bmorphism · July 15, 2023 06:05
diff --git a/gistfile1.txt b/gistfile1.txt
 1. Concept: 

 The user interacts with SumeruNet through simple cuneiform prompts written on a clay tablet interface. SumeruNet employs a diffusion process to gradually clarify the meaning and form of the desired conceptual output.

 2. Input Controls:

 • Cuneiform Prompts: The user writes brief descriptive sentences in cuneiform on a virtual clay writing surface. These basic prompts set the initial goals and concepts for SumeruNet.

 • Conditional Tokens: The user adds specialized cuneiform tokens to the prompt to specify conditional attributes like colors, materials, object types, etc. This constrains and guides the output within Sumerian artistic conventions.

 • Mode Tokens: The user selects pre-defined mode tokens corresponding to use cases like building designs, artistic renderings, trade agreements, etc. This activates default conditions and goals within that domain.  

 • Refinement Iterations: The user makes small changes to the cuneiform prompt after each generated output to gradually refine the conceptualization. SumeruNet incorporates this iterative user feedback into subsequent iterations.   

 • Explanations: SumeruNet provides annotations in cuneiform describing how it interpreted the user's prompt and conditional tokens. This helps build trust and make the control more intuitive.

 • Clarification Prompts: SumeruNet periodically suggests additional cuneiform prompts for the user to provide further constraints as the conceptualization progresses.

 3. Dataset:

 SumeruNet is initially trained on cuneiform tablets containing a wide range of Sumerian textual genres - administrative records, literary texts, lexical lists, etc. - to capture the full stylistic range of Sumerian conceptualizations.

 Does this help convey the spirit of what you had in mind? I tried to capture the key themes from your previous responses in a Sumerian clay tablet + cuneiform conceptualization framework. Let me know if you have any other questions!
	1. Concept:

	The user interacts with SumeruNet through simple cuneiform prompts written on a clay tablet interface. SumeruNet employs a diffusion process to gradually clarify the meaning and form of the desired conceptual output.

	2. Input Controls:

	• Cuneiform Prompts: The user writes brief descriptive sentences in cuneiform on a virtual clay writing surface. These basic prompts set the initial goals and concepts for SumeruNet.

	• Conditional Tokens: The user adds specialized cuneiform tokens to the prompt to specify conditional attributes like colors, materials, object types, etc. This constrains and guides the output within Sumerian artistic conventions.

	• Mode Tokens: The user selects pre-defined mode tokens corresponding to use cases like building designs, artistic renderings, trade agreements, etc. This activates default conditions and goals within that domain.

	• Refinement Iterations: The user makes small changes to the cuneiform prompt after each generated output to gradually refine the conceptualization. SumeruNet incorporates this iterative user feedback into subsequent iterations.

	• Explanations: SumeruNet provides annotations in cuneiform describing how it interpreted the user's prompt and conditional tokens. This helps build trust and make the control more intuitive.

	• Clarification Prompts: SumeruNet periodically suggests additional cuneiform prompts for the user to provide further constraints as the conceptualization progresses.

	3. Dataset:

	SumeruNet is initially trained on cuneiform tablets containing a wide range of Sumerian textual genres - administrative records, literary texts, lexical lists, etc. - to capture the full stylistic range of Sumerian conceptualizations.

	Does this help convey the spirit of what you had in mind? I tried to capture the key themes from your previous responses in a Sumerian clay tablet + cuneiform conceptualization framework. Let me know if you have any other questions!