Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@cabecada
Created January 30, 2023 12:45
Show Gist options
  • Save cabecada/3507ea943fe87df10aa65f5c46c490d1 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save cabecada/3507ea943fe87df10aa65f5c46c490d1 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Fun with chatgpt
my postgresql database is running very slow. there are some I/O errors on disks too. when I run the query on replica it is fast. what to check for slowness
There are a few things you can check to try and identify the cause of the slow performance on your PostgreSQL database:
Check the system load and resource usage on the server where the database is running. High CPU or memory usage could be causing the slow performance.
Check the I/O activity on the disks where the database files are stored. High I/O wait time or a high number of I/O errors can indicate a problem with the storage system.
Check the PostgreSQL log files for any error messages or warning that may indicate a problem with the database.
Check the database's configuration settings and see if any of the parameters are set incorrectly, which may be causing poor performance.
Identify slow-running queries by using tools such as the PostgreSQL's built-in pgAdmin, slow query log, or other third-party tools like pg_stat_statements.
Check the replication lag, as it can cause slow performance if the replica is not in sync with the primary.
Check if there is any Network latency, which can cause slow performance if the database is running on a remote server.
It's worth noting that the replica being faster could be due to it having different hardware or a different workload, so it's important to investigate the root cause of the slowness in your specific environment.
Vijaykumar Jain
my query looks up tables that are updated heavily but are small, still it takes long. how to tune the query or improve db response
If your query is looking up tables that are updated heavily but are small, and it is taking a long time to run, there are a few things you can try to improve the performance:
Indexing: Make sure that the columns that are being used in the WHERE clause of the query are indexed. This will allow the database to quickly locate the relevant rows and improve query performance.
Analyze the table: Running the ANALYZE command on the table(s) being queried can help the database optimizer to create better query plans.
Use the EXPLAIN command: Use the EXPLAIN command to see the query plan that the database is using to execute your query. This can help you identify if the query is using the indexes or if the query plan could be improved.
Use partitioning: If the table is partitioned on the column that is used in the WHERE clause, it can improve the query performance.
Use caching: If the data in the table is not changing frequently, you can consider caching the query results to improve the performance.
Materialized View: If you are querying the same data frequently, you can consider creating a Materialized View.
Try to avoid using SELECT * in your queries, instead select only the columns you need.
Reviewing and optimizing your query, to check if the JOIN or subquery can be simplified or removed.
It's also worth noting that the performance of a query can be affected by a number of factors, such as the amount of data in the table, the complexity of the query, and the workload on the server. So, it may be necessary to monitor the performance of the query over time and make adjustments as necessary.
Vijaykumar Jain
should I check for table bloat also
Table bloat can also be a cause of slow performance for a PostgreSQL database. Table bloat occurs when there are a large number of dead rows in a table, caused by frequent updates or deletes, which can cause the table to become larger than it needs to be. This can slow down queries that need to scan the table, as the database has to read through more data than is necessary.
To check for table bloat, you can use the pg_table_size and pg_indexes_size functions to check the size of the table and its indexes, respectively. You can then compare the size of the table and indexes to the amount of data that is actually in the table by using the count(*) function. If the size of the table and indexes is much larger than the amount of data in the table, then the table is likely suffering from bloat.
You can also use the pgstattuple extension to check the bloat in table.
To alleviate table bloat, you can use the VACUUM and VACUUM FULL commands to reclaim space, or the CLUSTER command to reorder the table according to its clustered index.
It's also worth noting that PostgreSQL version 10 and above, has an automatic feature called "Autovacuum" which help to keep the table bloat in check.
If you find that table bloat is causing slow performance, you may want to schedule regular VACUUM or CLUSTER operations or tune your autovacuum settings.
Vijaykumar Jain
I need to shard postgresql database. which technique is good for data that has high cardinality
Sharding a PostgreSQL database involves partitioning the data across multiple servers to improve performance and scalability. There are several techniques for sharding a PostgreSQL database, but the best approach will depend on the characteristics of your data.
For data that has high cardinality, meaning that the data has a large number of distinct values, a good technique to use is "Range-based sharding".
Range-based sharding involves partitioning the data based on a specific range of values in a column. For example, you can split data into ranges based on a timestamp, or a user's ID. This allows you to easily distribute data across multiple servers and also allows for efficient querying of the data.
Another technique that can be used to shard data with high cardinality is "Hash-based sharding". This technique partitions data based on a hash of a specific column. It works well when the data doesn't have a natural range and it's hard to come up with a good range-based sharding key.
It's worth noting that sharding can also be done in a combined approach, where range-based and hash-based sharding are used together.
Before sharding, it's important to consider the impact on the application's architecture, as well as the complexity of managing a sharded environment, with the benefits of improved scalability and performance.
It's also important to use a sharding tool or library that is compatible with PostgreSQL and that provides a transparent sharding experience to the application. There are several open-source libraries available like pg_shard, pgpool-II, or Citus that can help you with sharding your PostgreSQL database.
Vijaykumar Jain
but which would be the best approach if I want to rebalance or Reshard the existing shards without downtime
Rebalancing or resharding an existing sharded PostgreSQL database without downtime can be challenging, as it requires careful planning and execution to minimize the impact on the application's availability.
One approach to achieving this is to use "Online Rebalancing" or "Online Resharding" techniques. These techniques involve creating new shards and gradually migrating data from the existing shards to the new shards, while the application continues to operate.
One way to accomplish this is to use a "Proxy-based" solution. This involves using a proxy layer that sits between the application and the database. The proxy layer can route queries to the appropriate shard and can also handle the migration of data between shards. This allows the application to continue to operate while the data is being migrated.
Another approach is to use "Logical replication" feature of PostgreSQL to replicate the data to a new shard and then switch the application to the new shard. This can be done using tools like pg_shard, pgpool-II, or Citus which provide the functionality of online resharding using logical replication.
It's worth noting that, whichever approach you choose, it's important to thoroughly test the process and have a rollback plan in case of any issues. Additionally, it's important to monitor the performance and availability of the application during the process to ensure that the impact on the application's availability is minimized.
Vijaykumar Jain
can 2 phase commit help in resharding
Two-phase commit (2PC) is a distributed transaction protocol that can be used to ensure that multiple databases or other resources are updated in a consistent and atomic manner. It can be used to ensure that data is updated across multiple databases, but it doesn't provide a direct solution for resharding a sharded database.
2PC can be used as a technique to help ensure the consistency of data during a resharding operation, but it would need to be used in conjunction with other techniques. For example, during the resharding process, you can use 2PC to ensure that data is updated in the new shard and the old shard in a consistent manner, while using other techniques such as logical replication or proxy-based routing to handle the migration of data between shards.
It's worth noting that using 2PC increases the complexity of the resharding process and can also increase the duration of the process. Additionally, there are other resharding techniques that can be used without the need for 2PC.
It's important to plan and test the resharding process thoroughly before implementing it in a production environment, and to monitor the performance and availability of the application during the process to ensure that the impact on the application's availability is minimized.
Vijaykumar Jain
write postgresql code to create an min max aggregate
In PostgreSQL, you can create a new aggregate function using the CREATE AGGREGATE command. To create a new aggregate function that calculates the minimum and maximum values of a column, you can use the following code:
Copy code
CREATE AGGREGATE min_max (sfunc = min, stype = anynonarray,
finalfunc = max, finaltyp = anynonarray);
The sfunc and stype parameters define the function and data type used for the intermediate state during the aggregate calculation. In this case, the min function and the anynonarray data type are used.
The finalfunc and finaltyp parameters define the function and data type used for the final result of the aggregate calculation. In this case, the max function and the anynonarray data type are used.
Once you've created the aggregate function, you can use it in a query like this:
Copy code
SELECT min_max(column_name) FROM table_name;
This will return the minimum and maximum values of the column_name in the table_name table.
It's worth noting that this is a very simple example, and depending on the use case, you may need to customize the aggregate function to handle different types of data, or to handle NULL values in a specific way.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment