Really weird interpreter issue going on with ruby 1.9.3 and rspec 1.3.2. In the first spec, the call to `expect({}).to()` is not receiving the `raise_error()` as an argument since it's on a second line, and I don't know what it's taking for an argument. If we move the `to` directive down to the `raise_error` line as in spec#2, it works!

quirky_interpreter_spec.rb

describe 'Smelly RSpec 1.3.2' do
	it "should fail, but doesn't" do
	  # this will pass, even though it should fail
  	expect { raise ArgumentError, 'bar' }.to
	    raise_error(ArgumentError, /foo/i)
	end

	it "should fail, and it does" do
	  # and this would work -.-'
	  expect { raise ArgumentError, 'bar' }.
  	  to raise_error(ArgumentError, /foo/i)
	end
end