cmd+k z
-> zen modecmd+\
-> side-by-sidecmd+b
-> toggle sidebarcmd+shift+m
-> problems panelctrl+j
-> join line
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
import React from 'react'; | |
import debounce from 'utils/debounce'; | |
class EmailInput extends React.Component { | |
checkEmail = value => { | |
// only check if the field passes Yup email validation first | |
if ( | |
!this.props.form.errors[this.props.name].includes( | |
'invalid' /* or whatever your error message is*/ | |
) |
- 3 ovos
- 1/3 xic açúcar
- 1/2 xic trigo
- 1/2 col chá fermento químico
- 3/4 a 1 xic morangos picados
This is the follow up to a post I wrote recently called From Require.js to Webpack - Party 1 (the why) which was published in my personal blog.
In that post I talked about 3 main reasons for moving from require.js to webpack:
- Common JS support
- NPM support
- a healthy loader/plugin ecosystem.
Here I'll instead talk about some of the technical challenges that we faced during the migration. Despite the clear benefits in developer experience (DX) the setup was fairly difficult and I'd like to cover some of the challanges we faced to make the transition a bit easier.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
/** | |
* testing tasks (using karma to test in the browser). Requires a karma.conf.js for full config | |
* single-run testing | |
* continuous testing | |
*/ | |
/** base deps, but you may need more specifically for your application */ | |
var gulp = require('gulp'); | |
var gutil = require('gulp-util'); | |
var path = require('path'); |