Java Utils Pattern is not Human friendly or IDE friendly

UtilsPattern.java

// Java 
// please focus on the function name & declaration 

// As we all know, String is a final class and we can't extend
class StringUtils{
  public static TypeA toTypeA(String str)
}

// Assume TypeA is from third party library that you can't extend
class TypeAUtils {
  public static Double calculateResult(TypeA a) 
}

// Similar to String, you can't extend Double
class DoubleUtils {
  public static Double toTwoDecimalPlace(Double d) 
}

String someString = "someString";

// The execution order is not as same as to our reading direction(top-to-bottom)
// it is difficult to read
final Double typeAResultWithRounding = 
  DoubleUtils.toTwoDecimalPlace(
    TypeAUtils.calculateResult(
      StringUtils.toTypeA(someString)
    )
  );

// flatten it?  better to read but more unnessecary variables are created
final TypeA typeA = StringUtils.toTypeA(someString);
final Double typeAResult = TypeAUtils.calculateResult(typeA);
final Double typeAResultWithRounding = DoubleUtils.toTwoDecimalPlace(typeArResult);
  
// Question: 
// How do a new comer would know to use exactly these three Utils?
// Normally, they would ask someone or implement a duplicate one for their use case.