Last active
October 10, 2019 14:41
-
-
Save bladedoyle/421d3f508945bdf59c93d515ee420fc9 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
grin share value notes
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Pool finds block 4300 - https://grinscan.net/block/4300 | |
Secondary scale = 529 | |
scale = factor = Scaling difficulty = | |
for primary pow (cuckatooN solution) where N>=31 = 2^(1+EDGEBITS-24)*N | |
for secondary pow - (cuckatoo29 solution) = variable, retargeted every block, stored as header field "secondary_scaling" | |
Example: Three workers contributed shares: | |
Worker A submitted 50 cuckaroo29 shares | |
Worker B submitted 25 cuckaroo29 shares and | |
10 cuckatoo31 shares | |
Worker C submitted 5 cuckatoo32 shares | |
How much is eash share type worth compared with the others? | |
A cuckaroo29 share has scale: | |
max(share target, solution scale) | |
= max(29, 529) (where 529 is the blocks "secondary_scaling") | |
= 529 | |
A cuckatoo31 share has scale: | |
2^(N-23)*N | |
= 2^(31-23)*31 | |
= 2^8 * 31 | |
= 7936 | |
A cuckatoo32 share has scale: | |
2^(N-23)*N | |
= 2^(32-23)*32 | |
= 2^9 * 32 | |
= 16384 | |
so, total share value submitted is: | |
cuckaroo29 shares: 529 * 75 = 39675 | |
+ cuckatoo31 shares: 7936 * 10 = 79360 | |
+ cuckatoo32 shares: 16384 * 5 = 81920 | |
= 200955 | |
The block reward is 60 grin (assume no tx fees) | |
The pool will pay Worker A: | |
((50 * 529) / 200955) * 60 | |
= (26450 / 200955) * 60 | |
= 0.131621507 * 60 | |
= 7.89729042 Grin | |
The pool will pay Worker B: | |
(((25 * 529) + (10 * 7936)) / 200955) * 60 | |
= 0.460725038 * 60 | |
= 27.64350228 Grin | |
The pool will pay Worker C: | |
((5 * 16384) / 200955) * 60 | |
= 0.407653455 *60 | |
= 24.459207285 Grin |
Math is based largely on:
https://www.grin-forum.org/t/what-to-mine-choosing-between-cuckatoo31-and-cuckaroo29/1732
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
that's the reason behind this complexity? How did you get exactly this numbers? Is any simple explanation? thanks