Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

Show Gist options
  • Save exonomyapp/076f9b4c8669f5463f8838d5d1bc79f0 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save exonomyapp/076f9b4c8669f5463f8838d5d1bc79f0 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Forever Free P2P Outsourced Search-as-a-Service

Forever Free P2P Outsourced Search-as-a-Service

Introduction to Algolia

Algolia is a search-as-a-service platform that provides a highly performant, flexible, and feature-rich solution for implementing search functionality in applications and websites. It allows developers to create custom search experiences with minimal effort, offering features like:

  1. Real-time Search: Instant, fast results as users type.
  2. Ranking & Relevance: Configurable ranking algorithms to prioritize the most relevant results.
  3. Faceted Search: Filters and facets for narrowing down search results dynamically.
  4. Autocomplete: Predictive text suggestions and search completion.
  5. Multilingual Support: Search functionality for multiple languages.
  6. Analytics: Insights into search queries, usage patterns, and trends.

Key Benefits

  • Speed: Its distributed infrastructure ensures low-latency responses.
  • Scalability: Suitable for small projects to large-scale applications.
  • Ease of Integration: Provides APIs and SDKs for various platforms and languages.

Algolia is widely used in e-commerce, SaaS platforms, and content-heavy websites for delivering tailored, fast, and user-friendly search experiences.

Algolia does not depend on Google's spiders or any web-crawling mechanism. Unlike search engines like Google, which index content from the web using spiders (automated bots), Algolia operates as a hosted search engine tailored for specific applications or websites.

How Algolia Works

  • Content Upload: Developers or applications directly upload their structured data (e.g., product catalogs, articles, user-generated content) to Algolia's servers via its API.
  • Indexing: Algolia indexes this data internally and optimizes it for search queries.
  • Search Queries: Users of the application interact with Algolia's API to perform searches, receiving fast and highly relevant results.

Key Differences from Google Spiders

  1. Controlled Data Source: Algolia only processes the data explicitly provided to it; it does not crawl the web.
  2. Custom Search Indexes: Developers define and manage the data, ensuring full control over what is searchable.
  3. Tailored Results: Algolia provides tools to adjust ranking, relevance, and filters specific to the application’s needs.

Algolia is entirely independent of Google's infrastructure or spidering processes.

Leveraging Algolia in a P2P Environment

Algolia offers a crawler technology for decentralized P2P content scraping that is then aggregated into fluidly federated content fraternities.

To enable decentralized interaction with Algolia in our P2P voucher publishing app while respecting individual user autonomy and leveraging Algolia's "Build" plan, we can design the integration as follows:


1. User Account Management

Each user will have their own Algolia account created on the "Build" plan. This allows them to:

  • Upload only their data (vouchers).
  • Retain ownership and control over their records.

The app will guide users through:

  • Creating an Algolia account.
  • Retrieving their API credentials (Application ID and API Key).
  • Entering these credentials into the app for integration.

2. Voucher Publishing Workflow

When a user publishes a voucher:

  • The app uses the user's Algolia credentials to upload the voucher's metadata (e.g., DID, description, currency, etc.) to an Algolia index within their account.
  • The voucher's metadata is stored as a record in their personalized Algolia index.

3. Search Implementation Across Accounts

To enable cross-user searches:

  1. Each user opts in to share their search-only API Key with other users (or the app maintains a shared registry of search keys if users agree to participate in a shared discovery mechanism).
  2. When another user performs a search:
    • The app aggregates search keys of other users.
    • A federated search is executed, where the app sends parallel queries to multiple Algolia indexes using these shared API keys.
    • The app compiles and displays results from all the indexes.

4. AI Features & Personalization

  • Users can enable Algolia's AI features to improve search relevance within their personal indexes.
  • Personalization can also be applied individually by each user, ensuring privacy and control.

Technical Steps for Implementation

  1. Voucher Publishing

    import algoliasearch from 'algoliasearch/lite';
    
    function uploadVoucherToAlgolia(userApiKey: string, appId: string, voucher: Voucher) {
        const client = algoliasearch(appId, userApiKey);
        const index = client.initIndex('vouchers');
        return index.saveObject({
            objectID: voucher.id,
            title: voucher.title,
            description: voucher.description,
            currency: voucher.currency,
            author: voucher.authorDid,
            publishedAt: voucher.publishedAt,
        });
    }
  2. Search Across Multiple Accounts

    async function federatedSearch(searchKeys: Array<{ appId: string; apiKey: string }>, query: string) {
        const results = await Promise.all(
            searchKeys.map(({ appId, apiKey }) => {
                const client = algoliasearch(appId, apiKey);
                const index = client.initIndex('vouchers');
                return index.search(query);
            })
        );
        return results.flatMap(result => result.hits);
    }
  3. Onboarding Users

    • Provide UI instructions for:
      • Creating an Algolia account.
      • Retrieving API keys.
    • Use a secure mechanism to store and manage their credentials locally (e.g., encrypted local storage).

Benefits of This Approach

  1. Decentralization: Each user controls their data in their own Algolia account.
  2. Scalability: Algolia's distributed infrastructure supports rapid, scalable search functionality.
  3. Privacy: Users are only responsible for their own data, and API keys can be shared selectively for searches.
  4. Free Tier Sustainability: Each user leverages their own free tier account, minimizing costs.

Thinking outside the Algolia box

Zooming out from Algolia's offering, we consider the risk management aspect of offering Search-as-a-Service as a marketplace rather than a solution provider. When Exonomists sign up for more than one Search-as-a-Service solution, they mitigate the risk of losing their content indexing in the case when Algolia or one or more of Algolia's competitors goes out of business or suffers an outage.

When prioritizing similarity of services over market share, Algolia's top competitors include platforms that offer hosted, developer-centric search solutions with features like relevance tuning, real-time search, and API-based integrations. Here's a list of closely related alternatives that we can offer to our Exonomists and suggest to them that they engage with as many as possible.


1. Meilisearch

  • Description: An open-source, lightweight, and highly customizable search engine.
  • Similarity:
    • API-driven with real-time search capabilities.
    • Focuses on relevance and ranking customization.
    • Offers both self-hosted and managed cloud solutions.
  • Notable Features:
    • Supports typo tolerance and faceted search.
    • Open-source model for full control over hosting.

2. Typesense

  • Description: A fast, open-source search engine optimized for instant search results.
  • Similarity:
    • Provides real-time search with a focus on developer ease.
    • API-first design with simple setup and configuration.
  • Notable Features:
    • Typo tolerance and language-specific tokenization.
    • Relevance customization with minimal complexity.

3. Elastic App Search (by Elastic)

  • Description: A search solution built on Elasticsearch, designed to simplify full-text search for developers.
  • Similarity:
    • Hosted and self-managed options.
    • Advanced relevance tuning and analytics.
  • Notable Features:
    • Extensive language support and query customization.
    • Integration with the larger Elastic Stack for analytics and logging.

4. Search.io (formerly Sajari)

  • Description: A SaaS search platform designed for websites and applications, emphasizing AI-driven relevance.
  • Similarity:
    • API-based integration with a focus on relevance.
    • Includes real-time indexing and filtering.
  • Notable Features:
    • AI-powered ranking and dynamic learning.
    • Designed for e-commerce, media, and SaaS.

5. Swiftype (by Elastic)

  • Description: A hosted search engine aimed at website and document-based search needs.
  • Similarity:
    • Managed search service with relevance tuning.
    • Tailored for websites, intranets, and document search.
  • Notable Features:
    • Intuitive search analytics and ranking control.
    • Easy integration with minimal coding.

6. Clerk.dev

  • Description: A search solution optimized for e-commerce applications.
  • Similarity:
    • Real-time, faceted search tailored for product catalogs.
    • Advanced relevance and ranking features.
  • Notable Features:
    • Personalization through user behavior tracking.
    • Fast, developer-friendly APIs.

7. Pinecone

  • Description: A vector database platform designed for semantic and vector-based search.
  • Similarity:
    • Focused on relevance for AI and machine-learning-driven search experiences.
    • Offers managed services for integration with modern applications.
  • Notable Features:
    • Embedding-based search for rich content like images and text.
    • Scalable infrastructure for large datasets.

Comparison: Algolia vs. Competitors

Feature Algolia Meilisearch Typesense Elastic App Search Search.io Swiftype Pinecone Clerk.dev
Hosting Fully managed SaaS Self-hosted & Cloud Self-hosted & Cloud Self-hosted & Cloud Fully managed SaaS Fully managed SaaS Fully managed SaaS Fully managed SaaS
Open Source No Yes Yes Yes No No No No
Real-Time Search Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Faceted Search Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Limited Yes
AI Features Yes Limited No Limited Yes No Yes Yes
Relevance Tuning Advanced Good Good Advanced Advanced Advanced Limited Limited
Scalability Excellent Moderate Moderate Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent
Ease of Setup Very Easy Easy Easy Moderate Very Easy Very Easy Moderate Easy (for e-commerce)
Cost Free & Paid Plans Free & Paid (Self-host) Free & Paid (Self-host) Free & Paid Paid Only Paid Only Paid Only Paid Only

Algolia isn't Open Source but some of its competitors do offer this benefit.

Detailed Comparison: Algolia, Meilisearch, Typesense, and Elastic App Search

1. Open Source Benefits

Algolia is a closed-source SaaS product, while Meilisearch, Typesense, and Elastic App Search have open-source options, offering the following advantages:

  • Cost Savings: Open-source platforms can be self-hosted, avoiding recurring SaaS costs.
  • Control: Complete control over data, customization, and deployment environments.
  • Transparency: Open-source code ensures no hidden mechanisms or lock-in risks.
  • Flexibility: Adaptable to unique requirements beyond standard configurations.
  • Community Contributions: Open-source projects benefit from community-driven improvements and bug fixes.
Feature Algolia Meilisearch Typesense Elastic App Search
Open Source No Yes Yes Yes
Cost SaaS pricing Free (Self-host) Free (Self-host) Free (Self-host)
Self-Hosting Options No Yes Yes Yes

2. Ease of Use

  • Algolia: Intuitive with robust documentation, SDKs, and plug-and-play SaaS hosting.
  • Meilisearch: Lightweight and easy to deploy but requires manual hosting setup.
  • Typesense: Simple deployment with CLI and Docker options; clear documentation.
  • Elastic App Search: Deeper learning curve if self-hosted (built on Elasticsearch).

| Ease of Setup | Very Easy | Easy | Easy | Moderate |

3. Performance and Speed

  • Algolia: Optimized for speed at scale with distributed infrastructure.
  • Meilisearch & Typesense: Perform well for small to medium datasets but require tuning for large-scale deployments.
  • Elastic App Search: Built on Elasticsearch, providing robust performance for large datasets but potentially slower indexing.

| Performance | Excellent | Good | Good | Excellent |

4. Features and Customization

  • Algolia: Advanced relevance tuning, AI features, and scalability; lacks complete flexibility due to SaaS limitations.
  • Meilisearch: Strong typo tolerance and faceted search but fewer advanced features like AI or multi-region hosting.
  • Typesense: Excellent for lightweight, typo-tolerant, and relevance-tuned search; lacks AI and analytics.
  • Elastic App Search: Highly customizable with robust analytics and relevance control.

| Features | Advanced | Moderate | Moderate | Advanced |

5. Cost Comparison

  • Algolia: SaaS pricing with free tier (limits on search requests and records).
  • Meilisearch & Typesense: Free for self-hosted; costs depend on infrastructure.
  • Elastic App Search: Free tier for self-hosted; Elastic's managed hosting is priced competitively.

Summary of Key Differences

  • Algolia: Best for fast, out-of-the-box SaaS solutions with AI-driven features and excellent scalability.
  • Meilisearch: Ideal for lightweight, open-source search with ease of setup and community support.
  • Typesense: Great for typo-tolerant, open-source real-time search with a focus on simplicity.
  • Elastic App Search: Suited for advanced users requiring full-text search integrated with analytics and Elasticsearch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment