degrees north each degree of latitude is only 85 km, and at 54 north even less, so the diameter in longitude is greater than 120 degrees