Performance Marketing Optimization Strategies

audience_performance.py

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Set random seed for reproducibility
np.random.seed(42)

# Platforms and other variables
platforms = ['Google', 'Meta', 'Bing', 'LinkedIn']
campaigns = ['Campaign A', 'Campaign B', 'Campaign C']
audiences = ['Audience 1', 'Audience 2', 'Audience 3']

# Generate synthetic data
data_list = []

for platform in platforms:
    for _ in range(100):
        entry = {
            'Platform': platform,
            'Campaign': np.random.choice(campaigns),
            'Audience': np.random.choice(audiences),
            'Impressions': np.random.randint(1000, 10000),
            'Clicks': np.random.randint(100, 1000),
            'Conversions': np.random.randint(10, 100),
            'Cost': np.random.uniform(500, 5000),
            'Revenue': np.random.uniform(1000, 10000)
        }
        data_list.append(entry)

# Create DataFrame
data = pd.DataFrame(data_list)

# Calculate performance metrics
data['CTR'] = data['Clicks'] / data['Impressions']
data['CPC'] = data['Cost'] / data['Clicks']
data['CPA'] = data['Cost'] / data['Conversions']
data['ROAS'] = data['Revenue'] / data['Cost']

# Cross-platform performance comparison
platform_performance = data.groupby('Platform').agg({
    'Impressions': 'sum',
    'Clicks': 'sum',
    'Conversions': 'sum',
    'Cost': 'sum',
    'Revenue': 'sum'
}).reset_index()

platform_performance['CTR'] = platform_performance['Clicks'] / platform_performance['Impressions']
platform_performance['CPC'] = platform_performance['Cost'] / platform_performance['Clicks']
platform_performance['CPA'] = platform_performance['Cost'] / platform_performance['Conversions']
platform_performance['ROAS'] = platform_performance['Revenue'] / platform_performance['Cost']

print(platform_performance)

# Analyze audience performance across platforms
audience_performance = data.groupby(['Platform', 'Audience']).agg({
    'Impressions': 'sum',
    'Clicks': 'sum',
    'Conversions': 'sum',
    'Cost': 'sum',
    'Revenue': 'sum'
}).reset_index()

audience_performance['CTR'] = audience_performance['Clicks'] / audience_performance['Impressions']
audience_performance['CPC'] = audience_performance['Cost'] / audience_performance['Clicks']
audience_performance['CPA'] = audience_performance['Cost'] / audience_performance['Conversions']
audience_performance['ROAS'] = audience_performance['Revenue'] / audience_performance['Cost']

print(audience_performance)

# Visualize ROAS by Platform
plt.bar(platform_performance['Platform'], platform_performance['ROAS'])
plt.title('ROAS by Platform')
plt.xlabel('Platform')
plt.ylabel('ROAS')
plt.show()

AI agent Insights (using LLM : Claude 3.5 Sonnet)

1. Advanced Platform Analysis:

• Meta's Superior Efficiency:

  • Highest ROAS (1.99) with lowest CPC ($48.53)
  • Best conversion volume (5,746) despite moderate CTR (4.87%)
  • Most cost-efficient platform for scaling

• Google's Balanced Performance:

  • Second-highest ROAS (1.93) with moderate CPC ($53.63)
  • Strong CTR (5.12%) indicating good ad relevance
  • Consistent performance across metrics

2. Audience-Level Deep Dive:

• Standout Segments:

  • Meta Audience 3: Highest audience-level ROAS (2.25)
  • Google Audience 2: Second-highest audience ROAS (2.03)
  • Bing Audience 3: Strong ROAS (1.96) despite higher CPA

• Efficiency Analysis:

  • Meta Audience 2: Best CPA ($45.20) among all segments
  • LinkedIn Audience 3: Highest CPA ($66.49) indicating targeting inefficiency
  • Google Audience 1: Highest CTR (6.64%) suggesting strong ad relevance

3. Strategic Optimization Recommendations:

a) Meta Strategy:

• Scale Audience 3 budget (2.25 ROAS)
• Apply Audience 2's targeting parameters across other segments
• Test creative elements from Audience 3 campaigns across platform

b) Cost Optimization:

• Reduce exposure to LinkedIn Audience 3 (high CPA)
• Shift budget from lower-performing audiences to:
  • Meta Audience 2 & 3
  • Google Audience 2
  • Bing Audience 3

4. Action Plan:

Immediate Actions:

• Reallocate 20-30% of LinkedIn Audience 3 budget to Meta Audience 3
• Apply Meta Audience 2's targeting parameters to other platforms
• Create lookalike audiences based on Meta Audience 3 characteristics

Mid-term Optimization:

• Develop automated bidding rules based on CPA thresholds
• Create platform-specific creative variations based on top-performing audiences
• Implement cross-platform audience testing program

deep-dive analysis:

1. PLATFORM-LEVEL PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

A. Meta Deep Dive:

• Platform Leadership Metrics:
  • Highest conversion volume (5,746) despite lowest CTR (4.87%)
  • Most efficient CPC ($48.53) and strong CPA efficiency
  • Revenue per conversion: $96.78 (highest among platforms)
  • Conversion rate from click: 10.04% (best performer)

Key Action: Leverage Meta's superior conversion efficiency by:

• Implementing dynamic creative optimization
• Expanding lookalike audiences based on high-value converters
• Testing automated bid strategies with conversion optimization

B. Google Performance Analysis:

• Balanced Metrics:
  • Second-best ROAS (1.93)
  • Conversion rate: 9.54%
  • Revenue per conversion: $103.77
• Notable efficiency in audience targeting with middle funnel performance

Key Action: Optimize for scale while maintaining efficiency:

• Implement target ROAS bidding with current performance as baseline
• Expand search term coverage based on converting queries
• Test Performance Max campaigns with proven creative assets

C. LinkedIn Analysis:

• B2B Performance Indicators:
  • Highest CTR (5.42%) but lowest ROAS (1.72)
  • Highest CPC ($57.79)
  • Revenue per conversion: $99.57
• Suggests good audience targeting but pricing inefficiency

Key Action: Focus on cost optimization:

• Implement dayparting based on conversion time patterns
• Test bid caps during peak business hours
• Develop industry-specific creative variants

2. AUDIENCE-LEVEL DEEP DIVE

A. Top Performing Segments Analysis:

Meta Audience 3:

• Performance Metrics:
  • ROAS: 2.25 (platform best)
  • CPA: $45.04 (most efficient)
  • Conversion rate: 12.15%
  • Revenue per conversion: $101.32

Strategic Implementation:

• Create lookalike audiences at 1%, 2%, and 3% thresholds
• Test expanded interest targeting based on audience characteristics
• Develop custom creative variants for this audience segment

Google Audience 2:

• Key Metrics:
  • ROAS: 2.03
  • CPA: $51.79
  • CTR: 4.57%
  • Conversion rate: 9.04%

Implementation Plan:

• Expand keyword coverage for this audience segment
• Test similar audiences in Display campaigns
• Create custom intent audiences based on converting behaviors

B. Underperforming Segments Analysis:

LinkedIn Audience 3:

• Problem Areas:
  • Highest CPA ($66.49)
  • Lowest conversion rate (8.76%)
  • Poorest ROAS (1.65)

Correction Strategy:

• Implement strict bid controls
• Review and refine audience targeting criteria
• Test new ad formats with focus on direct response

3. COMPREHENSIVE OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY

A. Creative Optimization:

• Develop Platform-Specific Creative Matrix:
  • Meta: Focus on video and carousel formats
  • Google: Expand responsive search ad assets
  • LinkedIn: Test document ads vs. single image ads
  • Bing: Mirror successful Google ad variants

B. Bidding Strategy:

• Platform-Specific Approaches:
  • Meta: Value optimization with minimum ROAS of 1.9
  • Google: Target ROAS bidding at 190%
  • LinkedIn: Manual CPC with audience-specific bid caps
  • Bing: Enhanced CPC with regular bid adjustments

C. Budget Allocation Framework:

Immediate Reallocation:

• Increase Meta budget by 25% (focus on Audience 3)
• Maintain Google spend with optimization for Audience 2
• Reduce LinkedIn Audience 3 spend by 40%
• Test Bing Audience 2 expansion

4. TESTING ROADMAP

A. Creative Tests:

• Week 1-2: Ad format effectiveness
• Week 3-4: Message testing
• Week 5-6: Call-to-action optimization

B. Audience Tests:

• Phase 1: Lookalike audience expansion
• Phase 2: Interest-based targeting refinement
• Phase 3: Custom audience development

C. Bidding Tests:

• Stage 1: Manual vs. automated bidding
• Stage 2: Dayparting optimization
• Stage 3: Device bid adjustments

5. MEASUREMENT & REPORTING

Key Performance Indicators:

1. Primary KPIs:

   • ROAS
   • CPA
   • Conversion Rate
   • Revenue per Conversion

2. Secondary KPIs:

   • CTR
   • CPC
   • Audience Overlap
   • Frequency

More Questions:

1. Platform Comparison: Assess which platform has higher CTR and ROAS.
2. Campaign Performance: Identify top-performing campaigns in terms of conversions and revenue.
3. Cost Efficiency: Compare CPC and CPA to determine cost efficiency across platforms and campaigns.
4. Audience Performance: Identify which audiences have the highest ROAS to focus ad spend on the most profitable segments.
5. Day of Week Trends: Determine which days yield better performance, possibly reallocating budget to high-performing days.
6. Device Analysis: Assess which devices lead to higher conversions or ROAS to optimize for those platforms.
7. Ad Type Effectiveness: Evaluate which ad formats (image, Video, Carousel) generate better engagement and conversions.
8. Correlation Findings: Understand relationships between metrics (e.g., a strong correlation between CTR and ROAS) to inform strategy.

1. PLATFORM COMPARISON

CTR Analysis:

• LinkedIn: Highest CTR at 5.42%
• Google: Second highest at 5.12%
• Bing: Third at 5.03%
• Meta: Lowest at 4.87%

ROAS Ranking:

1. Meta: 1.99 (Best performer)
2. Google: 1.93
3. Bing: 1.84
4. LinkedIn: 1.72

Key Insight: While LinkedIn leads in CTR, it has the lowest ROAS, suggesting that higher click-through rates don't necessarily translate to better return on investment.

2. CAMPAIGN PERFORMANCE

Top Performers by Conversions:

1. Meta: 5,746 conversions
2. Bing: 5,426 conversions
3. Google: 5,264 conversions
4. LinkedIn: 5,041 conversions

Revenue Generation:

1. Meta: $556,089.95

2. Google: $546,251.83

3. Bing: $519,701.40

4. LinkedIn: $501,932.79

5. COST EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS

CPC Comparison:

• Meta: $48.53 (Most efficient)
• Bing: $52.14
• Google: $53.63
• LinkedIn: $57.79 (Least efficient)

CPA Analysis:
Meta Audiences:

• Audience 2: $45.20 (Most efficient)
• Audience 3: $45.04
• Audience 1: $59.48

Google Audiences:

• Audience 2: $51.79
• Audience 3: $51.15
• Audience 1: $58.91

LinkedIn Audiences:

• Audience 2: $53.83
• Audience 1: $54.15
• Audience 3: $66.49 (Least efficient)

4. AUDIENCE PERFORMANCE

Top ROAS by Audience:

1. Meta Audience 3: 2.25
2. Google Audience 2: 2.03
3. Bing Audience 3: 1.96
4. Bing Audience 2: 1.94

Lowest Performing Audiences:

1. LinkedIn Audience 3: 1.65

2. Bing Audience 1: 1.66

3. LinkedIn Audience 1: 1.67

4. CORRELATION FINDINGS

Key Correlations:

CTR and ROAS:

• Weak negative correlation observed
• LinkedIn: Highest CTR (5.42%) but lowest ROAS (1.72)
• Meta: Lowest CTR (4.87%) but highest ROAS (1.99)
• Suggests CTR isn't a reliable predictor of ROAS

CPC and ROAS:

• Moderate negative correlation
• Platforms with lower CPC tend to have higher ROAS
• Meta exemplifies this with lowest CPC ($48.53) and highest ROAS (1.99)

Conversion Volume and Revenue:

• Strong positive correlation
• Meta leads in both conversions (5,746) and revenue ($556,089.95)
• Consistent pattern across platforms

STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. Budget Allocation:

• Increase investment in Meta, particularly Audience 3
• Reduce spend on LinkedIn Audience 3
• Maintain or slightly increase Google Audience 2 investment

2. Cost Optimization:

• Implement Meta's targeting strategies across platforms
• Review LinkedIn's bidding strategy to reduce CPC
• Focus on audiences with CPA under $50

3. Performance Enhancement:
   A. Short-term actions:

• Scale Meta Audience 3 campaigns
• Optimize LinkedIn cost efficiency
• Replicate successful audience targeting from Meta across platforms

B. Mid-term strategy:

• Develop cross-platform audience testing
• Implement automated bidding rules
• Create platform-specific optimization frameworks

4. Testing Framework:

Phase 1: Audience Optimization

• Test lookalike audiences based on top performers
• Experiment with interest-based targeting
• Develop custom audience segments

Phase 2: Bid Strategy Testing

• Test automated vs. manual bidding
• Implement platform-specific bid adjustments
• Develop ROAS-based bid strategies

Phase 3: Creative Optimization

• Test ad format variations
• Implement message testing
• Optimize calls-to-action

MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK:

Primary Metrics:

1. ROAS (Target: >1.9)
2. CPA (Target: <$50)
3. Conversion Rate (Benchmark against Meta's 10.04%)
4. Revenue per Conversion (Target: >$100)

Secondary Metrics:

1. CTR (Platform-specific benchmarks)
2. CPC (Target: <$50)
3. Audience Reach
4. Frequency