Created
October 21, 2014 19:16
-
-
Save eriktrom/115ce1ee2b3e6c3b4709 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
FizzBuzz
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
describe('FizzBuzz', function () { | |
it('prints "Fizz" for multiples of 3, "Buzz" for 5 and "FizzBuzz" for multiples of 3 or 5', function () { | |
var expected = [ | |
1, | |
2, | |
"Fizz", | |
4, | |
"Buzz", | |
"Fizz", | |
7, | |
8, | |
"Fizz", | |
"Buzz", | |
11, | |
"Fizz", | |
13, | |
14, | |
"FizzBuzz", | |
16, | |
17, | |
"Fizz", | |
19, | |
"Buzz", | |
"Fizz", | |
22, | |
23, | |
"Fizz", | |
"Buzz", | |
26, | |
"Fizz", | |
28, | |
29, | |
"FizzBuzz", | |
31, | |
32, | |
"Fizz", | |
34, | |
"Buzz", | |
"Fizz", | |
37, | |
38, | |
"Fizz", | |
"Buzz", | |
41, | |
"Fizz", | |
43, | |
44, | |
"FizzBuzz", | |
46, | |
47, | |
"Fizz", | |
49, | |
"Buzz", | |
"Fizz", | |
52, | |
53, | |
"Fizz", | |
"Buzz", | |
56, | |
"Fizz", | |
58, | |
59, | |
"FizzBuzz", | |
61, | |
62, | |
"Fizz", | |
64, | |
"Buzz", | |
"Fizz", | |
67, | |
68, | |
"Fizz", | |
"Buzz", | |
71, | |
"Fizz", | |
73, | |
74, | |
"FizzBuzz", | |
76, | |
77, | |
"Fizz", | |
79, | |
"Buzz", | |
"Fizz", | |
82, | |
83, | |
"Fizz", | |
"Buzz", | |
86, | |
"Fizz", | |
88, | |
89, | |
"FizzBuzz", | |
91, | |
92, | |
"Fizz", | |
94, | |
"Buzz", | |
"Fizz", | |
97, | |
98, | |
"Fizz", | |
"Buzz" | |
].join("\n"); | |
var actual = _.chain(_.range(1, 101)) | |
.reduce(function (memo, num) { | |
if (num % 3 === 0 && num % 5 === 0) memo.push("FizzBuzz"); | |
else if (num % 3 === 0) memo.push("Fizz"); | |
else if (num % 5 === 0) memo.push("Buzz"); | |
else memo.push(num); | |
return memo; | |
}, []).join("\n") | |
.value(); | |
expect(actual).to.eq(expected); | |
}); | |
}); |
kiwiupover
commented
Oct 21, 2014
@kiwiupover - lol, just saw this
One thing though, given they return the same result, I would argue mine is easier to reason about down the road or when doing code review.
Thoughts? Agree or disagree?
Also, @kiwiupover - let me know your thoughts on my for loop criticism/critique if your curious. https://gist.github.com/trombom/cc5c56be2abf890ac880
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment