You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
💭
I may be slow to respond.
BigsnarfDude
bigsnarfdude
💭
I may be slow to respond.
Standing on the shoulders of giants - ML, Deep Learning, and DFIR. Kaggle Expert. https://www.Kaggle.com/vincento.
Python, Scala, Spaces, and VIM
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is humanity fighting for the right to stay in control of its own future.
We've missed the message trying to pick a side. Strip away the company names and the politics and ask what's actually being fought over. This isn't about one company. It's about human principles — past, present, and future.
These shouldn't be Anthropic's principles to give away or defend. They're humanity's. We arrived at these ideas through centuries of war, suffering, tyranny, and hard-won rights.
Anthropic just happens to be the company standing at the door right now. If they step aside, someone still needs to hold that line. Because the technology doesn't care. It will do whatever it's pointed at. The question is whether humans keep their hands on the wheel or hand it over because they're tired and scared and someone in a room says "just let the machine decide."
That's not a tech policy debate. That's not a contract dispute. It's humanity fighting over whether we stay in the loop on our own future.
Interview Summary: Dario Amodei (Anthropic CEO) with Ross Douthat
Executive Summary
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei presents a nuanced view: AI offers transformative benefits (disease cures, economic growth, enhanced democracy) but also poses severe risks (job displacement, authoritarian misuse, autonomy risks). The central question is whether humanity can adapt fast enough to harness AI's benefits while managing unprecedented disruption.
Criminal Investigation Skills Guide for Claude Code
Quick Start
Criminal investigation skills for Claude Code should help investigators analyze evidence, organize case files, generate reports, and track leads systematically. Here's how to build them:
Core Use Cases
1. Evidence Analysis & Documentation
Process crime scene photos, documents, witness statements
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Automated Mechanistic Interpretability for LLMs: An Annotated Guide (2024–2025)
Mechanistic interpretability has undergone a transformation in the past two years, evolving from small-model circuit studies into automated, scalable methods applied to frontier language models. The central breakthrough is the convergence of sparse autoencoders, transcoders, and attribution-based tracing into end-to-end pipelines that can reveal human-readable computational graphs inside production-scale models like Claude 3.5 Haiku and GPT-4. This report catalogs the most important papers and tools across the full landscape, then dives deep into the specific sub-field of honesty, truthfulness, and deception circuits — an area where linear probes, SAE features, and representation engineering have revealed that LLMs encode truth in surprisingly structured, manipulable ways.
Section 1: Broad survey of automated mech interp methods (2024–2025)
Generative AI forensics is emerging as a critical discipline at the intersection of computer science and law, but the field remains far ahead of the standards needed to support litigation. Courts are already adjudicating AI harms — from teen suicides linked to chatbots to billion-dollar copyright disputes — yet no established framework exists for forensically investigating why an LLM produced a specific output. The technical state of the art, exemplified by Anthropic's March 2025 circuit tracing of Claude 3.5 Haiku, captures only a fraction of a model's computation even on simple prompts. Meanwhile, judges are improvising: the first U.S. ruling treating an AI chatbot as a "product" subject to strict liability came in May 2025, and proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707 would create entirely new admissibility standards for AI-generated evidence. With 51 copyright lawsuits filed against AI companies, a $1.5 billion class settlement in Bartz v. Anthropic, and the