-
-
Save fluffybeing/4baca6b051e8f1a9d46c to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Cliff vs Click
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rahulrrixe> rest if we compare cliff and click, then click is better | |
<rahulrrixe> as use of decorator make it very suitable for CLI which we want to developemnt | |
<rahulrrixe> **develop | |
<rahulrrixe> in our case we need to have config file parser and click handles that very well and .ini is custom to it | |
<rahulrrixe> also it support context | |
<rahulrrixe> i don't know much about it but what i have understood through documentation is that like we have <api><resource><action> | |
<rahulrrixe> resource is child for api and if we want to pass the information of api we can do through context | |
<rahulrrixe> it is useful because we want if a user had made connection then it should be stored in object | |
* rdodev (~rdodev@2001:4802:7801:103:18ba:c153:ff20:563f) has joined #libcloud | |
<rahulrrixe> not every request makes a new connection | |
* rdodev (~rdodev@2001:4802:7801:103:18ba:c153:ff20:563f) has left #libcloud ("Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com") | |
<rahulrrixe> i.e. for aws if we had made a connection then it will be stored in obj or context that will be used by action | |
<rahulrrixe> i don't know whether i am saying context thing correctly :( but I understood in that way |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment