Look at LSB init scripts for more information.
Copy to /etc/init.d
:
# replace "$YOUR_SERVICE_NAME" with your service's name (whenever it's not enough obvious)
import com.google.gson.GsonBuilder | |
import kotlin.reflect.KMutableProperty | |
import kotlin.reflect.full.memberProperties | |
//Enum and properties to better infix semantic | |
private const val Terminal = 0 | |
enum class LogTarget(val value: Int) { | |
TERMINAL(0); |
import java.time.LocalDate | |
//Domain entity, command an result from CQRS | |
data class Person(val id: Int, val name: String, val createdAt: LocalDate, val updateAt: LocalDate) | |
data class PersonCommand(val name: String) | |
data class PersonResult(val id: Int, val name: String) | |
//Repository, Logger and Mapper abstractions | |
interface Repository<T> { fun insert(entity: T) : T } |
package com.healthifyme.dftrial; | |
import com.google.api.services.bigquery.model.TableRow; | |
import com.google.api.services.bigquery.model.TableSchema; | |
import com.google.api.services.bigquery.model.TableFieldSchema; | |
import com.healthifyme.dftrial.common.ExampleUtils; | |
import java.util.ArrayList; | |
import java.util.List; | |
import java.util.HashMap; |
package join | |
import ( | |
"fmt" | |
"strings" | |
"testing" | |
) | |
var ( | |
testData = []string{"a", "b", "c", "d", "e"} |
package main | |
// http://play.golang.org/p/fVf7duRtdH | |
import "fmt" | |
import "unicode/utf16" | |
import "unicode/utf8" | |
import "bytes" | |
func main() { |
Look at LSB init scripts for more information.
Copy to /etc/init.d
:
# replace "$YOUR_SERVICE_NAME" with your service's name (whenever it's not enough obvious)
I was at Amazon for about six and a half years, and now I've been at Google for that long. One thing that struck me immediately about the two companies -- an impression that has been reinforced almost daily -- is that Amazon does everything wrong, and Google does everything right. Sure, it's a sweeping generalization, but a surprisingly accurate one. It's pretty crazy. There are probably a hundred or even two hundred different ways you can compare the two companies, and Google is superior in all but three of them, if I recall correctly. I actually did a spreadsheet at one point but Legal wouldn't let me show it to anyone, even though recruiting loved it.
I mean, just to give you a very brief taste: Amazon's recruiting process is fundamentally flawed by having teams hire for themselves, so their hiring bar is incredibly inconsistent across teams, despite various efforts they've made to level it out. And their operations are a mess; they don't real
# _______ _ _ _ _ _ | |
# |__ __| | (_) (_) | | | | | |
# | | | |__ _ ___ ___ ___ _ __ _ _ __ | |_ _ __ ___ _____ _____ __| | | |
# | | | '_ \| / __| / __|/ __| '__| | '_ \| __| | '_ ` _ \ / _ \ \ / / _ \/ _` | | |
# | | | | | | \__ \ \__ \ (__| | | | |_) | |_ | | | | | | (_) \ V / __/ (_| | | |
# |_| |_| |_|_|___/ |___/\___|_| |_| .__/ \__| |_| |_| |_|\___/ \_/ \___|\__,_| | |
# | | | |
# |_| | |
# | |
# New home : https://github.com/bric3/osx-jdk5-installer |