Testing private functionality in JavaScript
9 JUL 2013
Start with this example, modified from http://philipwalton.com/articles/how-to-unit-test-private-functions-in-javascript/ by @philwalton
var myModule = (function() {
function foo() {
// private function `foo` inside closure
return "foo"
}
return {
bar: function() {
// use private foo
foo()
// public function `bar` returned from closure
return "bar"
}
}
}())
Testing function bar is straightforward: the call to myModule() should return the string 'bar' in this case.
But how do we test that the internal function foo behaves correctly, given that it is hidden in a closure?
Take the tests for foo and bar in separate stages:
- Since foo is a dependency for
bar, we need to testfoofirst. - Whether or not
foois to be private, we should testfoofirst as a public api. - If
foois to be private, then it shouldn't do too much. That will keep the tests short. - However, if
foodoes a lot, then it shouldn't be private. - Once you're satisfied with the
footests, hide foo in the closure. - Then ask, how does
barusefoo? justfoo(x)orreturn foo(x)? what gets passed to it? does it get modified? - And once you've answered that, you can let or make
bartestfoofor you. - Since you won't need the
footests anymore, you can move assertions as you need them directly intobaritself and modify as necessary. These would typeof or greater than assertions, or has a property, etc.
The point is, don't get hung up on private anything as something to be mocked. We don't need mocks so much as we good test+dev workflow and ergonomics. That prevents us from overthinking or seeking heroic solutions, and keeps away the anxiety and burnout ~ TDD is meant to do all that.
Couple inline comments, too:
Didn't say throw away your tests for a feature when you hide it. You can re-use them in the code that calls the hidden feature.
Also - when private functions do a lot, making changes later gets harder. If the point of testing is to make life easier, why give that back by hiding stuff? And if exposing it temporarily in order to change and test sounds like more work, the only reason it's more work is that it's being hidden away in the first place. "Exactly what battle are you fighting to keep your code more complex?" (Trostler, Testable Javascript, p 25)