alecmev

Keybase proof

I hereby claim:

• I am jeremejevs on github.
• I am jeremejevs (https://keybase.io/jeremejevs) on keybase.
• I have a public key ASBqIFLb21nzT2U_pgBx8_otqlxOCug8Pzrwwp2Qx-EItQo

To claim this, I am signing this object:

alecmev

vars.preset normal false
vars.serverType private

admin.password <password>
vars.gamePassword fnbf
vars.serverDescription "Want to join? You most certainly can! Find out more on https://fnbf.club/"
vars.serverMessage "Friday Night Battlefield"
vars.serverName "Friday Night Battlefield"

fairFight.activate

alecmev

// ==UserScript==
// @name         StayRegexd
// @version      1.0
// @namespace    http://jeremejevs.com/
// @author       Olegs Jeremejevs
// @include      /^https?:\/\/(www\.)?reddit\.com(?!\/(r\/[^\/]+\/comments\/[^\/]+|user))/
// @include      /^https?:\/\/news\.ycombinator\.com(?!\/(item|user))/
// @include      /^https?:\/\/(www\.)?youtube\.com(\/(feed|\?|$)|$)/
// @grant        none
// ==/UserScript==

alecmev

l_loc = {
    "xp0": "Second Assault",
    "xp1": "China Rising",
    "xp2": "Naval Strike",
    "xp3": "Dragon's Teeth",
    "xp4": "Final Stand"
};

alecmev

This makes no sense. Multiple people have proposed to prohibit vehicle stealing altogether, including myself, and the only rationale I heard for NOT doing so was "this will be impossible to police". I'm sorry, how exactly is that more impossible to police than, say, active radar usage? You do not get it in the kill feed and you can't see it being done from the spectator's point of view, unless you're looking for it after a report. Also, I can say with 100% confidence, that during all my time in organized 32v32's I haven't seen a boat being stolen during combat. Maybe somebody else did, but you gotta agree, that the odds of that happening are probably 1-2 times per year. And that only matters if it was wrongfully reported as a base stolen asset, which is even more unlikely. What I'm saying is that if somebody is reporting a stolen asset from the base, and the enemy is seen using it, then there's a very good chance that they're telling the truth.

Now, why should it be prohibited completely? Because this is, pa

alecmev

Why can't an announcement be discussed? Because "somebody said so"? Getting so tired of this bureaucratic bullshit. Provide a thread where this can be discussed then, and link it from here. Also, why is everybody so trigger happy when it comes to removing original content? Good thing I've predicted this irrational crap, and backed it up; in places, where you want people to come back, you take users' stuff and move it elsewhere (i.e. into a new thread in Mess Hall), if it was misplaced, instead of permanently erasing it.

alecmev

15.01.12 ACX vs. CTG

• Jihad + lol
• Some sneaky special forces s***
• Yet another jihad
• Fast-paced action-packed
• OMG
• Alpha
• F*** that

alecmev

// ==UserScript==
// @name         Show Python 3 documentation by default
// @namespace    http://jeremejevs.com/
// @author       Olegs Jeremejevs
// @description  Automatically redirects Python 2 docs to Python 3.
// @match        *://docs.python.org/2*
// @version      1.0
// ==/UserScript==

var tmp = document.location.pathname.split('/');

alecmev

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\.001]
@="7-Zip.001"

[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\7-Zip.001]
@="001 Archive"

[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\7-Zip.001\DefaultIcon]
@="C:\\Program Files\\7-Zip\\7z.dll,9"

alecmev

def align(source, chars, mode):

    source = list(source)

    if len(source) == 0:
        return ''

    result = ''
    lineBuffer = [source[0]]
    lineLength = len(source[0])