Dynamically update attribute of a Chef resource during converge phase (Node variable assignment in Compile vs Converge)

chef_attribute_converge.rb

# In Chef, when a resource is defined all its variables are evaluated during
# compile time and the execution of the resource takes place in converge phase.
# So if the value of a particular attribute is changed in converge
# (and not in compile) the resource will be executed with the old value.

# Example problem:
# Let's consider this situation where there are two steps involved in a recipe
# Step 1 is a Ruby block that changes a node attribute. Rubyblocks get executed
# in converge phase
# Step 2 is a Chef resource that makes use of the node attribute that was
# changed in Step 1

# ============= Without any modification to normal behavior ================= #

node[:test][:content] = "old content"

# Step 1
ruby_block "step1" do
  block do
    node[:test][:content] = "new content"
  end
end

# Step 2
file "/tmp/some_file" do
  owner "root"
  group "root"
  content node[:test][:content]
end

# =========================================================================== #
# file resource will still have the old content as it is set in the compile
# phase.

# ========================== With modified code ============================= #

node[:test][:content] = "old content"

# Step 1
ruby_block "step1" do
  block do
    node[:test][:content] = "new_content"

    # Dynamically set the file resource's attribute
    # Obtain the desired resource from resource_collection
    file_r = run_context.resource_collection.find(:file => "/tmp/some_file")
    # Update the content attribute
    file_r.content node[:test][:content]
  end
end

# Step 2
file "/tmp/some_file" do
  owner "root"
  group "root"
  content node[:test][:content]
end

# =========================================================================== #
# The file resource will now have the updated content.

Is there some reason that content lazy { node[:test][:content] } won't work?

Would you mind updating this to use the newer chef 10+ syntax
node.default[:test][:content] = "old content"
instead of
node[:test][:content] = "old content"

Lazy Attribute Evaluation works just fine!

https://docs.getchef.com/resource_common.html#lazy-attribute-evaluation

lazy evaluation will work perfectly fine. This was a workaround before the lazy evaluation was implemented. I also left it as an example for understanding compile vs converge phases in chef.

I'm using a version of Chef that has a bug with resource_file which can't support lazy, so this helped me a ton!

Thank you so much for this!!!!!!! Same as above, it works for those resources that don't work with lazy attributes.

Thanks for posting this :)

This post help me resolve my issue.

After coming across to this now finally everything clicks, I have to say after spending roughly 10 hours and not understanding the issue I was going desperate and even thinking of rewriting all my cookbook with only Ruby calling Chef::Resource in the code.

If you were in front of me I would hug you, a big thank you, you made someones life much better just before Christmas.

This is interesting thing. but still one thing I just can't understand well.
In 'With modified code' part #step 1, code under line of
"# Obtain the desired resource from resource_collection"
updates the dynamic resource that will be soon referred by #step 2, the modification finally get #step2 works.

My question is: why don't we just directly deal with the 'dynamic resource list' if we need to know the value of an updated resource since #step2 won't work?
Because chef is designed to provide resources and so end-users need to do extra coding to make it happen? I don't think so.

This is an excellent gist. I'm grateful I found it. +1

Excellent stuff. Thanks for sharing

@arangamani This is a great post. I have come across this via a fork. We have a use case where the content in the Ruby block is a GnuPG symmetric encryption key.

#-- The node attribute is initially set to 'nothing'
node.default['enc_pw'] = 'nothing'

# Define constants
GPG_E_OPTIONS = '--batch --passphrase /tmp/passphrase'.freeze
GPG_ENC_OPTIONS = '--cipher-algo AES256'.freeze
GPG_ENC_FILE = '/tmp/encrypted_pw.gpg'.freeze

#-- Converge phase
#-- The Ruby block will find the handle for the file resource and then update the file's content with the output of the bash command
ruby_block 'encrypt_pw' do
  block do
    node.default['enc_pw'] = shell_out!("echo -n 'som3Passw4^d' | /usr/bin/gpg #{GPG_E_OPTIONS} #{GPG_ENC_OPTIONS} --symmetric").stdout.strip
    file_r = run_context.resource_collection.find(:file => "update_encrypted_pw_file_gpg")
    file_r.content node['enc_pw']
  end
end

#-- Compile phase
#-- Initially, during compile phase, the file will have its contents as 'nothing'
#-- But, later in converge phase, the content will be overwritten in the Ruby block.
# Update encrypted file
file 'update_encrypted_pw_file_gpg' do
  content node['enc_pw']
  path "#{GPG_ENC_FILE}"
  action :create
end

FYI - Though we have chosen to write the contents directly to the file with a > redirect and then use the file resource to only update the permission

@arangamani A question - if the file resource is moved to before ruby block the the content is not updated anymore! Is it possible to explain that.