Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@groovenectar
Last active October 12, 2024 06:36
Show Gist options
  • Save groovenectar/92174cb1c98c1089347e to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save groovenectar/92174cb1c98c1089347e to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
roundedcube.scad - Fork me and make me better!
// More information: https://danielupshaw.com/openscad-rounded-corners/
// Set to 0.01 for higher definition curves (renders slower)
$fs = 0.15;
module roundedcube(size = [1, 1, 1], center = false, radius = 0.5, apply_to = "all") {
// If single value, convert to [x, y, z] vector
size = (size[0] == undef) ? [size, size, size] : size;
translate_min = radius;
translate_xmax = size[0] - radius;
translate_ymax = size[1] - radius;
translate_zmax = size[2] - radius;
diameter = radius * 2;
obj_translate = (center == false) ?
[0, 0, 0] : [
-(size[0] / 2),
-(size[1] / 2),
-(size[2] / 2)
];
translate(v = obj_translate) {
hull() {
for (translate_x = [translate_min, translate_xmax]) {
x_at = (translate_x == translate_min) ? "min" : "max";
for (translate_y = [translate_min, translate_ymax]) {
y_at = (translate_y == translate_min) ? "min" : "max";
for (translate_z = [translate_min, translate_zmax]) {
z_at = (translate_z == translate_min) ? "min" : "max";
translate(v = [translate_x, translate_y, translate_z])
if (
(apply_to == "all") ||
(apply_to == "xmin" && x_at == "min") || (apply_to == "xmax" && x_at == "max") ||
(apply_to == "ymin" && y_at == "min") || (apply_to == "ymax" && y_at == "max") ||
(apply_to == "zmin" && z_at == "min") || (apply_to == "zmax" && z_at == "max")
) {
sphere(r = radius);
} else {
rotate =
(apply_to == "xmin" || apply_to == "xmax" || apply_to == "x") ? [0, 90, 0] : (
(apply_to == "ymin" || apply_to == "ymax" || apply_to == "y") ? [90, 90, 0] :
[0, 0, 0]
);
rotate(a = rotate)
cylinder(h = diameter, r = radius, center = true);
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
@odyzzeus
Copy link

I tried minkowski but it totally messed up the dimensions and position of the object.

This is not caused by an issue in the minkowski method. Instead this behaviour is inherent to it, because the two shapes are added to one another. If you want to correct for these shifts, I can present you a piece of code that "corrects" for shifts using rectangular shapes.

@pleappleappleap
Copy link

Hi Daniel.

I'm running into a bug which rears its ugly head when one tries to set a radius for the cylinder of a single-axis rounding and the radius is larger than one or more of the dimensions of the object. I have an object where the thickness is 0.125 and the radius is 0.325. It makes the thickness of the object larger to compensate, which kinda sucks. It seems like the problem lies with the definitions of the translate variables at the top. If I can find the time, I will see about submitting a fix later.

@pleappleappleap
Copy link

Hi Daniel.

I'm running into a bug which rears its ugly head when one tries to set a radius for the cylinder of a single-axis rounding and the radius is larger than one or more of the dimensions of the object. I have an object where the thickness is 0.125 and the radius is 0.325. It makes the thickness of the object larger to compensate, which kinda sucks. It seems like the problem lies with the definitions of the translate variables at the top. If I can find the time, I will see about submitting a fix later.

It looks like @ggs67's fork fixes this. I think it would be a good idea to replace your code with theirs.

@groovenectar
Copy link
Author

I'm running into a bug which rears its ugly head when one tries to set a radius for the cylinder of a single-axis rounding and the radius is larger than one or more of the dimensions of the object. I have an object where the thickness is 0.125 and the radius is 0.325. It makes the thickness of the object larger to compensate, which kinda sucks. It seems like the problem lies with the definitions of the translate variables at the top. If I can find the time, I will see about submitting a fix later.

It looks like @ggs67's fork fixes this. I think it would be a good idea to replace your code with theirs.

Yes, I'm glad you found that. It's been a while since I've been able to design or print but was aware of some forks... would you say that's the most ideal one to redirect people to when that issue crops up? https://gist.github.com/ggs67/ff6ba8caf5a1871d285c5c758dce0575

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment