Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@decagondev
Created April 22, 2025 15:17
Show Gist options
  • Save decagondev/5f3c7cf4548798e0a9d55f58e1f073d7 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save decagondev/5f3c7cf4548798e0a9d55f58e1f073d7 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

🧠 Fine-Tuning vs RAG: When to Use Each

Overview

Choosing between RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) and fine-tuning depends on your use case, data type, infrastructure, and latency/accuracy needs. This guide helps you understand when to use each technique.


🧠 When to Use Fine-Tuning

You change the model itself.

✅ Best for:

  • Specialized tone, domain, or logic: e.g., legal, medical, or customer service with unique jargon or response styles.
  • Consistent and controlled outputs: e.g., structured responses, classification, or generation following strict formats.
  • Offline or edge usage: where external lookups (APIs/dbs) aren't possible.
  • Low-latency, high-volume applications: inference is faster after fine-tuning (vs retrieving and reranking documents).

❗️Tradeoffs:

  • Computationally expensive (GPU-intensive).
  • Needs retraining for updates (not dynamic).
  • Risk of catastrophic forgetting if not done properly.

🔍 When to Use RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)

You keep the model static, and inject external knowledge at inference time.

✅ Best for:

  • Dynamic knowledge: e.g., FAQs, product info, or fast-changing data (support bots, search).
  • Long context retrieval: handle large corpora without needing it "baked" into the model.
  • Fewer resources: no need to retrain models, just update the database or vector index.
  • Explainability: you can cite sources (good for legal/medical use cases).

❗️Tradeoffs:

  • Higher latency (retrieval + generation).
  • Needs a solid retrieval pipeline (embedding model, vector store, reranking).
  • Limited by context window (injectable content).

⚔️ RAG vs Fine-Tuning: Quick Comparison

Feature Fine-Tuning RAG
Knowledge Update Static (retrain) Dynamic (just update data)
Accuracy on niche data ✅ High ⚠️ Medium
Resource cost High (GPUs needed) Low-Medium (CPU OK)
Explainability ❌ Low ✅ High
Development time Longer Faster
Model behavior change Permanent Temporary (context-based)

🚀 Real-World Examples

Use Case RAG Fine-Tune
Legal search assistant ⚠️ (if tone is needed)
Support chatbot ✅ (if tone/flow matter)
Medical diagnosis ⚠️
Resume/CV fixer
Programming Q&A bot

Summary

Use fine-tuning when you want to deeply specialize a model's behavior, tone, or logic. Use RAG when you need flexible, dynamic access to external knowledge with less overhead. In many cases, combining both can yield the best results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment