Created
September 22, 2025 12:59
-
-
Save brandonbryant12/469f02a44fab26a474fbae29b25f8ea9 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| ### Limitations of Ingress Annotations for Custom 503 Responses | |
| - **No Direct Customization for Default 503 Errors**: The AWS Load Balancer Controller (LBC) Ingress annotations do not support modifying the response body or content of the default HTTP 503 "Service Unavailable" error that the Application Load Balancer (ALB) generates when a target group has no healthy or registered targets (e.g., no healthy pods). This is a core limitation of the ALB service itself, where such errors are handled at the infrastructure level before traffic reaches Kubernetes resources, and no annotations expose controls to override the hardcoded response. | |
| - **Health Check Annotations Are Insufficient**: Annotations like `alb.ingress.kubernetes.io/healthcheck-*` (e.g., path, protocol, success-codes) only configure how the ALB determines target health but do not influence the error response when all targets fail health checks. They cannot inject custom content into the ALB's failure response. | |
| - **Action Annotations Not Applicable for Conditional Errors**: While `alb.ingress.kubernetes.io/actions.${action-name}` allows defining fixed-response actions (e.g., returning a custom 503 with a message body for specific paths or rules), this is for static listener rule configurations and not conditional on backend health status. It cannot dynamically trigger based on no healthy pods without additional setup. | |
| - **General Scope Restrictions**: Annotations focus on load balancer attributes, routing, security, and health checks but lack error-page handling features common in other controllers. This persists in the latest LBC versions, with no updates addressing custom error bodies for no-healthy-target scenarios. | |
| ### Options to Achieve Custom 503 Responses Without Relying Solely on Annotations | |
| If annotations alone are insufficient, consider these workarounds, which often involve additional Kubernetes resources or architectural changes: | |
| 1. **Fallback (Maintenance) Pod Workaround**: Deploy a dedicated pod in the same target group (via shared Service selector) that always fails ALB health checks (e.g., returns 404 on the health check path) but responds to traffic with a custom 503 and message (e.g., "OOPS!" via Nginx config). Leverage the ALB's "fail-open" behavior, which routes traffic to all targets (including the fallback) when none are healthy. This is a common, annotation-free method for dynamic scenarios and can be enabled only in dev environments via Helm values. | |
| 2. **Switch to a Different Ingress Controller**: Use NGINX Ingress Controller or similar, which supports custom error pages via annotations like `nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/custom-http-errors` and `nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/error-pages` to serve tailored 503 responses from a backend server or static content when upstream fails. | |
| 3. **Layer Additional AWS Services**: Place CloudFront or AWS WAF in front of the ALB to handle custom error responses (e.g., from an S3-hosted page) for 503 codes, though this requires manual configuration and isn't tied directly to pod health. For planned maintenance, manually update ALB listener rules to a fixed-response action, but this isn't automated for unplanned no-healthy-pod events. | |
| 4. **Application-Level Handling**: Modify your application to return custom 503 responses during unhealthy states, but this doesn't cover cases where pods are completely down or scaled to zero, as traffic wouldn't reach them. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment