APT-PAC - pacman with APT syntax

apt-pac.sh

#!/bin/bash

# Save this file as /usr/bin/apt-pac and chmod +x it.

case "$1" in 

	autoremove)
		pacman -Rns $(pacman -Qdtq);
	;;

	clean)
		if [ "$2" == "--force" ]; then
			pacman -Scc;
		else
			echo "Use \"apt-pac clean --force\" to remove all packages from cache.";
			pacman -Sc;
		fi;
	;;

	changelog)
		pacman -Qc "$2";
	;;

	download)
		pacman -Sw "$2";
	;;

	install)
		pacman -S "$2";
	;;

	policy)
		cat /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist | grep "^[^#]";
	;;

	rdepends)
		pacman -Sii "$2";
	;;

	remove)
		pacman -Rs "$2";
	;;

	search)
		pacman -Ss "$2";
	;;

	show)
		pacman -Qi "$2";
	;;

	update)
		if [ "$2" == "--force" ]; then
			pacman -Syy;
		else
			echo "Use \"apt-pac update --force\" to force-update packages index.";
			pacman -Sy;
		fi;
	;;

	upgrade)
		pacman -Su;
	;;


	*|help)

		echo "";
		echo "aptpac - pacman wrapper for apt-get syntax";
		echo "";
		echo "";
		echo "APT commands:";
		echo "";
		echo -e "\tautoremove, clean, update, upgrade, policy";
		echo "";
		echo "Package-specific commands:";
		echo "";
		echo -e "\tchangelog, download, install, rdepends, remove, search, show";
		echo "";
		echo "Command-specific flags:";
		echo -e "\t--force    can be used with clean, update to emulate same behaviour as aptitude.";
		echo "";
	;;

esac;

About this bit:

update)
	pacman -Syy;
;;

It is absolutely unnecessary to force refresh all repos, as it puts an additional (even if little) strain on the mirrors for no benefit, unless the user knows that their databases are broken, at which point one could run pacman -Syy by themselves. I know, the additional load is minuscule, but this little change is minuscule too, so why not? lol

Also I'm not sure about separate -Sy and -Su commands, as -Sy updates local repo listings but not packages, which counts as a partial upgrade which is not supported by Arch Linux and could cause all kinds of fun stuff with dependencies. Though, I'm not sure myself how to convert apt's separate update and upgrade things to still provide a good result and not cause a partial upgrade. I dunno, at least add a disclaimer comment please?

I dunno, at least add a disclaimer comment please?

Disclaimer: It's just a goddamn gist, not an AUR package and neither (hopefully) a git repository.
Do whatever you like with it.

I will, and I appreciate your work on this. I'm just more worried about other people not reading these comments, copying the entire thing and doing -Syy without -Su and potentially screwing up their system this way.

I mean, can't gists be edited? Is it too much effort to at least remove that one extra y?

@Architector4 I updated the gist to reflect the same behaviour, while hiding the force-clean and force-update behind a --force flag. I think this is the best compromise in this case.

Oh, that's good. Thanks!