User
Ok, seems this dramatic change might not be worth the savings, but thanks a lot for the try. Let's go back to the initial code: after all your experiments with re-implementing, size comparisons and the like? Do you have very simple/local/mininmal-change suggestions how we can safe on BAL size here? These can be very local things, small optimizations, small data format adjustments, .... Whatever you can imagine.
Cursor
Good question. Let me look at the actual old-format BAL structure and find concrete, local optimizations with real measured impact.