Complete technical documentation of Claude Code's internal tools
This document provides comprehensive technical details about Claude Code's internal tools, including parameter schemas, implementation behaviors, and usage patterns.
Technical Details:
Complete technical documentation of Claude Code's internal tools
This document provides comprehensive technical details about Claude Code's internal tools, including parameter schemas, implementation behaviors, and usage patterns.
Technical Details:
Complete technical documentation of Claude Code's internal tools
This document provides comprehensive technical details about Claude Code's internal tools, including parameter schemas, implementation behaviors, and usage patterns.
Technical Details:
| Language | Primary Registry / Manager | Popularity Reason |
|---|---|---|
| C | ❌ No official registry; OS package managers (apt, brew) |
Systems programming, legacy software, embedded devices |
| C++ | vcpkg, Conan, CPM | High-performance apps, game engines, system-level programming |
| C# | NuGet | .NET ecosystem, enterprise apps, game dev (Unity) |
| Clojure | Clojars | Functional programming on JVM, enterprise & web apps |
| Crystal | Shards | Ruby-like syntax, fast native c |
Achieving synchronization across multiple RAFT groups, especially for operations that span different partitions and require atomicity, is a complex but critical aspect of building scalable, consistent distributed systems. Below, we revisit the challenges and strategies for atomic operations across RAFT groups.
In a multi-RAFT architecture, each RAFT group independently manages a subset of data. While this design enhances scalability and fault tolerance, it complicates operations that must be performed atomically across multiple partitions.
In modern operating systems, networking is not limited to physical Ethernet interfaces (eth0, en0, etc.). There are a variety of virtual networking abstractions and constructs—like tun, tap, bridge, veth, subnet—that enable everything from virtual machines and containers to VPNs and complex local network simulations.
This document will break down how these components work, why they exist, and how they fit together. Examples will focus on Linux and macOS, with key differences noted.
How monocore structurs files, configs it stores:
graph TD
A[~/.monocore] --> B[monoimage/]
B --> C[repo/]
C --> D["[repo-name]__[tag].cid"]
B --> E[layer/]| use crate::compiler::reversible::Reversible; | |
| //-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
| // Types | |
| //-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
| /// The result of a combinator expression. | |
| #[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)] | |
| pub enum Combinator<T> { | |
| /// A single `T` value. |
| [package] | |
| name = "itertest" | |
| version = "0.1.0" | |
| edition = "2021" | |
| [dependencies] | |
| futures = "0.3.28" | |
| pyo3 = "0.19.2" | |
| pyo3-asyncio = { version = "0.19.0", features = ["tokio-runtime"] } | |
| tokio = { version = "1.32.0", features = ["sync"] } |