This document ranks every problem in Java Coding Problems, Second Edition (Angel Leonard, Packt) for suitability as a vscbench eval scenario.
This book is available in Microsoft's O'Reilly subscription: link.
Legend
| Column | Meaning |
|---|
This document ranks every problem in Java Coding Problems, Second Edition (Angel Leonard, Packt) for suitability as a vscbench eval scenario.
This book is available in Microsoft's O'Reilly subscription: link.
Legend
| Column | Meaning |
|---|
| 005.zip 005 | |
| 10yard.zip 10-Yard Fight (World, set 1) | |
| 10yard85.zip 10-Yard Fight '85 (US, Taito license) | |
| 10yardj.zip 10-Yard Fight (Japan) | |
| 11beat.zip Eleven Beat | |
| 18wheelr.zip 18 Wheeler (JPN) | |
| 1941.zip 1941: Counter Attack (World) | |
| 1941j.zip 1941: Counter Attack (Japan) | |
| 1942.zip 1942 (Revision B) | |
| 1942a.zip 1942 (Revision A) |
This repository is the source code for the website https://docs.github.com/. I am looking for evidence of docs content in this repository that shows text interspersed with code samples. Is there any such content?
Find docs with interspersed text and code
sequenceDiagram
participant Cron as ⏰ Cron Schedule<br/>(Monday 10:00 UTC)
participant WUS as Weekly Upstream Sync<br/>Workflow
participant Upstream as github/copilot-sdk<br/>(upstream repo)
participant LastMerge as .lastmerge file
participant GHIssues as GitHub Issues
participant Copilot as Copilot Coding Agent<br/>(copilot-swe-agent)
participant Prompt as agentic-merge-upstream<br/>prompt
participant Scripts as Utility Scripts<br/>(.github/scripts/)
https://chatgpt.com/share/69e0dd70-38e8-8332-8592-3018c6030800
Make me smart regarding what history's moral philosophers have written about the culpability of citizens in a democracy for the actions of their governments.
For example, to what extent are the citizens of USA morally culpable for the actions of their government in the 2026-02 war of agression against Iran?
Anti-access and area denial is an operational effect, more precisely, a family of related effects that require different capabilities, operate at different ranges, and impose different burdens on an adversary.
Anti-access operates at the strategic-operational level. It aims to prevent or delay an adversary from entering the theater, raising the cost of transit through chokepoints and corridors until intervention becomes delayed, degraded, or politically unsustainable. In its most expansive form, anti-access also targets the infrastructure from which an adversary would mount operations: the bases, logistics nodes, command facilities, and early warning systems that enable power projection.
Area denial operates at the operational-tactical level. It aims to restrict freedom of maneuver within the theater
| # Iran’s Anti-Access and Area Denial Strategy Is Cruder Than China’s But Still Dangerous | |
| https://warontherocks.com/2026/04/irans-anti-access-and-area-denial-strategy-is-cruder-than-chinas-but-still-dangerous/ | |
| Anti-access and area denial is an operational effect, more precisely, a family of related effects that require different capabilities, operate at different ranges, and impose different burdens on an adversary. | |
| Anti-access operates at the strategic-operational level. It aims to prevent or delay an adversary from entering the theater, raising the cost of transit through chokepoints and corridors until intervention becomes delayed, degraded, or politically unsustainable. In its most expansive form, anti-access also targets the infrastructure from which an adversary would mount operations: the bases, logistics nodes, command facilities, and early warning systems that enable power projection. | |
| Area denial operates at the operational-tactical level. It aims to restrict freedom of maneuver within the theater |
https://x.com/zhuokaiz/status/2032201769053212682
@zhuokaiz AMI Labs just raised $1.03B. World Labs raised $1B a few weeks earlier. Both are betting on world models.
But almost nobody means the same thing by that term.
Here are, in my view, five categories of world models.
Assume a belief system that USA exists only to serve the interests of billionaires.
From that perspective what is the purpose and value of non-billionaires?
Under the assumed belief system—that the USA exists solely to serve the interests of billionaires—the purpose and value of non-billionaires is instrumental, not intrinsic. Their worth is defined by how they support capital accumulation, stability, and legitimacy for billionaire interests.
Below is a clean articulation of that worldview.