Created
August 2, 2017 05:56
-
-
Save hughsando/ed7caf1eaab7ab1dca47bda00f90de18 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Type Traits
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
typedef MapApi<K,V> = { | |
public function set(key:K,value:V) : Void; | |
public function get(key:K) : Null<V>; | |
}; | |
@:generic | |
extern abstract Checker<Typedef, Instance:Typedef> (Dynamic) | |
{ | |
static var instance:Instance; | |
inline public function new() { this = null; } | |
} | |
// Works - no Api check | |
typedef MyMap<K:Int,V> = haxe.ds.IntMap<V>; | |
// Can't have both active, although they are mutualy exclusive | |
//typedef MyMap<K:String,V> = haxe.ds.StringMap<V>; | |
//typedef MyMap<K:{},V> = haxe.ds.ObjectMap<V>; | |
// Api check works after the fact | |
typedef Check1 = Checker< MapApi<Int,Int>, MyMap<Int,Int> >; | |
// Fails as desired | |
//typedef Check2 = Checker< MapApi<Int,Int>, MyMap<Int,String> >; | |
// Allow combination: | |
// expose internal types? | |
//typedef MyMap<K:Int,V> = Checker< MapApi<Int,Int>, MyMap<Int,Int> >.Instance; | |
// or some macro exists today ? | |
//typedef MyMap<K:Int,V> = Tool.typeof( Checker< MapApi<Int,Int>, MyMap<Int,Int> >.instance ); | |
class Traits | |
{ | |
public static function main() | |
{ | |
var t = new MyMap<Int,String>(); | |
t.set(1,"a"); | |
trace(t.get(1)); | |
} | |
} | |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
This shows how apis can be checked without inheritance. Allowing multiple typedefs, and selecting the best one allows completely different implementations to be used. With a little syntactic sugar or some macro magic, the type may be defined and checked at compile-time, with zero visibility at run-time.