Choosing between RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) and fine-tuning depends on your use case, data type, infrastructure, and latency/accuracy needs. This guide helps you understand when to use each technique.
You change the model itself.
- Specialized tone, domain, or logic: e.g., legal, medical, or customer service with unique jargon or response styles.
- Consistent and controlled outputs: e.g., structured responses, classification, or generation following strict formats.
- Offline or edge usage: where external lookups (APIs/dbs) aren't possible.
- Low-latency, high-volume applications: inference is faster after fine-tuning (vs retrieving and reranking documents).
- Computationally expensive (GPU-intensive).
- Needs retraining for updates (not dynamic).
- Risk of catastrophic forgetting if not done properly.
You keep the model static, and inject external knowledge at inference time.
- Dynamic knowledge: e.g., FAQs, product info, or fast-changing data (support bots, search).
- Long context retrieval: handle large corpora without needing it "baked" into the model.
- Fewer resources: no need to retrain models, just update the database or vector index.
- Explainability: you can cite sources (good for legal/medical use cases).
- Higher latency (retrieval + generation).
- Needs a solid retrieval pipeline (embedding model, vector store, reranking).
- Limited by context window (injectable content).
Feature | Fine-Tuning | RAG |
---|---|---|
Knowledge Update | Static (retrain) | Dynamic (just update data) |
Accuracy on niche data | ✅ High | |
Resource cost | High (GPUs needed) | Low-Medium (CPU OK) |
Explainability | ❌ Low | ✅ High |
Development time | Longer | Faster |
Model behavior change | Permanent | Temporary (context-based) |
Use Case | RAG | Fine-Tune |
---|---|---|
Legal search assistant | ✅ | |
Support chatbot | ✅ | ✅ (if tone/flow matter) |
Medical diagnosis | ✅ | |
Resume/CV fixer | ✅ | ✅ |
Programming Q&A bot | ✅ | ❌ |
Use fine-tuning when you want to deeply specialize a model's behavior, tone, or logic. Use RAG when you need flexible, dynamic access to external knowledge with less overhead. In many cases, combining both can yield the best results.