gistfile1.md

Which tweet are you more likely to click on?

1. Check out this funny video about cats: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IytNBm8WA1c

2. Check out this funny video about cats: http://bit.ly/hrbuTl

3. Check this out! http://bj6.fi.gd/funny/cats/video

@RobertDoroftei There is no such thing as "safe for everyone". For example, I wouldn't be shocked at extreme furry porn. However, I would be shocked by people failing to understand the distributed the nature of the internet and pushing for centralized infrastructures such as thelastshorteneryoulleverneed.com - well, what do you know. Also, this is not about simplifying life. Being in a brainwave factory, being fed uniform foodpaste via tubes would simplify a lot of lives - this doesn't mean it is desirable. On the same subject, read "Why I do not want to work at Google", a piece by Kragen Javier Sitaker: http://lists.canonical.org/pipermail/kragen-tol/2011-August/000938.html On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:12 AM, RobertDoroftei [email protected] wrote:

@nddrylliog wouldn't it be great to have some sort of authority: safeurl.com or something like that, that will be the place where to create a URL to share that will automatically check the URL for unwanted content and when people would see safeurl.com/?the_url everybody will know that the URL is verified by a higher authority and it is safe to click on ? that would simplify life for everyone On Aug 29, 2011, at 12:07 AM, nddrylliog wrote: > _sigh_ > > @RobertDoroftei if it's *.google.com then, yes, technically-aware > people will know it has to be googley somehow. HOWEVER, it's entirely > possible that non-technical people will consider 9sad8f.google.com > untrustworthy, considering they have no idea why stuff is separated by > dots anyway, and why order matters. People are much more likely to > ignore stuff on the right than on the left. > > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:04 PM, RobertDoroftei > ***@***.*** > wrote: > > > @nddrylliog > > > > this is not about scam, if you see 9sad8f.google.com/whatever/you/want/here probably you'll just ignore the whole string at the beginning, if the domain has weight then people are just taking for granted that it's not some trick to get into a scam of some sort. > > ## > > > > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > > https://gist.github.com/1176791 > ## > > Amos Wenger > Crafting the future of Web Audio at ofmlabs.org > I'm @nddrylliog on GitHub > ## > > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://gist.github.com/1176791 ## Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://gist.github.com/1176791

## Amos Wenger Crafting the future of Web Audio at ofmlabs.org I'm @nddrylliog on GitHub