Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@bytespider
Forked from 140bytes/LICENSE.txt
Created June 4, 2011 11:46
Show Gist options
  • Save bytespider/1007834 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save bytespider/1007834 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
140byt.es -- convert string to array of UTF-8 bytes
// http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8
function stringToByteArray(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i){
for(
b = [
e =
d = 0
] // initialise variables
;
c = a.charCodeAt(d++) // get the character code from the string
;
){
g = 128;
c < g // under 128 is UTF-8 (ASCII range), 1 byte
?
b[e] = c // add to byte array
:
c < 2048 // under 2048 2bytes
?
f = 1 // number of bytes left to process
:
c < 65536 // under 65536 is 3bytes
?
f = 2 // number of bytes left to process
:
c < 2<<20 ? // finally, under 2097152 is 4bytes
f = 3 // 3bytes left to process
:
0
;
for( // process the remaining bytes indicated by `f`
h = e++,
i = f
;
f-- > 0 // -1 and check if greater than 0 still
;
b[h] = g + (2<<(6-i)) + (c >> i*6) // move onto the next slot in the byte array
)
b[e++] = g + (c >> f*6 & 63) // shift f * 6 bits, mask 1byte and add 128
}
return b // return the byte array
}
function(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i){for(b=[e=d=0];c=a.charCodeAt(d++);){g=128;c<g?b[e]=c:c<2048?f=1:c<65536?f=2:c<2<<20?f=3:0;for(h=e++,i=f;f-- >0;b[h]=g+(2<<6-i)+(c>>i*6))b[e++]=g+(c>>f*6&63)}return b}
DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, December 2004
Copyright (C) 2011 YOUR_NAME_HERE <YOUR_URL_HERE>
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified
copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long
as the name is changed.
DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION
0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO.
{
"name": "stringToByteArray",
"description": "Convert a string of characters to an array of UTF-8 bytes",
"keywords": [
"cryptography",
"utf8"
]
}
function stringToByteArray(str) {
var bytes = [], code, i;
for(i = 0; i < str.length; i++) {
code = str.charCodeAt(i);
if (code < 128) {
bytes.push(code);
} else if (code < 2048) {
bytes.push(192+(code>>6), 128+(code&63));
} else if (code < 65536) {
bytes.push(224+(code>>12), 128+((code>>6)&63), 128+(code&63));
} else if (code < 2097152) {
bytes.push(240+(code>>18), 128+((code>>12)&63), 128+((code>>6)&63), 128+(code&63));
}
}
return bytes;
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<title>stringToByteArray</title>
<div>Expected value: <b id="ret"></b></div>
<div>Actual value: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b id="ret2"></b></div>
<script>
// write a small example that shows off the API for your example
// and tests it in one fell swoop.
function stringToByteArrayOld(str) {
var bytes = [], code, i;
for(i = 0; i < str.length; i++) {
code = str.charCodeAt(i);
if (code < 128) {
bytes.push(code);
} else if (code < 2048) {
bytes.push(192+(code>>6), 128+(code&63));
} else if (code < 65536) {
bytes.push(224+(code>>12), 128+((code>>6)&63), 128+(code&63));
} else if (code < 2097152) {
bytes.push(240+(code>>18), 128+((code>>12)&63), 128+((code>>6)&63), 128+(code&63));
}
}
return bytes;
}
function stringToByteArray(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i){for(b=[e=d=0];c=a.charCodeAt(d++);){g=128;c<g?b[e]=c:c<2048?f=1:c<65536?f=2:c<2<<20?f=3:0;for(h=e++,i=f;f-- >0;b[h]=g+(2<<6-i)+(c>>i*6))b[e++]=g+(c>>f*6&63)}return b};
document.getElementById( "ret" ).innerHTML = stringToByteArrayOld("hello☺䭢 it works")
document.getElementById( "ret2" ).innerHTML = stringToByteArray("hello☺䭢 it works")
</script>
@mathiasbynens
Copy link

FWIW, the demo doesn’t seem to work for me.

@subzey
Copy link

subzey commented Jun 4, 2011

Something like encodeURIComponent("Привет мир").split('%')) may help you with non-ascii utf8

@bytespider
Copy link
Author

@subzey: I'll try that route, but its possible that may make things more complicated

@bytespider
Copy link
Author

i thought about using >>= to shift of 6 bits at a time leaving only the bits required for the next operation

@mikesherov
Copy link

Hey, got it down to 202 bytes by refactoring the complex b[e] calcs to happen in the for loop... the comments are all mangled and nonsense now, but that shaves off about 10 bytes. I'm sure there are more savings in there with some trickery: https://gist.github.com/1008218

@mikesherov
Copy link

Hey, I see this has been updated! You adding similar refactors to what I just did! looking for more...

@bytespider
Copy link
Author

Yes I took my working code and applied what I could see the major changes from yours were to find out what bits were breaking.

@mikesherov
Copy link

looks like you can drop the parens around (f=3), no?

@bytespider
Copy link
Author

No you'll get and Invalid left hand side assignment error. just realised my demo also fails

@mikesherov
Copy link

also, since you're no longer modifying g, instead of doing "g =128; c < g ...", you can do "c < g=128 .." I believe...

@mikesherov
Copy link

Oh, same problem :-\

@mikesherov
Copy link

Also, it looks like the compressed version is different from the annotated version...
compressed has: "b[h]=(2<<5-f)+(c>>6_i)"
annotated has: "b[h] = (2<<(5-f)) + (c >> 6_i)"

compressed reveals the truth: multiplication and addition/subtraction have higher precedence than bitwise shifts

@bytespider
Copy link
Author

Oh so i've been chasing a none existant bug!? Damn!

@mikesherov
Copy link

another byte gone:
old:
"c<2<<20&&(f=3);"
new
"c<2<<20?f=3:0;"

@mikesherov
Copy link

FOUND THE BUG: g_4 is not 2048 :-.
old:
"c<g_4"
new:
"c<2048"

@mikesherov
Copy link

deleted

@mikesherov
Copy link

@bytespider
Copy link
Author

Can get it to 184bytes if we assume that we'll only have 4byte characters

@mikesherov
Copy link

Could save 4 bytes by doing "f=c<2048?1:..." instead of "c<2048?f=1:...". Also another 2 bytes if you do "i=f=c<2048..." and get rid of ",i=f"

@mikesherov
Copy link

Another byte: "65536" -> "g<<9"

@subzey
Copy link

subzey commented Jun 5, 2011

@bytespider https://gist.github.com/1008764 the encodeURIComponent based version. It's 132 bytes in length (wrapped) and works well.

@jed
Copy link

jed commented Jul 11, 2011

hey @bytespider, could you take the trailing comma out of your package.json keywords?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment