flowchart TD
A[Kubernetes Cluster] --> B[Metrics Collection]
A --> C[Log Collection]
%% Metrics Branch
B --> D[Prometheus]
B --> Z[VictoriaMetrics Stack]
D --> E[Grafana]
D --> F[Alertmanager]
D --> G[Mimir]
Z --> ZA[VictoriaMetrics]
Z --> ZB[VMAlert]
Z --> ZC[VMUI]
Z --> ZD[Grafana]
%% Log Branch
C --> H[EFK Stack]
C --> I[Loki]
C --> J[Fluent Bit / Promtail / Vector]
%% EFK Details
H --> K[Fluentd]
H --> L[Elasticsearch]
H --> M[Kibana]
%% Loki Details
I --> N[Promtail]
I --> O[Loki]
I --> P[Grafana]
%% Lightweight Alternatives
J --> Q[File/S3 Storage]
J --> R[Loki]
J --> S[External/Cloud Solutions]
%% Monitoring vs Logging
B -.-> T[Use for Performance, Health, Alerts]
C -.-> U[Use for Troubleshooting, Auditing, Compliance]
%% User Actions
E --> V[Query Metrics]
F --> W[Get Alerts]
M --> X[Query Logs]
P --> Y[Query Logs]
ZD --> V
ZB --> W
ZC --> V
ZA --> ZC
ZA --> ZB
Last active
August 12, 2025 04:19
-
-
Save akhan4u/14d72f7900969ce1832d621c09fe261b to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
kubernetes logging
VictoriaMetrics is primarily designed for metrics storage, not for log aggregation or storage.
Details:
- VictoriaMetrics is a high-performance, scalable time-series database for storing, retrieving, and managing metrics (such as those exported by Prometheus, Graphite, etc.).
- It does not natively support log storage or log querying like Elasticsearch or Grafana Loki.
- You can use VictoriaMetrics to store log-based metrics (e.g., counts of errors, request rates extracted from logs), but not the actual log messages or lines themselves.
For log aggregation in Kubernetes:
- Use Grafana Loki, Elasticsearch, or similar log-specific solutions.
Summary Table:
| Solution | Metrics Storage | Log Storage | Log Search |
|---|---|---|---|
| VictoriaMetrics | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Grafana Loki | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Elasticsearch | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
Conclusion:
VictoriaMetrics cannot be used for logging. Use it for metrics; use Loki/Elasticsearch for logs.
Mimir is for metrics storage, not log storage.
- Grafana Mimir is an open-source, horizontally scalable, long-term storage for Prometheus metrics.
- It is designed to store, query, and manage time-series metric data (such as CPU, memory, HTTP requests, etc.), not logs.
- For log storage, you should use Grafana Loki (which is Grafana’s solution for log aggregation and storage).
Summary:
- Mimir → Metrics (Prometheus)
- Loki → Logs
A popular lightweight alternative to Elasticsearch for log aggregation and storage in Kubernetes is Grafana Loki.
Why Loki?
- Designed for Kubernetes: Loki integrates natively with Kubernetes and Prometheus.
- Lightweight: Consumes far fewer resources than Elasticsearch.
- Scalable: Easy to run in single-node or multi-node clusters.
- Simple Indexing: Indexes only metadata, not log content, resulting in lower storage and better performance for typical log aggregation use cases.
- Visualization: Integrates seamlessly with Grafana for querying and dashboarding.
Typical Stack
- Loki: Log storage and aggregation.
- Promtail (or Fluent Bit): Log collection and forwarding from Kubernetes nodes/pods.
- Grafana: Visualization and querying.
Other Lightweight Alternatives
- Fluent Bit + local filesystem/S3: Collect logs and store them in files or cloud object storage. Good for simple setups.
- Vector: Log collection, transformation, and forwarding. Can be used to send logs to cloud storage, Loki, or other destinations.
- LogDNA, Papertrail, or similar SaaS solutions: If you want managed log aggregation.
Summary Table
| Solution | Resource Usage | Query Features | Visualization | Kubernetes Integration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loki | Low | Good | Grafana | Excellent |
| Fluent Bit | Low | None (raw logs) | External (S3, file) | Good |
| Vector | Low | None | External | Good |
| Elasticsearch | High | Excellent | Kibana | Good |
Recommendation:
For most Kubernetes log aggregation needs, especially in small or single-node K3s clusters, Loki is the best lightweight alternative to Elasticsearch.
Prometheus stack and EFK stack serve different purposes when it comes to Kubernetes logging and monitoring:
Prometheus Stack
- Components: Prometheus (metrics collection), Alertmanager (alerts), Grafana (visualization).
- Main Focus: Metrics (CPU, memory, latency, request counts, error rates, etc.).
- Logging Support: Prometheus itself does not collect or store logs. It can scrape log-based metrics (e.g., via exporters or Loki), but it’s not a log aggregation solution.
- Use Case: Monitoring cluster and application health, performance, and alerting.
EFK Stack (Elasticsearch, Fluentd, Kibana)
- Components: Fluentd (log collector/forwarder), Elasticsearch (log indexing/storage), Kibana (log visualization/search).
- Main Focus: Log collection, aggregation, storage, and querying.
- Logging Support: Purpose-built for collecting application, system, and cluster logs.
- Use Case: Centralized log management, troubleshooting, search, compliance.
Summary Table
| Stack | Main Purpose | Logging Support | Metric Support | Visualization |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prometheus | Metrics/Monitoring | ❌ (not for logs) | ✅ | Grafana |
| EFK | Log Aggregation/Search | ✅ | ❌ (not for metrics) | Kibana |
Which is More Suitable for Log Collection?
- EFK stack is more suitable for log collection in a Kubernetes (including K3s) environment.
- If you want centralized, searchable logs, use EFK (or its alternatives: ELK, Loki, etc.).
- Prometheus stack is for metrics—not logs.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
For a single-node K3s cluster, the most efficient logging stack should be:
Recommended Stack: Grafana Loki + Promtail/Fluent Bit
Why?
Alternatives
Summary Table
Conclusion:
Grafana Loki + Promtail/Fluent Bit is the most efficient and practical logging stack for a single-node K3s cluster.