Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@edoves
Last active November 7, 2024 02:09
Show Gist options
  • Save edoves/80c01e7ca96f65f063529d4129b463fa to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save edoves/80c01e7ca96f65f063529d4129b463fa to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Neon and Supabase are both platforms that utilize PostgreSQL databases but cater to different development needs. Here's a comparison to help you understand their distinctions:

Neon: Serverless PostgreSQL

  • Architecture: Neon separates compute and storage, offering a serverless PostgreSQL experience with features like autoscaling and the ability to scale to zero during inactivity.

  • Features:

    • Branching: Supports instant database branching, facilitating efficient development workflows.
    • Auto-Scaling: Automatically adjusts resources based on demand, enhancing cost efficiency.
    • Compatibility: Maintains high compatibility with standard PostgreSQL, ensuring seamless integration with existing tools and applications.
  • Use Case: Ideal for developers seeking a scalable, serverless PostgreSQL database without additional backend services.

Supabase: Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS)

  • Architecture: Supabase provides a comprehensive BaaS platform built on PostgreSQL, integrating various backend functionalities.

  • Features:

    • Authentication: Offers built-in user authentication and authorization mechanisms.
    • Realtime Subscriptions: Enables real-time data synchronization and updates.
    • Storage: Provides file storage solutions alongside the database.
    • Auto-Generated APIs: Generates RESTful APIs based on your database schema, simplifying API development.
  • Use Case: Suitable for developers looking for an all-in-one backend solution that includes database management, authentication, real-time capabilities, and storage.

Key Differences:

  • Scope: Neon focuses on delivering a serverless PostgreSQL database with advanced features like branching and auto-scaling. In contrast, Supabase offers a full-fledged backend platform encompassing database services, authentication, real-time updates, and storage.

  • Target Audience: Neon is tailored for developers who need a scalable PostgreSQL database without additional backend services. Supabase caters to those seeking a comprehensive backend solution with integrated services beyond just the database.

In summary, if you require a robust, serverless PostgreSQL database with features like branching and auto-scaling, Neon is a suitable choice. However, if you're looking for a complete backend platform with integrated authentication, real-time capabilities, and storage, Supabase would be more appropriate.

Difference between neon and supabase

Both Neon and Supabase provide managed PostgreSQL databases, but they have distinct features, strengths, and target use cases. Here’s a breakdown of how they differ:

1. Core Focus

  • Neon: Specializes solely in serverless PostgreSQL with built-in scaling, branching, and a developer-friendly interface. It’s ideal for users who want a reliable, scalable PostgreSQL database without extra services.
  • Supabase: Offers a complete backend-as-a-service that includes PostgreSQL along with authentication, file storage, real-time capabilities, and APIs, making it suitable for building end-to-end applications.

2. Real-Time Features

  • Neon: Focuses on core PostgreSQL functionality and does not include built-in real-time or subscription-based updates.
  • Supabase: Adds real-time capabilities on top of PostgreSQL, allowing users to subscribe to database changes, which is useful for real-time applications such as chats, notifications, and live data updates.

3. APIs and SDKs

  • Neon: Provides a PostgreSQL database without additional APIs or SDKs, so developers need to interact with it using PostgreSQL clients or set up their own API layer.
  • Supabase: Automatically generates RESTful APIs for your database and includes client libraries (SDKs) for various languages and frameworks, which simplifies integration with front-end applications.

4. Authentication and Authorization

  • Neon: Does not include authentication or user management features. Developers would need to implement these separately.
  • Supabase: Comes with built-in authentication (email/password, social providers, and third-party OAuth) and granular authorization policies (using PostgreSQL’s Row Level Security).

5. Branching and Deployment

  • Neon: Known for its branching capabilities, Neon allows developers to create isolated database branches similar to Git. This is useful for testing, staging, and experimenting without affecting production.
  • Supabase: Lacks the branching feature that Neon offers, but it has a built-in version control system for tables, enabling schema tracking and migration.

6. File Storage and Serverless Functions

  • Neon: Focuses strictly on PostgreSQL, so there is no file storage or serverless function support.
  • Supabase: Includes file storage and allows users to run serverless functions (using its Edge Functions) to handle custom backend logic, making it a more comprehensive solution for full-stack applications.

7. Pricing and Free Tier

  • Neon: Has a free tier offering up to 3 GB of storage with 1 vCPU, making it budget-friendly for small projects or experimentation.
  • Supabase: Free tier includes 2 projects with PostgreSQL databases, authentication, storage, and API access, but may be slightly more limiting in terms of usage limits compared to Neon’s PostgreSQL-only free tier.

8. Best For

  • Neon: Ideal for developers who need a dedicated PostgreSQL database with features like branching and scaling, especially if they plan to handle other backend tasks separately.
  • Supabase: Suitable for building full-stack applications quickly without needing to manage multiple backend services, as it includes everything from the database to storage, real-time, and authentication.

In summary:

  • Neon is a focused solution for scalable PostgreSQL with branching.
  • Supabase is an all-in-one backend platform that offers more than just the database, making it well-suited for full-stack applications.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment