Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@ento
Last active August 29, 2015 13:56
Show Gist options
  • Save ento/9030116 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save ento/9030116 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Evaluation rubric from Introduction to Mathematical Thinking (maththink-004)

An argument that does not address the stated result (or answer the given question) should be given 0 marks in all categories.


  • Logical correctness: 0/2/4
  • Clarity: 0/2/4
  • Opening: 0/2/4
  • Stating the conclusion: 0/2/4
  • Reasons: 0/2/4
  • Overall evaluation: 0/2/4

Logical correctness

Novice (0 points)
The answer given is fundamentally wrong.

Apprentice (2 points)
The approach is generally correct, but there is at least one significant error.

Practitioner (4 points)
Other than perhaps a minor slip, the proof is complete and correct.

Clarity

Novice (0 points)
Overall, the argument is hard or impossible to follow.

Apprentice (2 points)
Can follow it with some effort. Some parts may be clearer than others.

Practitioner (4 points)
Clear and easy to follow throughout.

Opening

Novice (0 points)
No opening statement of what is being proved. No mention of use of standard method, where relevant (e.g. induction).

Apprentice (2 points)
There is a statement of what is being proved (inc. mention of a standard method, if relevant), but it comes later and/or is incomplete.

Practitioner (4 points)
Clear, correct opening statement of what is being proved, with statement of method if a standard method is used.

Stating the conclusion

Novice (0 points)
Argument ends abruptly, without stating or acknowledging a conclusion.

Apprentice (2 points)
Argument ends with some form of concluding statement, but it is not clear and definitive.

Practitioner (4 points)
Argument concludes with a clear and concise statement indicating that the desired result has been established.

Reasons

Novice (0 points)
Significant steps presented without justification.

Apprentice (2 points)
Some significant steps are justified, but at least one is not.

Practitioner (4 points)
Reasons are given for all significant steps.

Overall evaluation

Novice (0 points)
Overall, this is not a good answer.

Apprentice (2 points)
The answer is fairly good, but there is room for improvement.

Practitioner (4 points)
Discounting small, minor slips, this is a good answer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment