Last active
March 7, 2020 00:43
-
-
Save eignnx/113fabd8ede9e732e9110e2b586f5832 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
why
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| fn slice_of_slice<'pool, 'slice, 'ret>( | |
| pool: &'pool [usize], | |
| slice: &'slice [usize], | |
| ) -> &'ret [usize] | |
| where | |
| 'pool: 'slice, // `pool` outlives `slice` | |
| 'slice: 'ret, // `slice` outlives the return value | |
| { | |
| // Most of this is bullshit so that both `slice` and `pool` are used. | |
| let pool_idx = slice[0]; | |
| let slice_idx = pool[pool_idx]; | |
| &slice[slice_idx..slice_idx + 1] | |
| } | |
| #[test] | |
| fn test_slice_of_slice() { | |
| let pool = vec![1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 99, 3, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2]; | |
| let ret = { | |
| let slice = &pool[3..6]; // == &[1, 99, 2] | |
| slice_of_slice(&pool, slice) | |
| }; // `slice` is dropped here. | |
| // `ret` is still alive. | |
| assert_eq!(ret, &[99]); // I thought `slice` had to outlive `ret`! | |
| } |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment