Redux without the sanity checks in a single file. Don't use this, use normal Redux. :-)

slim-redux.js

function mapValues(obj, fn) {
  return Object.keys(obj).reduce((result, key) => {
    result[key] = fn(obj[key], key);
    return result;
  }, {});
}

function pick(obj, fn) {
  return Object.keys(obj).reduce((result, key) => {
    if (fn(obj[key])) {
      result[key] = obj[key];
    }
    return result;
  }, {});
}

function bindActionCreator(actionCreator, dispatch) {
  return (...args) => dispatch(actionCreator(...args));
}

export function bindActionCreators(actionCreators, dispatch) {
  return typeof actionCreators === 'function' ?
    bindActionCreator(actionCreators, dispatch) :
    mapValues(actionCreators, actionCreator =>
      bindActionCreator(actionCreator, dispatch)
    );
}

export function compose(...funcs) {
  return arg => funcs.reduceRight((composed, f) => f(composed), arg);
}

export function applyMiddleware(...middlewares) {
  return (next) => (reducer, initialState) => {
    var store = next(reducer, initialState);
    var dispatch = store.dispatch;
    var chain = [];

    chain = middlewares.map(middleware => middleware({
      getState: store.getState,
      dispatch: (action) => dispatch(action)
    }));
    dispatch = compose(...chain)(store.dispatch);

    return { ...store, dispatch };
  };
}

export function combineReducers(reducers) {
  var finalReducers = pick(reducers, (val) => typeof val === 'function');
  return (state = {}, action) => mapValues(finalReducers,
    (reducer, key) => reducer(state[key], action)
  );
}

export function createStore(reducer, initialState) {
  var currentReducer = reducer;
  var currentState = initialState;
  var listeners = [];
  var isDispatching = false;

  function getState() {
    return currentState;
  }

  function subscribe(listener) {
    listeners.push(listener);

    return function unsubscribe() {
      var index = listeners.indexOf(listener);
      listeners.splice(index, 1);
    };
  }

  function dispatch(action) {
    if (isDispatching) {
      throw new Error('Reducers may not dispatch actions.');
    }

    try {
      isDispatching = true;
      currentState = currentReducer(currentState, action);
    } finally {
      isDispatching = false;
    }

    listeners.slice().forEach(listener => listener());
    return action;
  }

  function replaceReducer(nextReducer) {
    currentReducer = nextReducer;
    dispatch({ type: '@@redux/INIT' });
  }

  dispatch({ type: '@@redux/INIT' });

  return { dispatch, subscribe, getState, replaceReducer };
}

Cool

Haters don't hate you know it's genius... #imnotworthy#

@sabha you probably found it already, but for those who com after, here is connect explained: https://gist.github.com/gaearon/1d19088790e70ac32ea636c025ba424e

Amazingly beautiful code 👍

I'm heavily breathing right now. This is just pure awesomeness!

It's 2018. Is it too late for me to say 'cool'?

Wow!

4 years later...
I'm curious why you use .slice on this line
listeners.slice().forEach(listener => listener());

Why do we need a new array here?

@sag1v while that forEach is a blocking operation it doesn't guarantee that a listener() call wouldn't remove a original listener from the listeners array so by copying the list you won't get weird results. 2nd caveat from here: https://redux.js.org/api/store#subscribe.

@sag1v found the possible reason, please read the 2nd caveat here https://redux.js.org/api/store#subscribe

@raynerpupo For some reason i missed your comments, thanks :)

For other readers, this code snippet can demonstrate what happens if you don't use .slice to create a "snapshot" of the array.
Basically if a listener removes itself from the array, other listeners might not run (due to mutation).

let arr = [func1, func2];
function func1(){
  arr.splice(0, 1) // func1 removes itself from the array
  console.log(1)
}
function func2(){
  console.log(2)
}
arr
//.slice() // if we don't slice here, func2 wont run
.forEach(fn => fn())

// logs: 1

2020, starting to learn redux, and got one confusion for this code snippet:

In the createStore function, there should be a third option argument enhancer right? I checked the redux source code and the createStore function might look this:

function createStore(reducer, preloadedState, enhancer) {
  if (typeof preloadedState === 'function' && typeof enhancer === 'undefined') {
    enhancer = preloadedState
    preloadedState = undefined
  }

  if (typeof enhancer !== 'undefined') {
    if (typeof enhancer !== 'function') {
      throw new Error('Expected the enhancer to be a function.')
    }

    return enhancer(createStore)(reducer, preloadedState)
  }

  // ... dispatch, subscribe, getState, replaceReducer, 
}

In this case we can then pass the applyMiddleware to the createStore function:

const store = createStore(
  rootReducer,
  applyMiddleware(
    thunk,
    logger,
  )

Not sure if my thoughts are reasonable, could someone correct me please?

I did the same for my Redux Course to explain how really Redux works and what is the concept. I notice that in a lot of courses about Redux, teachers miss the importance of selectors...

Could u please share some link to your course? is it available somewhere?

Poetry