Created
August 21, 2023 16:01
-
-
Save agoose77/01a22f4c2a3e33c424815ab68ffa2731 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
16:01:28 From Kilian Lieret To Everyone: | |
https://indico.cern.ch/event/1317785/ | |
16:02:20 From Kilian Lieret To Everyone: | |
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YfELjDItYuT10g_FNgAU7emrpVkmjVapkJpgg4oRtE0/edit?usp=sharing | |
16:10:08 From Wouter Deconinck (he/him) To Everyone: | |
Would snippets be maintained somehow? A builtin test with CI? | |
16:10:26 From Angus Hollands (he/him) To Everyone: | |
^ I think that should/could extend to all columns | |
16:11:25 From Wouter Deconinck (he/him) To Everyone: | |
True, but snippets sound more ephemeral... | |
16:11:30 From Jim Pivarski To Everyone: | |
Let's discuss this verbally. | |
16:33:06 From Clemens Lange To Everyone: | |
Really sorry, but need to leave already. I'll have a look at the notes tomorrow. | |
16:33:14 From Kilian Lieret To Everyone: | |
Thanks for joining Celemens! | |
16:37:09 From Wouter Deconinck (he/him) To Everyone: | |
I don't see gists under my organizations, just organization-wide discussions | |
16:39:15 From Angus Hollands (he/him) To Everyone: | |
I see it's possible to author them for an org I think | |
16:39:16 From Angus Hollands (he/him) To Everyone: | |
https://gist.github.com/scikit-hep | |
16:40:39 From Kilian Lieret To Everyone: | |
But can you actually create one there? | |
16:42:16 From Angus Hollands (he/him) To Everyone: | |
I suspect I don't have the permis | |
16:52:37 From Wouter Deconinck (he/him) To Everyone: | |
How is a repository with markdown and attached files different from https://github.com/orgs/scikit-hep/discussions/new?category=show-and-tell ? | |
16:53:04 From Angus Hollands (he/him) To Everyone: | |
Moderation, I think - I don't believe you can do so for discussions | |
16:55:09 From Jim Pivarski To Everyone: | |
Centralized Discussions could be a good way to do it. They're markdown-only, not .py or .ipynb... | |
16:56:14 From Wouter Deconinck (he/him) To Everyone: | |
Drawbacks I could find: | |
- moderation is public until removed by organization moderator | |
- no way to pull into an external database without web scraping | |
16:56:44 From Angus Hollands (he/him) To Everyone: | |
^ Agreed, #2 is problematic | |
16:57:13 From Jim Pivarski To Everyone: | |
That's true: you can't make a database of Discussions. | |
16:57:37 From Jim Pivarski To Everyone: | |
(Unless maybe with GitHub API?) | |
16:58:42 From Angus Hollands (he/him) To Everyone: | |
Hard to use CI to validate contributions e.g. to ensure valid metadata? | |
16:59:09 From Wouter Deconinck (he/him) To Everyone: | |
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/teams/discussions?apiVersion=2022-11-28#get-a-discussion | |
17:00:25 From Wouter Deconinck (he/him) To Everyone: | |
chat saved |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment