Language | Primary Registry / Manager | Popularity Reason |
---|---|---|
C | ❌ No official registry; OS package managers (apt , brew ) |
Systems programming, legacy software, embedded devices |
C++ | vcpkg, Conan, CPM | High-performance apps, game engines, system-level programming |
C# | NuGet | .NET ecosystem, enterprise apps, game dev (Unity) |
Clojure | Clojars | Functional programming on JVM, enterprise & web apps |
Crystal | Shards | Ruby-like syntax, fast native c |
Achieving synchronization across multiple RAFT
groups, especially for operations that span different partitions and require atomicity, is a complex but critical aspect of building scalable, consistent distributed systems. Below, we revisit the challenges and strategies for atomic operations across RAFT
groups.
In a multi-RAFT
architecture, each RAFT
group independently manages a subset of data. While this design enhances scalability and fault tolerance, it complicates operations that must be performed atomically across multiple partitions.
In modern operating systems, networking is not limited to physical Ethernet interfaces (eth0
, en0
, etc.). There are a variety of virtual networking abstractions and constructs—like tun
, tap
, bridge
, veth
, subnet
—that enable everything from virtual machines and containers to VPNs and complex local network simulations.
This document will break down how these components work, why they exist, and how they fit together. Examples will focus on Linux and macOS, with key differences noted.
How monocore structurs files, configs it stores:
graph TD
A[~/.monocore] --> B[monoimage/]
B --> C[repo/]
C --> D["[repo-name]__[tag].cid"]
B --> E[layer/]
use crate::compiler::reversible::Reversible; | |
//-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
// Types | |
//-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
/// The result of a combinator expression. | |
#[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)] | |
pub enum Combinator<T> { | |
/// A single `T` value. |
[package] | |
name = "itertest" | |
version = "0.1.0" | |
edition = "2021" | |
[dependencies] | |
futures = "0.3.28" | |
pyo3 = "0.19.2" | |
pyo3-asyncio = { version = "0.19.0", features = ["tokio-runtime"] } | |
tokio = { version = "1.32.0", features = ["sync"] } |
When you have a Flex widget, where the child with the maximum cross-axis size determines the cross-axis size of the rest.
If you try to use CrossAxisAlignment.stretch
with a Flex whose parent is unbounded along the cross-axis, you will get an error.
To solve this, you should use Intrinsic*
widgets. They do speculative pass on the Flex widget tree to determine the max size along the cross-axis and that becomes the constraint they pass to the Flex.
graph TD;
A-->B;
A-->C;
B-->D;
C-->D;
I'm trying t skip some fields with rkyv but I have managed to get it working yet. Frankly I don't want to think too much about it right now so I will be temporarily using bincode. I still believe in rkyv but it may not be ready yet for my use-case. I will keep it in my backlog to reimplement ser-de in rkyv.
use bytecheck::CheckBytes;
use llvm_sys::{
target::{LLVM_InitializeNativeAsmPrinter, LLVM_InitializeNativeTarget},
LLVMModule,
};