.NET project structure

dotnetlayout.md

$/
  artifacts/
  build/
  docs/
  lib/
  packages/
  samples/
  src/
  tests/
  .editorconfig
  .gitignore
  .gitattributes
  build.cmd
  build.sh
  LICENSE
  NuGet.Config
  README.md
  {solution}.sln

• src - Main projects (the product code)
• tests - Test projects
• docs - Documentation stuff, markdown files, help files etc.
• samples (optional) - Sample projects
• lib - Things that can NEVER exist in a nuget package
• artifacts - Build outputs go here. Doing a build.cmd/build.sh generates artifacts here (nupkgs, dlls, pdbs, etc.)
• packages - NuGet packages
• build - Build customizations (custom msbuild files/psake/fake/albacore/etc) scripts
• build.cmd - Bootstrap the build for windows
• build.sh - Bootstrap the build for *nix
• global.json - ASP.NET vNext only

.gitignore

[Oo]bj/
[Bb]in/
.nuget/
_ReSharper.*
packages/
artifacts/
*.user
*.suo
*.userprefs
*DS_Store
*.sln.ide

There's probably more things that go in the ignore file.

• Update: Added docs folder
• Added README.md and LICENSE - Critical if you're OSS, if not ignore it
• Renamed test to tests
• Added lib for things that CANNOT exist in nuget packages
• Removed NuGet.config for people using packet :)
• Added global.json for ASP.NET vnext
• Added .editorconfig file in the root (x-plat IDE settings)
• Added NuGet.config back because people were confused about it missing

@davidfowl
Hello David.
Where would you recommend putting a self-signed ROOT certificate that gets added to docker images in local development only? Would that go under build or something else?

Thank you.

@davidfowl
Where would you recommend putting a self-signed ROOT certificate that gets added to docker images in local development only? Would that go under build or something else?

I would not put them in GIT, and GitHub may even block them. Instead, create a powershell script to create and register the cert and place it's path in an environment variable, then have the Dockerfile get the file path from the environment.

@davidfowl
Where would you recommend putting a self-signed ROOT certificate that gets added to docker images in local development only? Would that go under build or something else?

I would not put them in GIT, and GitHub may even block them. Instead, create a powershell script to create and register the cert and place it's path in an environment variable, then have the Dockerfile get the file path from the environment.

Hello sharpninja,
I appreciate the response, but I am not sure this would work. This cert gets added to each image by using a dockerfile.dev and then the docker.compose file builds that docker dev file during local development only. So it uses a COPY instruction to copy the certificate into the image and a RUN instruction to run update-ca-certificates on the Debian Linux used by the container. As far as I know, you can't do this with PowerShell. Also, as far as I know, you can't use COPY with files outside of the docker build context, so you can't use files outside the directory where the docker files are.

I could not find a better way of getting a self-signed certificate into a docker image, so the certificate is included in the Solution (it's a public only side, no private key, so I don't mind putting into a Git repo).

Thank you.

As far as I know, you can't do this with PowerShell.

There is quit literally nothing you cannot do with PowerShell. Read about New-SelfSignedCertificate which generates a cert you can keep locally and include in your Dockerfile.

Hi, I created a tool to automate this process https://github.com/gigi81/dotnet-newrepo/
It doesn't include everything mentioned here but most of it is there. I would appreciate anyone taking the time to try it and give some feedback. In short here is how to use it (more details on the readme of the project):

dotnet tool install dotnet-newrepo --global

#first create a directory host your repo
mkdir Organization.Project
cd Organization.Project
#then create the init.yml file (this file is used to specify a few settings like your github username/repo)
newrepo init
#customize the init.yml file with your custom settings
notepad init.yml
#then finally create the repo
newrepo

@davidfowl - Curious if you still consider this current or if there are some lessons learned since it was created.

I created a .NET CLI tool for this => https://github.com/MCCshreyas/Project

how do you organize src folder?

By dragging files and folders around until you are happy.

This is a great starting point, thanks!

For generating the gitignore file, you can always use the dotnet CLI as follows;

dotnet new gitignore

Also, I think we should pretend batch scripts never existed and always assume that it will be a PowerShell script build.ps1 that starts the build 😄 PowerShell is a significantly more robust scripting language and well worth knowing IMHO.

I think it also would be good to clarify whether sub-directories should be present in src and tests if there's only one project. For example, dotnet-format places the project at the root of src and tests directories which may be appropriate if only one project is present, but is this a good approach?

Huge thanks for the gist 😄
Fotis

Can someone help me understand this? What is an example of:
"lib - Things that can NEVER exist in a nuget package"?
I thought I could build a nuget package to hold anything?

Hi @davidfowl thanks for sharing. Where would you put pipeline-related files? (e.g. azure-pipelines.yaml, resource-group.bicep, etc.)

Hi @davidfowl thanks for sharing. Where would you put pipeline-related files? (e.g. azure-pipelines.yaml, resource-group.bicep, etc.)

Sorry not David but a tip:

• we put pipelines in /build (yaml pipes)
• we put IaC (.bicep) in a folder named /infra

I have a further thought too. I realise I'm in the absolute minority here, but I find it odd that we shorten source to src and libraries to lib yet there's no good reason to do this and we don't do this for any other folder. This really feels more historical than logical to me personally and doesn't make my OCD happy 😄

As such, I'm personally using source as my source folder ... does that make me a bit of an outcast? 😨

I personally put my azure-pipelines.yaml in the root folder but agree that it probably would be better in the build directory.

Hi @davidfowl thanks for sharing. Where would you put pipeline-related files? (e.g. azure-pipelines.yaml, resource-group.bicep, etc.)

Sorry not David but a tip:

• we put pipelines in /build (yaml pipes)
• we put IaC (.bicep) in a folder named /infra

👍

If your git repository also contains the frontend that consumes the dotnet API, where would you put the front code? The application code in /src and the tests code in /tests ?

If your git repository also contains the frontend that consumes the dotnet API, where would you put the front code? The application code in /src and the tests code in /tests ?

Sorry not David again but an opinion:
1: keep it in a separate repo
2: if #1 not possible --> create folders below src: src/backend + src/frontend

Just a matter of preference of course, but since all ci-cd related files are used in an Azure/Azure DevOps context, I've started having a preference to putting yaml and bicep files in a folder called .azuredevops

I got the idea from GitHub actions' default root folder (.github)

If your git repository also contains the frontend that consumes the dotnet API, where would you put the front code? The application code in /src and the tests code in /tests ?

Sorry not David again but an opinion: 1: keep it in a separate repo 2: if #1 not possible --> create folders below src: src/backend + src/frontend

src/projectname.api and src/projectName.Front is what I did. But it felt weird to do the same for tests : tests/projectName.api.Tests tests/projectName.Front.Test

Just a matter of preference of course, but since all ci-cd related files are used in an Azure/Azure DevOps context, I've started having a preference to putting yaml and bicep files in a folder called .azuredevops

I got the idea from GitHub actions' default root folder (.github)

@fvilches17 I understand your point, but I am personally not a big fan of using dot folders that are platform specific. You are right, that's how github does it and if your ci-cd related files are only used in an Azure/Azure DevOps context, maybe it makes sense in your context.
However, I think that infrastructure files, ci files, or cd files should not be stored in a folder dependent on the platform (even if for github they don't really let you the choice).

Because maybe someday you will migrate from Azure DevOps to another platform, your application could be multi-cloud (with some resources in one cloud, and other in another) or even if it's an azure only application it coud use specific services (authentication, monitoring ...) outside Azure. Moreover, CI/CD files could contain other files than the Azure pipelines YAML files like scripts, configuration files, or even code files. That's why I prefer using an "infra" folder, a "build" or "pipelines" folder .... By the way, by default Azure Developer CLI (preview) uses an infra folder.

If your git repository also contains the frontend that consumes the dotnet API, where would you put the front code? The application code in /src and the tests code in /tests ?

If UI and backend are worked on by the same team/organisation, they are the same app, and they should be versioned together (i.e. in the same repo) and deployed together.

If your git repository also contains the frontend that consumes the dotnet API, where would you put the front code? The application code in /src and the tests code in /tests ?

If UI and backend are worked on by the same team/organisation, they are the same app, and they should be versioned together (i.e. in the same repo) and deployed together.

I agree, I was just wondering what it means for the folder organization.

Soz, I think I meant to reply to a reply

…

On Mon, 7 Nov 2022, 12:52 Alexandre Nédélec, ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this gist. ------------------------------ If your git repository also contains the frontend that consumes the dotnet API, where would you put the front code? The application code in /src and the tests code in /tests ? If UI and backend are worked on by the same team/organisation, they are the same app, and they should be versioned together (i.e. in the same repo) and deployed together. I agree, I was just wondering what it means for the folder organization. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://gist.github.com/ed7564297c61fe9ab814#gistcomment-4360994> or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACDJ6VUJMOXRHPECBI42SDWHD3QLBFKMF2HI4TJMJ2XIZLTSKBKK5TBNR2WLJDHNFZXJJDOMFWWLK3UNBZGKYLEL52HS4DFQKSXMYLMOVS2I5DSOVS2I3TBNVS3W5DIOJSWCZC7OBQXE5DJMNUXAYLOORPWCY3UNF3GS5DZVRZXKYTKMVRXIX3UPFYGLK2HNFZXIQ3PNVWWK3TUUZ2G64DJMNZZDAVEOR4XAZNEM5UXG5FFOZQWY5LFVAYTKNBZGE3DQNFHORZGSZ3HMVZKMY3SMVQXIZI> . You are receiving this email because you commented on a thread. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub> .

thought I'd share,

this is the structure I follow for some projects. you can imagine that at root, besides the .azuredevops folder, there's src, test etc. folders

the name .azuredevops was chosen because back in Azure DevOps when you place a pull_request_template.md file in a folder with set name, then the repo's PR descriptions use the content of that file, pretty much used like a template for PR descriptions

however, the name can be anything of course. e.g. something generic like .devops

This thread makes me think there are several intents within the discussion. Is @davidfowl 's intent to outline a dotnet project for a monorepo, for deployment to custom infrastructure, for delivery of a package, etc.?

This thread makes me think there are several intents within the discussion. Is @davidfowl 's intent to outline a dotnet project for a monorepo, for deployment to custom infrastructure, for delivery of a package, etc.?

My 2 cents:

I follow this structure when I'm not building a monorepo.

When I do build a monorepo, I wrap this structure in another set of folders at the root of the repository (one for each service, library, or app). But I might keep a few things like shared build pipelines, docs, and editorconfig in the root.

@sharpninja @tiny-dancer I've created https://github.com/dotnet-template/project-layout, feel free to fork it and maybe contribute to it.

Could someone please explain to me the difference between putting nupkgs in the artefacts directory vs the packages directory?

My understanding is the Artefacts is the output of your project, much could include NuGet packages, packages directory contains your projects dependencies.

Ahhh OK. For when a packages.config is being used. Not applicable to me and I think I was tunnel visioning past it.

Thanks, @Layoric

@D3MaxT
Never distribute [the same] private cert to multiple distinct clients, even if you do it securely - you might as well drop encryption altogether.
For self signed certificates just generate them on the client machine.