Exploring the 1BRC in Ruby with Ractors

1brc_ractors.rb

#!/usr/bin/env ruby --yjit
WORKER_THREADS = 4
CHUNK_SIZE = 2**16

# BUG: my city struct is being corrupted when moving from the worker to the main ractor.
# `#<struct City min=-11.3, tot=24088.30000000004, max=64.6, n=1164>` becomes
# `#<struct City min=-11.3, tot=24088.30000000004, max=64.6, n=nil>`, note that each `n` attribute becomes `nil`.
# https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20165

# I tried changing the Struct to a simple array and still using `move: true`,
# but I ran into similar data corruption issues! So I'm going to switch to `move: false`,
# it's not a huge deal in this case since it's just one hash per worker copied at the end.

City = Struct.new(:min, :tot, :max, :n)
def city_hash = Hash.new { |h,k| h[k] = City[Float::INFINITY,0,-Float::INFINITY,0] }

workers = (1..WORKER_THREADS).map do
  Ractor.new do
    cities = city_hash
    while chunk = Ractor.receive
      chunk.each_line do |line|
        name,val = line.split(";")
        city = cities[name]
        city.n += 1
        val = val.to_f
        city.min = val if val < city.min
        city.max = val if val > city.max
        city.tot += val
      end
    end
    cities
  end
end

# map step
nchunks = 0
infile = File.open('measurements.txt', 'rb')
round = workers.cycle
until infile.eof?
  chunk = infile.read CHUNK_SIZE
  # ensure we're on a line boundary
  chunk += infile.readline unless infile.eof?
  ractor = round.next
  ractor << chunk.freeze # needs backpressure
  nchunks += 1
  # break if nchunks > 5_000
end

# reduce step
results = city_hash
workers.each do |ractor|
  ractor << nil # signal done
  cities = ractor.take
  cities.each do |name,o|
    city = results[name]
    city.min = o.min if o.min < city.min
    city.max = o.max if o.max > city.max
    city.tot += o.tot
    city.n += o.n
  end
end

results.sort_by(&:first).each{|n,c|
  puts "%s=%.1f/%.1f/%.1f" % [n,c.min,c.tot/c.n,c.max]
}

1brc_ractors_backpressure.rb

#!/usr/bin/env ruby --yjit
require 'async'
require 'async/queue'
WORKER_THREADS = 4
CHUNK_SIZE = 2**16
Q_SIZE = 10_000
City = Struct.new(:min, :tot, :max, :n)
def city_hash = Hash.new { |h,k| h[k] = City[Float::INFINITY,0,-Float::INFINITY,0] }

workers = (1..WORKER_THREADS).map do
  Ractor.new(Ractor.current) do |main_ractor|
    cities = city_hash
    while chunk = main_ractor.take
      chunk.each_line do |line|
        name,val = line.split(";")
        city = cities[name]
        city.n += 1
        val = val.to_f
        city.min = val if val < city.min
        city.max = val if val > city.max
        city.tot += val
      end
    end
    cities
  end
end

# map step
Async do
  chunks = Async::LimitedQueue.new(Q_SIZE)
  reader = Async do
    nchunks = 0
    infile = File.open('measurements.txt', 'rb')
    until infile.eof?
      chunk = infile.read CHUNK_SIZE
      # ensure we're on a line boundary
      chunk += infile.readline unless infile.eof?
      chunks << chunk.freeze
      nchunks += 1
      # break if nchunks > 5_000
    end
    chunks << nil
  end
  chunks.each { |c| Ractor.yield c }
end

# reduce step
results = city_hash
workers.size.times { Ractor.yield nil } # signal done
workers.each do |ractor|
  cities = ractor.take
  cities.each do |name,o|
    city = results[name]
    city.min = o.min if o.min < city.min
    city.max = o.max if o.max > city.max
    city.tot += o.tot
    city.n += o.n
  end
end

results.sort_by(&:first).each{|n,c|
  puts "%s=%.1f/%.1f/%.1f" % [n,c.min,c.tot/c.n,c.max]
}

1brc_single_thread.rb

#!/usr/bin/env ruby --yjit
City = Struct.new(:min, :tot, :max, :n)
cities = Hash.new { |h,k| h[k] = City[Float::INFINITY,0,-Float::INFINITY,0] }

File.open('measurements.txt', 'rb').each_line do |line|
  name,val = line.split(";")
  city = cities[name]
  city.n += 1
  val = Float(val)
  city.min = val if val < city.min
  city.max = val if val > city.max
  city.tot += val
end

cities.sort_by(&:first).each{|n,c|
  puts "%s=%.1f/%.1f/%.1f" % [n,c.min,c.tot/c.n,c.max]
}

Do you also have better results for Ractors with less workers? 8 Ractors almost twice slower than 4 for me

https://github.com/simpl1g/1brc/blob/main/README.md?plain=1#L59-L69

Hey! Cool gist. Ractors are exciting but unfortunately still experimental. I shamelessly took this as a base and updated it to use ZMQ. It forks workers and communicates with them over ZMQ sockets.

https://gist.github.com/paddor/471586839f69fe2d74f219731b861be4#file-1brc_zmq-rb

On my old MBP 2019 it completes within 162.58 sec:

$ time pv --rate --average-rate --progress ../measurements.txt | ./1brc_zmq.rb > agg.txt
main: 61827
worker 0: 61828
worker 1: 61829
worker 2: 61830
worker 3: 61831
worker 4: 61832
worker 5: 61833
worker 6: 61834
worker 7: 61835
worker 8: 61836
worker 9: 61837
worker 10: 61838
worker 11: 61839
worker 12: 61840
worker 13: 61841
worker 14: 61842
worker 15: 61843
[ 250MiB/s] [ 250MiB/s] [======================================================================>] 100%
main: all chunks sent to workers
main: sorting and printing ...
main: terminating workers: [61828, 61829, 61830, 61831, 61832, 61833, 61834, 61835, 61836, 61837, 61838, 61839, 61840, 61841, 61842, 61843]

________________________________________________________
Executed in  162.58 secs    fish           external
   usr time   29.64 mins    0.37 millis   29.64 mins
   sys time    1.46 mins    1.41 millis    1.46 mins

Nice! Current ractors seem to have surprising overhead, there's some discussion on this reddit thread with ractor perf vs a couple other forking solutions and yeah, current Ruby 3.3 ractors are so much slower than just forking. It doesn't seem related to getting the data into the ractors, I haven't looked any further but it feels like a locking or scheduling issue. Hopefully it's nothing fundamental and just a sign that ractors need further development.