uglier is sometimes faster

not_ugly_test.rb

#!/usr/bin/env ruby

require 'yaml'

y=[]
(1..10000).each{|x|
  #next unless x/2==(1.0*x)/2
  z=x
  divisors=[1]
  _continue=true
  while _continue
    _continue=false
    ((divisors.last+1)..z).each{|w|
      r=z/w
      if (1.0*z)/w==r && w<x
        divisors<<w
        _continue=true
        break
      end
    }
  end
  if divisors.inject(&:+)>x and (3..(divisors.count)).find{|w| divisors.combination(w).find{|w2| w2.inject(&:+)==x } }
    y<<x
  end
}
puts "amount: #{y.count}"

ugly_test.rb

#!/usr/bin/env ruby

require 'yaml'

class Test
  attr_reader :y
  def initialize(up)
    @up = up
    @y = []
  end
  def perform
    for x in 1..@up
      divisors, w = [1], 1
      while (w = get_next(w+1, x))
        divisors << w
      end
      y << x if sum(divisors) > x && check(divisors, x)
    end
    self
  end
  def get_next(from, z)
    w = from
    while w < z
      return w if z/w == (1.0*z)/w
      w += 1
    end
    nil
  end
  def sum(ar)
    s = ar[0]
    i, up = 1, ar.size
    while i < up
      s += ar[i]
      i += 1
    end
    s
  end
  def check(divisors, x)
    (3..(divisors.count)).find{|w|
      divisors.combination(w).find{|w2|
        sum(w2) == x
      }
    }
  end
end
puts "amount: #{Test.new(10000).perform.y.count}"

update for latest rbx:

$ time rvm rbx do ruby -v ugly_test.rb
rubinius 2.0.0dev (1.9.3 b4aa36e4 yyyy-mm-dd JI) [x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu]
amount: 2481

real    3m37.907s
user    3m33.326s
sys 0m0.516s

big speedup, still slower but already a lot better then before, here is 1.9.3-p125 for comparison

$ time rvm 1.9.3 do ruby -v ugly_test.rb
ruby 1.9.3p125 (2012-02-16 revision 34643) [x86_64-linux]
amount: 2481

real    2m35.360s
user    2m32.542s
sys 0m0.378s

and jruby-head on java7 is over 2 times faster:

$ time rvm jruby-head do ruby -v ugly_test.rb
jruby 1.7.0.dev (ruby-1.9.3-p139) (2012-04-02 f031f63) (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 1.7.0_03) [linux-amd64-java]
amount: 2481

real    1m29.288s
user    1m25.240s
sys 0m1.670s

It is big step forward for rbx!!!
I'm more interested in IO behavior though. Maybe it improved too.

My numbers seem to put JRuby farther ahead of Ruby 1.9.3 than your numbers:

Ruby 1.9.3:
111.640000 0.080000 111.720000 (111.722357)

JRuby master on Java 7u4:
41.103000 0.000000 41.103000 ( 41.104000)

JRuby's run time is 36% of Ruby 1.9.3's, compared to around 58% in your case. Nearly 3x faster rather than less than 2x. Perhaps JRuby has improved since this run? Perhaps my dual cores are helping (the JVM does use multiple cores for GC)?

A small change improves JRuby further... replace the #[] calls in sum with #at calls:

real 0m33.895s
user 0m37.502s
sys 0m0.421s

In JRuby, #[] is flagged as a method that requires a heap-based scope because some versions of it set $~ (backref). Using .at avoids that.

We plan to fix that deoptimization, but it does make a difference right now.

that could be also java version (mine is a bit older):

$ java -version
java version "1.7.0_03"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_03-b04)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 22.1-b02, mixed mode)

In JRuby, #[] is flagged as a method that requires a heap-based scope because some versions of it set $~ (backref). Using .at avoids that.

Wow :)

@mpapis that certainly could be true. There's also been some optimization work on JRuby master that may not be in your copy.