Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@ctalladen78
Last active October 30, 2025 15:14
Show Gist options
  • Save ctalladen78/55ccd010f5a2dc703240db601e3ae457 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save ctalladen78/55ccd010f5a2dc703240db601e3ae457 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Relative Price Comparison Normalize cost of living data across cities: Convert all prices to USD. Use Numbeo or LivingCost.io as cross-references for validation. Create a price index (e.g. NYC = 100, others relative to that)

To create a relative price comparison using cost-of-living data across cities, you'll want to normalize, validate, and index your figures. Here’s how you can structure it:


📊 Step-by-Step: Relative Price Index

  1. Collect Raw Cost Data

    • From sources like Nomad List, scrape or extract the monthly cost of living per city (ensure it's per individual, and includes rent).
    • Example raw data:
      {
        "New York City": 4500,
        "Bangkok": 1600,
        "Berlin": 2800,
        "Buenos Aires": 1200
      }
  2. Convert to a Common Currency

    • If your sources provide prices in various currencies, use ExchangeRate-API or an up-to-date source to convert everything to USD.
    • Use consistent exchange rates (e.g., pulled daily or weekly) and round to two decimals.
  3. Cross-Validate Prices

    • Pull the same city costs from Numbeo or LivingCost.io.
    • Average the values or flag outliers. You could assign confidence weights if a city’s cost differs across sources.
  4. Normalize via Indexing

    • Pick a baseline city (e.g. NYC = 100).
    • For each city: [ \text{Index} = \left( \frac{\text{City Cost}}{\text{NYC Cost}} \right) \times 100 ]
    • Example:
      NYC: $4500 → 100
      Berlin: $2800 → 62.2
      Buenos Aires: $1200 → 26.7
      
  5. Store & Visualize

    • Save normalized data in JSON or CSV:
      {
        "New York City": 100,
        "Bangkok": 35.6,
        "Berlin": 62.2,
        "Buenos Aires": 26.7
      }
    • Plot this on a choropleth map, bar chart, or scatter plot using Mapbox, D3.js, or Plotly.

Let me know if you’d like a ready-made Python script to do this—or want to combine this with map annotations and interactive filters. We can totally build a city explorer together.

A price index—like the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or a city-specific cost-of-living index—acts as a lens through which live rent data can be interpreted, normalized, and forecasted. Here’s how it plays a role in rent estimation:


🧮 1. Baseline Normalization

Price indexes allow you to compare rents across cities or time periods by adjusting for inflation or regional cost differences. For example:

  • If NYC has a price index of 100 and Austin has 70, a $2,000 rent in NYC would be roughly equivalent to $1,400 in Austin in terms of relative affordability.

📈 2. Trend Tracking

Indexes like the CPI Rent Index or Zillow Rent Index help track how rents are changing over time:

  • CPI Rent Index reflects long-term rent trends across all leases.
  • New Tenant Rent Index focuses on newly signed leases, offering a more real-time view.

This helps you distinguish between market shifts and seasonal noise.


🧠 3. Live Data Calibration

When pulling live rent data (e.g. from Zillow, RentCast, or Apartment List), price indexes help:

  • Smooth out anomalies (e.g. unusually high or low listings).
  • Adjust for inflation to compare historical vs. current rents.
  • Weight cities by cost-of-living to build fair comparisons.

🏙 4. Forecasting & Investment

Investors and analysts use price indexes to:

  • Predict future rent increases based on macroeconomic trends.
  • Identify undervalued or overvalued rental markets.
  • Adjust rent estimates for lease renewals or new developments.

If you're building a rent estimator or dashboard, integrating a price index layer can make your insights far more accurate and actionable. Want help wiring that into your data pipeline?

make an estimation system for nightly airbnb cost using historical airbnb data

Building a nightly Airbnb cost estimation system using historical data is a powerful way to predict pricing trends and optimize revenue. Here's a high-level blueprint to get you started:


🧠 1. Data Sources

Use platforms that offer historical Airbnb data:

  • AirDNA – Daily-level data on occupancy, ADR (average daily rate), and revenue.
  • Airbtics – Offers neighborhood-level insights and user demographics.
  • Mashvisor / AllTheRooms – Monthly-level data with investment metrics.

🛠 2. Core Features of the Estimation System

a. Input Parameters

  • Location (city, neighborhood, coordinates)
  • Property type (entire home, private room, etc.)
  • Bedrooms, bathrooms, amenities
  • Seasonality (month, holidays, events)
  • Historical occupancy and ADR

b. Estimation Logic

def estimate_nightly_rate(location, bedrooms, season, data):
    base_rate = data[location]['base_rate']
    occupancy = data[location]['occupancy'][season]
    multiplier = 1 + (0.1 * (bedrooms - 1))  # Adjust for size
    seasonal_factor = data[location]['seasonal_factor'][season]
    return round(base_rate * multiplier * seasonal_factor * occupancy, 2)

📈 3. Modeling Techniques

  • Linear regression for simple rate prediction.
  • Random Forest or XGBoost for more nuanced models using multiple features.
  • Time series forecasting (e.g., Prophet) for seasonal trends.

🌍 4. Map Integration

  • Use Mapbox or Leaflet.js to visualize estimated rates by location.
  • Color-code by affordability or occupancy rate.

💡 5. Validation

  • Cross-check with live listings or APIs (e.g., Zillow, RentCast).
  • Compare with Numbeo or LivingCost indexes for price normalization.

Would you like a working prototype in Python or a dashboard mockup to visualize this? I can help you build it step by step.

Awesome! Let’s build a nightly Airbnb cost estimator using historical data in Python. This first version will use a simplified dataset, and we can level it up with more features like seasonality, neighborhood trends, or events.


🧰 Step 1: Sample Dataset (Mocked for now)

We'll start with a sample dictionary of historical averages:

historical_data = {
    "New York City": {
        "base_rate": 250,
        "seasonal_factor": {
            "Jan": 0.9, "Jul": 1.2, "Dec": 1.4
        },
        "occupancy_rate": {
            "Jan": 0.65, "Jul": 0.85, "Dec": 0.95
        }
    },
    "Lisbon": {
        "base_rate": 120,
        "seasonal_factor": {
            "Jan": 0.7, "Jul": 1.5, "Dec": 1.3
        },
        "occupancy_rate": {
            "Jan": 0.5, "Jul": 0.9, "Dec": 0.8
        }
    }
}

🧠 Step 2: Estimation Function

def estimate_airbnb_rate(city, month, bedrooms=1, data=historical_data):
    info = data.get(city)
    if not info:
        return f"No data available for {city}"

    base = info["base_rate"]
    season_multiplier = info["seasonal_factor"].get(month, 1)
    occupancy = info["occupancy_rate"].get(month, 0.7)
    bedroom_factor = 1 + 0.15 * (bedrooms - 1)  # Adds 15% per extra bedroom

    estimated_rate = base * season_multiplier * bedroom_factor
    adjusted_rate = estimated_rate * occupancy
    return round(adjusted_rate, 2)

🧪 Example

print(estimate_airbnb_rate("Lisbon", "Jul", bedrooms=2))
# Output: e.g., $145.8 depending on data

🗺 Next Steps

  • 🗂 Import real historical data from AirDNA, Airbtics, or InsideAirbnb.
  • 📅 Add support for local events or day-of-week multipliers.
  • 📊 Build a dashboard with Streamlit, Plotly Dash, or Tableau Public.
  • 🧠 Optionally train a model (e.g. XGBoost) on a CSV dataset to handle more variables.

Would you like me to scaffold a Streamlit app or help set up real data pipelines next?

Ref

Below is a complete Python example showing how to integrate SerpAPI Places Search with LangChain to provide travel restaurant suggestions. This example uses OpenAI as the LLM and properly demonstrates retrieving Place data and generating recommendations.

# Language: Python  
  
# Necessary imports  
from langchain.chains import LLMChain
from langchain.prompts import PromptTemplate
from langchain.llms import OpenAI
import requests
# ----------------------------  
# SERPAPI SETTINGS  
# ----------------------------  
SERPAPI_API_KEY = "YOUR_SERPAPI_API_KEY"
GOOGLE_PLACES_ENDPOINT = "https://serpapi.com/search.json"
# Function to search restaurants with SerpAPI Places  
def search_restaurants(location: str, keyword: str = "restaurant", num_results: int = 5):
"""
Queries SerpAPI for restaurants in a given location.
"""
params = {
"engine": "google_maps",
"q": keyword,
"type": "search",
"location": location,
"api_key": SERPAPI_API_KEY
}
response = requests.get(GOOGLE_PLACES_ENDPOINT, params=params)
data = response.json()
restaurants = []
for place in data.get("local_results", [])[:num_results]:
restaurants.append({
"name": place.get("title"),
"address": place.get("address"),
"rating": place.get("rating")
})
return restaurants
# ----------------------------  
# LANGCHAIN SETTINGS  
# ----------------------------  
# Initialize the LLM  
llm = OpenAI(temperature=0.7)
# Define a prompt template for restaurant recommendations  
prompt_template = """
You are a travel assistant. Based on the following list of restaurants, generate a short, friendly travel recommendation:
{restaurants}
"""
prompt = PromptTemplate(
input_variables=["restaurants"],
template=prompt_template
)
# Setup LangChain LLMChain  
chain = LLMChain(llm=llm, prompt=prompt)
# ----------------------------  
# WORKFLOW EXAMPLE  
# ----------------------------  
if __name__ == "__main__":
location = "Chicago, IL"  # Example location
restaurants = search_restaurants(location, keyword="restaurant", num_results=5)
if restaurants:
restaurant_text = "
".join([f"{r['name']} (Rating: {r.get('rating', 'N/A')}) - {r['address']}" for r in restaurants])
# Generate travel-friendly recommendation using LangChain
recommendation = chain.run(restaurants=restaurant_text)
print("Travel Restaurant Suggestions:
")
print(recommendation)
else:
print("No restaurants found for this location.")

Leaflet map component

MyMap = ({ geoJsonData }) => {
    return (
        <MapContainer center={[45.0, -112.0]} zoom={13} style={{ height: "100vh", width: "100%" }}>
            <TileLayer url="https://{s}.tile.openstreetmap.org/{z}/{x}/{y}.png" />
            <GeoJSON data={geoJsonData} />
        </MapContainer>
    );

Key Notes:

  1. SerpAPI is used here with the google_maps engine to fetch restaurant information. Make sure you have a valid API key and enable Places results.
  2. The search_restaurants function formats the response into a list of restaurant dictionaries.
  3. LangChain is used to turn raw data into user-friendly travel suggestions using an LLM prompt.
  4. PromptTemplate ensures we control how the data is presented to the model for recommendation generation.
  5. Modify num_results or keyword to refine your search for specific cuisine types or other preferences.

Example Output:

Travel Restaurant Suggestions:
Chicago has some amazing dining options! You should check out Giordano's (Rating: 4.5) at 223 W Jackson Blvd, famous for its deep-dish pizza. Next, d’Agostino’s (Rating: 4.3) at 123 Main St offers great Italian flavors. For sushi lovers, visit Sushi Samba (Rating: 4.4) at 456 Lake Shore Dr. Don't miss out on Lou Malnati's (Rating: 4.6) for authentic Chicago pizza, or Shake Shack (Rating: 4.2) at 789 Michigan Ave for a delicious burger experience!

This workflow efficiently combines live restaurant data from SerpAPI with LangChain’s natural language capabilities to provide personalized travel suggestions.

Source(s):

This example demonstrates how to use LangChain with a CSV file to perform context-rich question answering over a dataset about city rankings, cost of living, affordability index, and average rent. It uses CSVAgent from LangChain to query structured data.

# Python  
  
# Necessary imports  
from langchain.agents import create_csv_agent
from langchain.chat_models import ChatOpenAI
import pandas as pd
# Example CSV content structure (you can save this as 'city_data.csv')  
"""
City,Ranking,Cost_of_Living,Basket_of_Goods,Affordability_Index,Average_Rent
New York,1,100,500,80,3000
Los Angeles,2,95,450,85,2800
Chicago,3,85,400,90,2200
Houston,4,75,380,95,1500
Austin,5,80,390,92,1800
"""
# Function to initialize CSV agent and query it  
def query_city_data(csv_path: str, question: str) -> str:
"""
Create a CSV Agent using LangChain to perform QA on city data.
Parameters:
- csv_path: str, the path to the CSV file  
    - question: str, the natural language question to ask about the dataset  
  
    Returns:
- str: Answer to the question from the CSV agent  
  
    """
# Initialize a Chat model (ensure OPENAI_API_KEY is set in environment variables)
llm = ChatOpenAI(temperature=0, model_name="gpt-3.5-turbo")
# Create a CSV agent that can answer questions directly from a CSV file
agent = create_csv_agent(llm, csv_path, verbose=True)
# Run the agent on the given question
answer = agent.run(question)
return answer
# Usage example  
if __name__ == "__main__":
csv_file = "city_data.csv"
# Sample question about cost of living
question1 = "Which city has the highest affordability index?"
result1 = query_city_data(csv_file, question1)
print("Q1:", question1)
print("A1:", result1, "
")
# Sample question about average rent and basket of goods
question2 = "Provide a summary of average rent and basket of goods for all cities."
result2 = query_city_data(csv_file, question2)
print("Q2:", question2)
print("A2:", result2)

# Define a list of 20 comparison questions
questions = [
    "Which city has the highest population?",
    "Which city has the lowest population?",
    "Compare the GDP of the top two cities.",
    "Which city has the largest area?",
    "Which city has the smallest area?",
    "Compare the climate of New York and Los Angeles.",
    "Which city has more landmarks?",
    "Which city has a higher population density?",
    "Compare the average income of San Francisco and Chicago.",
    "Which city has better access to public transportation?",
    "Which city is more suitable for tourists?",
    "Compare the cost of living between Houston and Miami.",
    "Which city has the lowest unemployment rate?",
    "Which city has the most cultural events per year?",
    "Compare crime rates between the largest cities.",
    "Which city offers better healthcare facilities?",
    "Compare the education quality in major cities.",
    "Which city attracts more foreign investment?",
    "Compare environmental sustainability efforts across cities.",
    "Which city would you recommend for moving?"
]

Key Notes:

  • create_csv_agent allows natural language queries directly on CSV datasets.
  • ChatOpenAI (or any LLM supported) interprets queries in context of the CSV data.
  • The example CSV contains fields relevant to city cost analysis: Ranking, Cost of Living, Basket of Goods, Affordability Index, and Average Rent.
  • You can extend this function to handle more complex context-rich questions, e.g., comparing cities, determining affordability thresholds, or generating summary reports.

This approach ensures analysts can perform dynamic, context-aware analysis using LangChain without manually querying CSV rows.

Source(s):

question considerations for city comparison

When using LangChain with a CSVAgent to perform city comparisons, the data you provide will determine the quality and depth of the insights. The CSVAgent can query structured CSV data, so the CSV should include relevant city attributes for meaningful comparisons. Below is a structured guide on key categories of data and design considerations.

1. Demographic Data

City comparisons are often based on population characteristics, such as:

  • Population: total population, population density, urban vs rural distribution
  • Age distribution: % of children, adults, elderly population
  • Ethnicity and diversity indices: optional if available
  • Household size: average family members per household

2. Economic Indicators

Economic data highlights livability and prosperity:

  • Median income or GDP per capita
  • Employment rates or unemployment rate
  • Cost of living indices
  • Property or rental prices

3. Education & Health Metrics

To compare quality of life:

  • Number of schools, colleges, and universities
  • Literacy rate or average education level
  • Healthcare accessibility: hospitals per capita, average hospital rating

4. Infrastructure & Transportation

These factors affect daily life and city efficiency:

  • Public transportation availability: buses, metro, taxis per capita
  • Road density or traffic metrics
  • Internet access and broadband speed

5. Environmental Factors

Environmental attributes help compare sustainability and climate:

  • Air quality / pollution index
  • Green space coverage: parks, forests
  • Average temperature and rainfall

6. Safety and Governance

Safety and governance data can influence livability comparisons:

  • Crime rates: violent crime, property crime
  • Government services: emergency services, municipal quality ratings

7. Other City Attributes

  • Cultural and entertainment options: museums, theaters, events
  • Tourist attractions: if relevant
  • Proximity to other major cities or airports

CSV Structure Tips

  1. Each row represents a city.
  2. Each column represents one attribute or metric.
  3. Include consistent units (e.g., currency in USD, percentages, scores 0–100) for comparisons.
  4. Avoid missing values where possible; fill with averages or null placeholders the agent can handle.

Example CSV Layout

City Population Median Income Crime Rate Schools Parks Avg Temp Public Transport Index
Chicago 2716000 58000 45 450 220 12.3 85
Arlington 76000 70000 20 25 10 11.8 40

Using CSVAgent with LangChain

  1. Load the CSV using the CSVAgent from LangChain.
  2. Prompt it with comparisons, e.g., "Compare Chicago and Arlington Heights in terms of crime rate, cost of living, and public transport."
  3. The agent can return structured summaries, rankings, or insights directly from the CSV.

By including a variety of relevant city metrics and keeping data clean, you'll maximize the value LangChain's CSVAgent can provide in your comparisons.

Source(s):

When using LangChain’s CSVAgent to compare cities, you are essentially automating queries over structured CSV data. To enable meaningful city comparisons, the CSV should contain quantitative and categorical attributes that reflect cost, quality of life, and safety. Based on the aggregated data sources (Numbeo, AreaVibes, BestPlaces, Versus, EIU), the following city attributes are essential:

1. Cost-Related Indices

These allow comparison of affordability and expenses:

  • rentIndex / averageRent: Measures median monthly rental costs for one-bedroom or three-bedroom apartments (city center and outskirts).
  • coworkingCostIndex / officeSpaceCost: Estimates the cost of co-working or commercial workspace, relevant for remote or entrepreneurial workers.
  • costOfLivingIndex: Aggregated metric representing overall daily expense patterns, including groceries, restaurants, utilities, transportation, and services.
  • averageSalary / incomeIndex (optional, for relative affordability): Helps evaluate purchasing power against living costs.

2. Safety and Security

Indices reflecting personal and property safety:

  • safetyIndex / crimeRate / healthSafetyScore: Crime statistics, emergency services quality, and perceived safety levels.
  • emergencyServicesAccess (optional): Proximity and expected response times for police, fire, and medical services.

3. Housing and Accommodation

  • housingAvailability / housingIndex: Median house prices, apartment availability.
  • rentTrends: Historical or projected changes in rental costs.

4. Accessibility and Infrastructure (Optional but Useful)

  • transportIndex / averageCommuteTime: Average travel times and public transit costs.
  • utilitiesCosts: Monthly expenses for water, electricity, heating.

5. Miscellaneous Quality-of-Life Metrics (Optional)

  • healthIndex: Healthcare accessibility and quality.
  • educationIndex: School rankings, universities.
  • amenitiesIndex: Availability of leisure, cultural venues, and coworking spaces.
  • climateIndex: Average temperature, humidity, and extreme conditions if relevant.

Implementation Guidance for CSVAgent

  1. Column Naming: Ensure clarity and consistency. For example, use rentIndex consistently rather than AvgRent in some rows.
  2. Numeric Normalization: Normalize indices if CSV aggregates multiple scales (0-100 vs 0-10).
  3. Optional Metadata: Include city names, country/state columns for contextual queries.
  4. Index Aggregation: If multiple sources contribute to the same index, create a weighted average or note source for transparency.

Minimal Required Set

For a practical city comparison focused on cost and safety, the CSV should minimally contain:

  • cityName
  • rentIndex
  • coworkingCostIndex
  • costOfLivingIndex
  • safetyIndex

Including optional indices enriches analysis but are not strictly necessary for basic comparisons.

Conclusion

To use a CSVAgent effectively in LangChain for city comparison, structure your CSV around financial cost, safety, and housing metrics, with optional expansions for quality of life and accessibility. The most critical columns are: $$ \text{cityName, rentIndex, coworkingCostIndex, costOfLivingIndex, safetyIndex}. $$ These fields allow CSVAgent to perform precise comparative queries, rank cities, and answer user queries on affordability and livability efficiently.

Source(s):

Airbnb analyst agent codespace

as an architect expert develop specification, composable, testable, concise, separation of concerns, app is for digital nomad travelers who are explorers of culture, are into coworking spaces, wifi, remote working, coffee shops, local spots, restaurants, trendy neighborhoods, safe airbnb short term rentals, meets virtual clients, tech savvy, highly educated and capable
core features, value proposition
app offers list of cities, topics of interest such as trendy neighborhoods, affordability/ average prices of airbnb rentals, coffee shops, restaurants, coworking spaces
expert in airbnb travel stays, hotel bookings, travel scenarios, cost of living, business corporate visa laws
compares between cities and neighborhoods to help travelers choose where to invest in for work and leisure, with rankings based on affordability index, cost of living, quality of life, safety, proximity to city center
technical specification: ui ux using nextjs shad cn
agentic ai tools such as langchain orchestration, tavily, supabase pgvector, knowledge base

Below is a concise, architect-level frontend technical specification for the Nomad Explorer (digital-nomad travel + city comparison) app focused on Next.js + shadcn UI, agentic AI orchestration, Supabase pgvector, and separation of concerns. It is designed to be composable, testable, and implementation-ready.


  1. High-level value proposition
  • For tech-savvy digital nomads who evaluate cities for remote work and life: provides quick comparisons (affordability, safety, QoL, proximity to center), actionable local recommendations (coworking, coffee, neighborhoods), visa & business-travel guidance, and Airbnb/hotel analytics so they can pick the best place to live, work, and invest time/money.
  • Differentiators: agentic AI routing to best data source (vector search / LLM / web), city-to-neighborhood comparisons with weighted scoring and interactive tooltips, curated venue cards (coworking / coffee / restaurants), and on-demand visa/legal summaries.
  1. Personas & core user journeys
  • Explorer (short-term, 1–3 months): Browse cities → filter by affordability + wifi → book Airbnb.
  • Settler (6+ months): Compare neighborhoods → evaluate safety, coworking availability, visa pathways → plan relocation.
  • Business Traveler (frequent trips): Check visa/entry rules, airport transfers, proximity to business hubs.
  1. Prioritized MVP features
  • City selector with image buttons (grid / carousel)
  • Topic buttons: coworking, visa, coffee shops, neighborhoods, wifi, transport
  • Chat area for natural language questions (streaming responses)
  • City details page: cost-of-living summary, top neighborhoods, coworking list, wifi & coffee map
  • Compare view: select up to 5 cities, ranking by weighted criteria (affordability, safety, QoL, proximity)
  • Backend orchestrator that chooses:
    • vector search (Supabase pgvector) for factual city data,
    • LangChain agent + web search (SerpAPI / tavily) for current events/visa changes,
    • LLM for synthesis / conversational Q&A.
  • Authentication (Supabase social auth) and secure server-side API keys.
  1. Data model (frontend DTOs / types)
  • City { id, name, country, slug, coordinates, centerLatLng, population?, summary, embeddingsMeta }
  • Neighborhood { id, name, cityId, bbox?, popularityScore, safetyIndex, description }
  • Venue { id, type: 'coworking'|'coffee'|'restaurant'|'hotel', name, address, latlng, priceBand, rating, url }
  • Accommodation { id, type: 'airbnb'|'hotel', nightlyPrice, avgMonthly, hostRating, location }
  • VisaInfo { country, programName, minIncomeUSD, durationMonths, mainRequirements, policyLastUpdated }
  • ComparisonWeights { affordability: number, safety: number, qualityOfLife: number, proximity: number }
  1. Scoring & ranking (affordability index example)
  • AffordabilityIndex(city) = normalized(rentIndex * 0.5 + groceryIndex * 0.2 + transportIndex * 0.1 + coworkingCostIndex * 0.2)
  • FinalScore(city) = sum(weight_i * normalized_metric_i) — adjustable by user.
  • Normalization: min-max or z-score on dataset. Store normalization parameters in backend or compute on the fly.
  1. Frontend architecture & folder mapping (aligns with repo skeleton in app_specification.md)
  • app/
    • layout.tsx (server component, global shell)
    • page.tsx (landing)
    • api/
      • routes.ts (Next.js route handlers / server actions — proxy to orchestrator)
    • city/
      • page.tsx (city list)
      • [slug]/page.tsx (server component: fetch city data)
    • components/
      • ChatArea.tsx (client)
      • CityButton.tsx (client image-button)
      • CityCard.tsx
      • TopicButtons.tsx
      • RankingsPanel.tsx
      • VenueCard.tsx
      • Header.tsx / Footer.tsx / Hero.tsx
    • contexts/
      • tokenLimitContext.tsx
      • CityDataContext.tsx
      • PreferencesContext.tsx
      • AuthContext.tsx
    • hooks/
      • useAgentQuery.ts (client-side orchestrator wrapper)
      • useCityCompare.ts
      • useStreamingResponse.ts
    • utils/
      • cityData.ts
      • ranking.ts (scoring functions)
      • langchainAgent.ts (server-side orchestration helpers)
      • supabaseClient.ts
      • openai.ts / gemini.ts (server-side LLM wrappers)
  1. UI/UX details (shadcn + Tailwind)
  • Use shadcn components + Radix primitives for accessibility (Buttons, Tabs, Dialogs, Popovers, Toggle, Forms).
  • Layout:
    • Left: City selector (collapsible), quick compare panel
    • Center: Chat & content stream (answers, cards, maps, venue carousels)
    • Right: Contextual details (rankings, filters, selected city metrics)
  • City selection: clickable image buttons (rounded cards, alt text, lazy-loading). Selection toggles used for compare.
  • Topic buttons: row of chips (coworking, visa, coffee, neighborhoods, wifi). Clicking triggers a routed query (client or server).
  • Chat area: streaming bubbles; message types: text, cards, list, links, and CTA buttons (e.g., "Compare with Paris").
  • Comparison view: adjustable weight sliders, compact score table, radar chart, and sortable columns.
  1. Data fetching strategy & separation of concerns
  • Use server components for initial page render and SEO (city pages, home).
  • Use client components + React Query / SWR for interactive data (chat streaming, compare updates).
  • All LLM/agent requests executed on server endpoints (no API key exposure). The frontend calls /api/agent or server actions.
  • Vector search: server makes search request to Supabase pgvector and returns top-k results with metadata to frontend (or to LangChain agent).
  • Caching:
    • Short TTL for agent answers (but cache vector search results longer),
    • Cache normalization params & min/max ranges used for ranking.
  1. Orchestration flow (high-level)
  • User selects city or presses a topic button or asks a question.
  • Frontend sends intent+context to /api/agent (POST):
    • payload: { userId, citySlug?, topic?, rawQuery, selectedCities?:[], compareWeights? }
  • Backend orchestrator (LangChainjs):
    • If query appears factual + vector data exists → run pgvector similarity (Supabase), synthesize with LLM (few-shot).
    • If query is news/time-sensitive or visa policy → run web tool (SerpAPI / tavily) then LLM for summarization.
    • If open-ended or planning style → LLM chain with external toolchain (bookings API, price aggregators).
  • Streaming: server streams tokens to frontend via SSE / fetch streaming for smooth UX.
  • Include tool-use log metadata for auditing (which tool answered what).
  1. Integrations & infra (concise)
  • Embeddings & vectordb: Supabase Postgres + pgvector, embedding generation offloaded to backend data pipeline (OpenRouter / OpenAI embeddings).
  • LLMs: OpenAI / Gemini / OpenRouter; wrap calls in server-side adapters and use LangChain for orchestration.
  • Web search tool: SerpAPI or tavily (as a LangChain tool).
  • Auth: Supabase social auth for sign-in; use server sessions for secure LLM usage.
  • Persistence: Supabase for city metadata, users, query history, and embeddings table.
  1. Security & operational
  • Keep all API keys in server env (.env), never sent to client.
  • Rate-limit agent endpoints, require auth for heavy operations.
  • Input validation & sanitization on server.
  • Monitoring: Sentry for exceptions, Prometheus-style metrics for usage.
  1. Testing strategy
  • Component unit tests: React Testing Library + Vitest/Jest.
    • Test TopicButtons interactions, CityButton rendering, RankingsPanel calculations with mocked props.
  • Hook/unit tests: test scoring functions (ranking.ts) deterministically with sample fixtures.
  • API contract tests: mock Supabase/LLM (msw) and validate /api/agent behavior and error paths.
  • Integration tests: Playwright for flows: select cities, open chat, get streaming answer, compare scoring.
  • E2E: Playwright / Cypress to validate auth + booking/navigation flows.
  • CI: run unit tests + lint + typecheck on PR; optional snapshot tests for critical UIs.
  1. Observability & UX telemetry
  • Track feature usage: which topics clicked, most-compared cities, average weights selected.
  • Log tool provenance for each answer (vector vs web vs LLM) for transparency in UI.
  1. Developer ergonomics & separation of concerns
  • Keep components dumb: presentational + callback props. Move data fetching to hooks.
  • Keep orchestration on server side only. Frontend only posts user intent and renders responses.
  • Build small, composable pieces: CityCard + VenueCard + RankingsPanel → reusable across pages.
  • Strict typing (TypeScript) for all DTOs across frontend and server.
  1. Example weight-driven comparison algorithm (summary)
  • Input: selectedCities[], metrics for each (rent, coworkingPrice, safetyIndex, distanceToCenter)
  • Normalize each metric across selectedCities
  • Weighted sum per city with user-specified weights
  • Sort and present top N and breakdown per metric for transparency

Example front-end component (Topic buttons) — composable, testable, accessible:

import React from "react";

export type Topic = "coworking" | "visa" | "coffee" | "neighborhoods" | "wifi" | "accommodation";

type TopicButtonsProps = {
  topics?: Topic[];
  onSelect: (topic: Topic) => void;
  active?: Topic | null;
};

export const TopicButtons: React.FC<TopicButtonsProps> = ({ topics = ["coworking","visa","coffee","neighborhoods","wifi","accommodation"], onSelect, active = null }) => {
  return (
    <div className="flex gap-2 flex-wrap" role="toolbar" aria-label="Topics">
      {topics.map((t) => (
        <button
          key={t}
          type="button"
          aria-pressed={active === t}
          onClick={() => onSelect(t)}
          className={`px-3 py-1 rounded-md text-sm transition ${
            active === t ? "bg-primary text-white" : "bg-muted text-foreground hover:shadow"
          }`}
        >
          {t.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + t.slice(1)}
        </button>
      ))}
    </div>
  );
};

export default TopicButtons;
  1. Example scoring util (extract — testable unit)
export type CityMetrics = {
  slug: string;
  rentIndex: number; // lower is better
  coworkingCostIndex: number;
  safetyIndex: number; // higher is better
  proximityIndex: number; // lower is better
  qualityOfLifeIndex: number; // higher is better
};

export type Weights = {
  affordability: number;
  coworking: number;
  safety: number;
  proximity: number;
  qualityOfLife: number;
};

export function normalize(values: number[]) {
  const min = Math.min(...values);
  const max = Math.max(...values);
  if (max === min) return values.map(() => 0.5);
  return values.map((v) => (v - min) / (max - min));
}

export function computeScores(cities: CityMetrics[], weights: Weights) {
  const rents = normalize(cities.map((c) => c.rentIndex));
  const coworkings = normalize(cities.map((c) => c.coworkingCostIndex));
  const safeties = normalize(cities.map((c) => -c.safetyIndex)); // invert since higher is better; we'll flip later
  const proximities = normalize(cities.map((c) => c.proximityIndex));
  const qol = normalize(cities.map((c) => -c.qualityOfLifeIndex));

  return cities.map((c, idx) => {
    const score =
      (1 - rents[idx]) * weights.affordability +
      (1 - coworkings[idx]) * weights.coworking +
      safeties[idx] * weights.safety +
      (1 - proximities[idx]) * weights.proximity +
      qol[idx] * weights.qualityOfLife;
    return { slug: c.slug, score };
  }).sort((a,b)=> b.score - a.score);
}
  1. Example API contract for /api/agent (server)
  • POST /api/agent
    • Request body: { userId?, citySlug?, selectedCities?:string[], topic?:string, query:string, compareWeights?:Weights }
    • Response: streaming answer tokens + metadata: { type: 'text'|'cards'|'venueList', tool: 'vector'|'web'|'llm', provenance: [...ids], suggestedActions: [...] }
  1. Implementation notes / next steps
  • Implement supabase embedding + pgvector schema and ingestion pipeline (weekly updates as spec recommends).
  • Build server-side LangChain agent wrapper that accepts toolchain config and returns streaming responses.
  • Build lightweight front-end chat streaming component (use ReadableStream + incremental rendering).
  • Create a small seed dataset for the ten example cities for development and unit tests using cost_of_living.md data.

If you want, I can:

  • generate the API route skeleton /app/api/routes.ts that the frontend will call,
  • scaffold the ChatArea component (streaming),
  • or produce the Supabase table schemas and example SQL for pgvector.

Which of those would you like me to produce next?

ranking specs

implement ranking logic function to ensure city does not have proximity index but neighborhoods of selected city has all scores plus proximity score, main page shows overall metrics
/**
 * Ranking utilities for Nomad Explorer
 *
 * Goal:
 * - Cities may NOT have a proximityIndex, but neighborhoods for a selected city DO have full metrics
 * - Aggregate neighborhood metrics to produce city-level metrics where needed (including proximity)
 * - Normalize metrics across the candidate set, compute weighted score, and return breakdowns
 *
 * Design/assumptions:
 * - Metrics where a LOWER value is better (costs, proximity) are treated as "lower-is-better":
 *     rentIndex, coworkingCostIndex, proximityIndex
 * - Metrics where a HIGHER value is better:
 *     safetyIndex, qualityOfLifeIndex
 * - Neighborhood aggregation uses a simple average, optionally weighted by `popularityScore` if present.
 * - Normalization uses min-max across the input set. If all values equal, normalized value = 0.5.
 * - Final score is computed as weighted sum of per-metric contributions. Contributions are calculated
 *   so that higher contribution is better (0..1). For "lower-is-better" metrics we invert after normalization.
 *
 * This file is intentionally small, strongly typed, and unit-test friendly.
 */

export type CityInput = {
  slug: string;
  name?: string;
  // city-level raw metrics; any can be undefined (especially proximityIndex)
  rentIndex?: number; // lower is better
  coworkingCostIndex?: number; // lower is better
  safetyIndex?: number; // higher is better
  qualityOfLifeIndex?: number; // higher is better
  proximityIndex?: number | undefined; // lower is better - may be missing
};

export type NeighborhoodMetrics = {
  id: string;
  name?: string;
  rentIndex: number;
  coworkingCostIndex: number;
  safetyIndex: number;
  qualityOfLifeIndex: number;
  proximityIndex: number; // distance or time to city center in normalized units (lower is better)
  popularityScore?: number; // optional weight for averaging (0..1)
};

export type Weights = {
  affordability: number; // maps to rentIndex primarily
  coworking: number;
  safety: number;
  proximity: number;
  qualityOfLife: number;
};

export type AggregatedCityMetrics = {
  slug: string;
  name?: string;
  rentIndex: number;
  coworkingCostIndex: number;
  safetyIndex: number;
  qualityOfLifeIndex: number;
  proximityIndex: number;
  // metadata
  derivedFromNeighborhoods?: boolean;
  neighborhoodCount?: number;
};

export type ScoredCity = {
  slug: string;
  name?: string;
  score: number;
  rank?: number;
  raw: AggregatedCityMetrics;
  normalized: {
    rent: number; // 0..1 where higher is better for contribution (so inverted for lower-is-better)
    coworking: number;
    safety: number;
    proximity: number;
    qualityOfLife: number;
  };
  contributions: {
    affordability: number;
    coworking: number;
    safety: number;
    proximity: number;
    qualityOfLife: number;
  };
};

/** Default weights (can be overridden by user) */
export const DEFAULT_WEIGHTS: Weights = {
  affordability: 0.35,
  coworking: 0.15,
  safety: 0.2,
  proximity: 0.15,
  qualityOfLife: 0.15,
};

/** Safe numeric helpers */
function isFiniteNumber(n: any): n is number {
  return typeof n === "number" && Number.isFinite(n);
}

function avg(values: number[]): number {
  if (!values.length) return 0;
  return values.reduce((s, v) => s + v, 0) / values.length;
}

function weightedAvg(values: number[], weights: number[]): number {
  if (!values.length) return 0;
  const wsum = weights.reduce((s, w) => s + w, 0);
  if (wsum === 0) return avg(values);
  let total = 0;
  for (let i = 0; i < values.length; i++) {
    total += values[i] * (weights[i] ?? 0);
  }
  return total / wsum;
}

/**
 * Aggregate neighborhoods to a city-level metric set.
 * If popularityScore exists on neighborhoods it'll be used as a weight; otherwise equal weight.
 */
export function aggregateFromNeighborhoods(
  slug: string,
  cityName: string | undefined,
  neighborhoods: NeighborhoodMetrics[]
): AggregatedCityMetrics {
  if (!neighborhoods || neighborhoods.length === 0) {
    // fallback to neutral defaults if no neighborhoods are provided
    return {
      slug,
      name: cityName,
      rentIndex: 1,
      coworkingCostIndex: 1,
      safetyIndex: 0.5,
      qualityOfLifeIndex: 0.5,
      proximityIndex: 1,
      derivedFromNeighborhoods: false,
      neighborhoodCount: 0,
    };
  }

  // Build arrays and weights
  const rents: number[] = [];
  const cowCosts: number[] = [];
  const safeties: number[] = [];
  const qols: number[] = [];
  const proximities: number[] = [];
  const weights: number[] = [];

  for (const n of neighborhoods) {
    rents.push(n.rentIndex);
    cowCosts.push(n.coworkingCostIndex);
    safeties.push(n.safetyIndex);
    qols.push(n.qualityOfLifeIndex);
    proximities.push(n.proximityIndex);
    weights.push(isFiniteNumber(n.popularityScore) ? n.popularityScore! : 1);
  }

  const rentIndex = weightedAvg(rents, weights);
  const coworkingCostIndex = weightedAvg(cowCosts, weights);
  const safetyIndex = weightedAvg(safeties, weights);
  const qualityOfLifeIndex = weightedAvg(qols, weights);
  const proximityIndex = weightedAvg(proximities, weights);

  return {
    slug,
    name: cityName,
    rentIndex,
    coworkingCostIndex,
    safetyIndex,
    qualityOfLifeIndex,
    proximityIndex,
    derivedFromNeighborhoods: true,
    neighborhoodCount: neighborhoods.length,
  };
}

/**
 * Normalize an array of numbers using min-max normalization.
 * Returns array of normalized values (0..1). If all values equal, returns 0.5 for each entry.
 */
export function minMaxNormalize(values: number[]): number[] {
  if (!values.length) return [];
  const min = Math.min(...values);
  const max = Math.max(...values);
  if (max === min) return values.map(() => 0.5);
  return values.map((v) => (v - min) / (max - min));
}

/**
 * Compute scores for a set of cities.
 *
 * Parameters:
 * - cities: CityInput[] - city-level inputs (may not include proximityIndex)
 * - neighborhoodsMap: Record<citySlug, NeighborhoodMetrics[]> - optional neighborhoods keyed by city slug
 * - weights: Weights - importance weights for each dimension
 *
 * Returns ScoredCity[] sorted by descending score and annotated with rank and breakdown.
 */
export function computeCityRankings(
  cities: CityInput[],
  neighborhoodsMap: Record<string, NeighborhoodMetrics[]> = {},
  weights: Weights = DEFAULT_WEIGHTS
): ScoredCity[] {
  // First, produce aggregated city metrics ensuring proximityIndex exists (either city-level or aggregated)
  const aggregated: AggregatedCityMetrics[] = cities.map((c) => {
    const cityNeighborhoods = neighborhoodsMap[c.slug] ?? [];
    if (!isFiniteNumber(c.proximityIndex) && cityNeighborhoods.length > 0) {
      // derive from neighborhoods
      return aggregateFromNeighborhoods(c.slug, c.name, cityNeighborhoods);
    }
    // Use city-level values where provided, otherwise fall back to neighborhood aggregation or defaults
    if (cityNeighborhoods.length > 0) {
      const agg = aggregateFromNeighborhoods(c.slug, c.name, cityNeighborhoods);
      // prefer city values when present, but fill missing ones from agg
      return {
        slug: c.slug,
        name: c.name,
        rentIndex: isFiniteNumber(c.rentIndex) ? c.rentIndex! : agg.rentIndex,
        coworkingCostIndex: isFiniteNumber(c.coworkingCostIndex)
          ? c.coworkingCostIndex!
          : agg.coworkingCostIndex,
        safetyIndex: isFiniteNumber(c.safetyIndex) ? c.safetyIndex! : agg.safetyIndex,
        qualityOfLifeIndex: isFiniteNumber(c.qualityOfLifeIndex)
          ? c.qualityOfLifeIndex!
          : agg.qualityOfLifeIndex,
        proximityIndex: isFiniteNumber(c.proximityIndex) ? c.proximityIndex! : agg.proximityIndex,
        derivedFromNeighborhoods: !isFiniteNumber(c.proximityIndex),
        neighborhoodCount: agg.neighborhoodCount,
      };
    }
    // No neighborhoods; use city values with defaults for missing metrics
    return {
      slug: c.slug,
      name: c.name,
      rentIndex: isFiniteNumber(c.rentIndex) ? c.rentIndex! : 1,
      coworkingCostIndex: isFiniteNumber(c.coworkingCostIndex) ? c.coworkingCostIndex! : 1,
      safetyIndex: isFiniteNumber(c.safetyIndex) ? c.safetyIndex! : 0.5,
      qualityOfLifeIndex: isFiniteNumber(c.qualityOfLifeIndex) ? c.qualityOfLifeIndex! : 0.5,
      proximityIndex: isFiniteNumber(c.proximityIndex) ? c.proximityIndex! : 1,
      derivedFromNeighborhoods: false,
      neighborhoodCount: 0,
    };
  });

  // Build arrays for normalization. Note: for "lower-is-better" metrics we normalize as-is then invert when computing contributions.
  const rentArr = aggregated.map((a) => a.rentIndex);
  const coworkingArr = aggregated.map((a) => a.coworkingCostIndex);
  const safetyArr = aggregated.map((a) => a.safetyIndex);
  const proximityArr = aggregated.map((a) => a.proximityIndex);
  const qolArr = aggregated.map((a) => a.qualityOfLifeIndex);

  const normRent = minMaxNormalize(rentArr);
  const normCow = minMaxNormalize(coworkingArr);
  const normSafety = minMaxNormalize(safetyArr);
  const normProx = minMaxNormalize(proximityArr);
  const normQol = minMaxNormalize(qolArr);

  // For lower-is-better (rent, coworking, proximity) contributions we invert normalized value as (1 - norm)
  const scored: ScoredCity[] = aggregated.map((a, idx) => {
    const rentContribution = 1 - normRent[idx]; // higher is better
    const cowContribution = 1 - normCow[idx];
    const proxContribution = 1 - normProx[idx];
    const safetyContribution = normSafety[idx]; // already higher-is-better
    const qolContribution = normQol[idx];

    // Weighted sum
    const score =
      rentContribution * weights.affordability +
      cowContribution * weights.coworking +
      safetyContribution * weights.safety +
      proxContribution * weights.proximity +
      qolContribution * weights.qualityOfLife;

    return {
      slug: a.slug,
      name: a.name,
      score,
      raw: a,
      normalized: {
        rent: rentContribution,
        coworking: cowContribution,
        safety: safetyContribution,
        proximity: proxContribution,
        qualityOfLife: qolContribution,
      },
      contributions: {
        affordability: rentContribution * weights.affordability,
        coworking: cowContribution * weights.coworking,
        safety: safetyContribution * weights.safety,
        proximity: proxContribution * weights.proximity,
        qualityOfLife: qolContribution * weights.qualityOfLife,
      },
    };
  });

  // Sort descending and assign rank
  scored.sort((a, b) => b.score - a.score);
  scored.forEach((s, i) => (s.rank = i + 1));

  return scored;
}

/**
 * Example usage:
 *
 * const cities: CityInput[] = [
 *   { slug: "lisbon", name: "Lisbon", rentIndex: 0.6, safetyIndex: 0.7, qualityOfLifeIndex: 0.75 },
 *   { slug: "paris", name: "Paris", rentIndex: 0.9, safetyIndex: 0.6, qualityOfLifeIndex: 0.8 },
 * ];
 *
 * const neighborhoodsMap = {
 *   lisbon: [
 *     { id: "alfama", rentIndex: 0.55, coworkingCostIndex: 0.4, safetyIndex: 0.7, qualityOfLifeIndex: 0.75, proximityIndex: 0.3, popularityScore: 0.8 },
 *     { id: "bairro_alto", rentIndex: 0.65, coworkingCostIndex: 0.5, safetyIndex: 0.65, qualityOfLifeIndex: 0.7, proximityIndex: 0.2, popularityScore: 0.6 },
 *   ],
 * };
 *
 * const rankings = computeCityRankings(cities, neighborhoodsMap);
 *
 * - The function will aggregate Lisbon from neighborhoods (including proximity),
 *   use Paris city-level proximity (or fallback), normalize across the set, and return scores + contributions.
 */
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment