Last active
December 24, 2015 23:49
-
-
Save crabmusket/6883758 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Working on a function to receive a line of serial data in Haskell.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
import qualified Data.ByteString.Char8 as B | |
import System.Hardware.Serialport (SerialPort, recv) | |
recvLn :: SerialPort -> IO B.ByteString | |
recvLn s = do | |
-- Receive one byte at a time. | |
first <- recv s 1 | |
rest <- if first == B.singleton '\n' | |
then return $ B.empty | |
else recvLn s | |
-- Once the recursion finishes, we glue the parts together. | |
return $ first `B.append` rest |
too many coments!
-- If the byte was a newline,
rest <- if first == B.pack "\n"
These lines are just the same, why write it twice? Other are also too obvious. Try to document nuances, not the codeflow.
@danbst I agree. I was initially worried about having no comments. I think I've struck more of a balance now! The first one may seem obvious, but I'm thinking of people who aren't familiar with the serialport
library.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Biggest concern right now is that it doesn't appear very lazy. I'm not sure how the compiler will actually shake it out, but in pureland some sort of
takeWhile
seems like the best solution. Not sure if that will be applicable here.But it works!