Next.js SPA example with dynamic client-only routing and static hosting

00-README-NEXT-SPA.md

Next.js client-only SPA example

Made this example to show how to use Next.js router for a 100% SPA (no JS server) app.

You use Next.js router like normally, but don't define getStaticProps and such. Instead you do client-only fetching with swr, react-query, or similar methods.

You can generate HTML fallback for the page if there's something meaningful to show before you "know" the params. (Remember, HTML is static, so it can't respond to dynamic query. But it can be different per route.)

Don't like Next? Here's how to do the same in Gatsby.

Building

npm run build

This produces a purely static app in out/ folder.

It's purely static in the sense that it doesn't require Node.js — but router transitions are all client-side. It's an SPA.

Deploying

Host the out/ folder anywhere on a static hosting.

There is however an unintuitive caveat — which is maybe why people don't use Next.js widely this way at the moment.

In traditional SPA setups like CRA and Vite, you have one file like index.html that's served for every route. The downside of this is that (1) it's empty, (2) it contains your entire bundle by default (code splitting and React.lazy doesn't help here a lot because it creates waterfalls — you still have to load the main bundle first before it "decides" to load other scripts).

But if you look at what Next.js generated, it's an HTML file per route:

• out/index.html
• out/404.html
• out/stuff/[id].html

So you'd need to teach your static server to do this rewrite:

• rewrite / to out/index.html
• rewrite /stuff/whatever to out/stuff/[id].html

The syntax for these rewrites is different for different static hosts, and I don't think there's an automated solution yet.

I suspect this is why a lot of people don't realize Next.js can produce SPAs. It's just not obvious how to set this up.

Ideally I think Next.js should either pregenerate such rewrite lists for common static hosts (e.g. Nginx, Apache) etc or there should be some common format that can be adopted across providers (e.g. Vercel, Netlify, etc).

(Note that if we didn't do next export, Next.js would still create static output, but it would also generate a Node.js server that serves that static output. This is why by default SSG mode in Next.js emits a Node.js app. But it doesn't mean your app needs Node.js by default. Next.js apps don't need Node.js at all by default, until you start using server-only features. But you do need to rewrite your requests to serve the right HTML file for each route.)

This is a better SPA

It makes sense to have an HTML file per route even if you're doing an SPA. Yes, we need to figure out a good way to set up these rewrite maps, but it's strictly better than serving one index.html page with a giant bundle (or a smaller bundle + a bunch of code that's loaded in a waterfall), which is how SPAs are typically done today.

It's also great to have the ability to do a bunch of stuff at the build time. E.g. I can still do getStaticProps + getStaticPaths in this app to pregenerate a bunch of HTML files with actual content. It's still an SPA and still can be hosted statically! I can also eventually decide to add a server, and I don't need to rewrite anything.

01-[id].js

// pages/stuff/[id].js

import { useRouter } from 'next/router';
import Link from 'next/link';
import useSWR from 'swr'

export default function Page() {
  const router = useRouter();
  const id = router.query.id  
  if (id == null) {
    // Static pre-generated HTML
    return <h1>Loading...</h1>
  }
  return (
    <>
      <h1>Page for {id}</h1>
      <ul>
        <li>
          <Link href="/stuff/1">go to 1</Link>
        </li>
        <li>
          <Link href="/stuff/2">go to 2</Link>
        </li>
      </ul>
      <hr />
      <Content id={id} />
    </>
  )
}

const fetcher = (...args) => fetch(...args).then((res) => res.json())

function Content({ id }) {
  const { data, error } = useSWR('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/todos/' + id, fetcher)
  if (error) return <h1>Failed to load</h1>
  if (!data) return <h1>Loading...</h1>
  return (
      <pre>{JSON.stringify(data, null, 2)}</pre>
  );
}

02-index.js

// pages/index.js

import Link from 'next/link';

export default function Page() {
  return (
    <>
      <h1>Index page</h1>
      <hr />
      <ul>
        <li>
          <Link href="/stuff/1">go to 1</Link>
        </li>
        <li>
          <Link href="/stuff/2">go to 2</Link>
        </li>
      </ul>
    </>
  );
}

03-next.config.js

const nextConfig = {
  output: 'export',
}

module.exports = nextConfig

04-package.json

{
  "name": "foobar",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "private": true,
  "scripts": {
    "dev": "next dev",
    "build": "next build && next export",
    "start": "next start",
    "lint": "next lint"
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "next": "13.2.4",
    "react": "18.2.0",
    "react-dom": "18.2.0",
    "swr": "^2.1.0"
  },
  "devDependencies": {
    "eslint": "8.36.0",
    "eslint-config-next": "13.2.4"
  }
}

Thank you for all this.

Does anything like the "proxy" configuration from CRA exist for Next.js client only apps?
https://create-react-app.dev/docs/proxying-api-requests-in-development/

I tried using Next.js "rewrites" but they're not compatible with "output: export".
https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/static-html-export#unsupported-features

Does anything like the "proxy" configuration from CRA exist for Next.js client only apps? https://create-react-app.dev/docs/proxying-api-requests-in-development/

I tried using Next.js "rewrites" but they're not compatible with "output: export". https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/static-html-export#unsupported-features

I guess it depends on the scenario and what you need,
but I have been using fetch()

Does anything like the "proxy" configuration from CRA exist for Next.js client only apps? https://create-react-app.dev/docs/proxying-api-requests-in-development/
I tried using Next.js "rewrites" but they're not compatible with "output: export". https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/static-html-export#unsupported-features

I guess it depends on the scenario and what you need, but I have been using fetch()

During development, I want to proxy requests like fetch('/api/todos') to another port than the one my next.js bundle is being served from, with minimal configuration.

My understanding is that CRA will output an SPA in the traditional meaning: an index.html + main.js + main.css combo. This means you need a JavaScript router, as all routes will actually go through the index.html page.

This experiment doesn't need a JavaScript router. The name "SPA" is also used here however to me it's a "static" or "exported" MPA (Multi-Page Application). It creates multiple pages for your application, "index.html", "about.html"... and the hard part is handling dynamic routes that accepts parameters, like "foobar.com/post/1". If you have a fixed number of posts, you can generate "posts/1.html", "posts/2.html", but if you have an infinite number, you should instead generate a generic "post/[postId].html" page and use URL rewrites to point to the right page.

I find this approach pretty-lightweight, what has made it uncommon until now is that 1) without RSC you needed hydration everywhere, making a static website like this potentially less performant than non-React alternatives 2) the URL rewrite thing is annoying to code, and few frontend devs have the required devops skill (and time) to produce an OSS lib to cover this use case.

I was wondering if we use state management tool like redux, react-query etc (pretty natural for SPA). Will it still work for this MPA? Or in other words, will states stay after moving to a new route?

@jiangwalle I think your question apply more specifically to global state, so for instance using React context in a layout falls into this category too. I think you can't have a global client-side state in an exported app because you don't have SPA-like navigation. So yeah any navigation will lose global state in an exported app.
Usually, it's not a big issue, because it's true in "normal" Next.js app or any other kind of SPA: if the user reload the page or access a page via the browser URL, you also lose the global state.

@tleo19 Hello, it doesn't work https://github.com/leerob/next-static-export-example
Error occurred prerendering page "/spa-post/[id]". Read more: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/prerender-error

Build error occurred
Error: Export encountered errors on following paths:
/spa-post/[id]/page: /spa-post/[id]
can you help me with it?

For those wondering about truly dynamic pages in the App Router + SPA export, this is not yet implemented and tracked here: vercel/next.js#54393
(original issue and closing comment: vercel/next.js#48022 (comment))

@thekirilltaran it's not your fault, this example is documented as not working: https://github.com/leerob/next-static-export-example/blob/4c8dac076b26289bf9ab48fe9cd4ef35bd7abea9/app/spa-post/%5Bid%5D/page.tsx

App Router doesn't support "SPA" dynamic routes at the time of writing